IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i7p4070-d530902.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Ink/Toner Savings of English and Thai Ecofonts for Sustainable Printing

Author

Listed:
  • Thanongsak Imjai

    (Center of Excellence in Sustainable Disaster Management, School of Engineering and Technology, Walailak University, Nakhonsithammarat 80161, Thailand)

  • Chirawat Wattanapanich

    (Center of Excellence in Sustainable Disaster Management, School of Engineering and Technology, Walailak University, Nakhonsithammarat 80161, Thailand)

  • Uhamard Madardam

    (Center of Excellence in Sustainable Disaster Management, School of Engineering and Technology, Walailak University, Nakhonsithammarat 80161, Thailand)

  • Reyes Garcia

    (School of Engineering, The University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK)

Abstract

The use of Ecofonts in printing can result in economic savings and lower environmental impact. However, most of the research on the use of Ecofonts focuses on Latin alphabets. Moreover, texts printed with Ecofonts can be perceived as being less legible than those printed with the original typefaces. This study (a) assesses toner use reductions in documents printed with English and Thai Ecofonts, and (b) studies the observers’ perception of texts printed either with Ecofonts or with original typefaces. To achieve this, black pixels were removed from 10 English and 13 Thai typefaces widely used in academia and other media. Visibility and legibility tests, as well as mass analyses tests, were then performed on texts printed with some such typefaces. Results from instrumental measurements and digital image analyses show that the use of Ecofonts reduces toner use of an inkjet printer by up to 28%. The study also proposes a new Ecofont typeface for the Thai language. Visual tests showed that the visual experience of text printed using this Thai Ecofont is satisfactory. Awareness of the benefits of using Ecofonts changes the users’ attitudes towards the printing quality of Ecofont. The removal of black pixels can lead to more sustainable printing, and this simple solution can be extended to other non-Latin languages as part of the global Green Information Technology efforts in South-East Asia.

Suggested Citation

  • Thanongsak Imjai & Chirawat Wattanapanich & Uhamard Madardam & Reyes Garcia, 2021. "Analysis of Ink/Toner Savings of English and Thai Ecofonts for Sustainable Printing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:4070-:d:530902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/4070/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/4070/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rogers, John Geoffrey & Cooper, Samuel J. & Norman, Jon B., 2018. "Uses of industrial energy benchmarking with reference to the pulp and paper industries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 23-37.
    2. Chen, Xiaobin & Man, Yi & Zheng, Qifu & Hu, Yusha & Li, Jigeng & Hong, Mengna, 2019. "Industrial verification of energy saving for the single-tier cylinder based paper drying process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 261-272.
    3. Chunguang Bai & Joseph Sarkis, 2013. "Green information technology strategic justification and evaluation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(5), pages 831-847, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elahi, Ehsan & Zhang, Zhixin & Khalid, Zainab & Xu, Haiyun, 2022. "Application of an artificial neural network to optimise energy inputs: An energy- and cost-saving strategy for commercial poultry farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    2. Bai, Chunguang & Dallasega, Patrick & Orzes, Guido & Sarkis, Joseph, 2020. "Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Valdes, Javier & Masip Macia, Yunesky & Dorner, Wolfgang & Ramirez Camargo, Luis, 2021. "Unsupervised grouping of industrial electricity demand profiles: Synthetic profiles for demand-side management applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    4. Manoj Thomas & Daniela Costa & Tiago Oliveira, 2016. "Assessing the role of IT-enabled process virtualization on green IT adoption," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 693-710, August.
    5. Mariusz Reczulski & Włodzimierz Szewczyk & Michał Kuczkowski, 2023. "Possibilities of Reducing the Heat Energy Consumption in a Tissue Paper Machine—Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Yann Mey Yee & Lilian Sy & Kryzia Lomibao & Josephine Dela Cruz German & Hui-Ming Wee, 2023. "Sustainable Economic Production Quantity Model Considering Greenhouse Gas and Wastewater Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-30, February.
    7. Lai, Changzhi & Wang, Yu & Fan, Kai & Cai, Qilin & Ye, Qing & Pang, Haoqiang & Wu, Xi, 2022. "An improved forecasting model of short-term electric load of papermaking enterprises for production line optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    8. Zhaojun Yang & Jun Sun & Yali Zhang & Ying Wang, 2018. "Peas and carrots just because they are green? Operational fit between green supply chain management and green information system," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 627-645, June.
    9. Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta & Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa & Sarkis, Joseph & Filho, Moacir Godinho, 2019. "Unlocking the circular economy through new business models based on large-scale data: An integrative framework and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 546-552.
    10. Melville Saayman & Juan Carlos Martín & Concepción Román, 2016. "There is no fuzziness when it comes to measuring service quality in national parks," Tourism Economics, , vol. 22(6), pages 1207-1224, December.
    11. Zhaojun Yang & Jun Sun & Yali Zhang & Ying Wang, 0. "Peas and carrots just because they are green? Operational fit between green supply chain management and green information system," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-19.
    12. Ping Wang & Kuo-Ming Chao & Chi-Chun Lo, 2015. "Satisfaction-based Web service discovery and selection scheme utilizing vague sets theory," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 827-844, August.
    13. Nejad, Alireza Mahdavi, 2021. "A new drying approach deploying solid-solid phase change material: A numerical study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    14. Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D. & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Griffiths, Steve & Bazilian, Morgan & Kim, Jinsoo & Foley, Aoife M. & Rooney, David, 2022. "Decarbonizing the pulp and paper industry: A critical and systematic review of sociotechnical developments and policy options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    15. Marta Daroń & Monika Górska, 2023. "Relationships between Selected Quality Tools and Energy Efficiency in Production Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-20, June.
    16. Nguyen Hoang Thuan & Pedro Antunes & David Johnstone, 2016. "Factors influencing the decision to crowdsource: A systematic literature review," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 47-68, February.
    17. Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Sarkis, Joseph & Wang, Xuping, 2016. "Assessing green supply chain practices in the Ghanaian mining industry: A framework and evaluation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PB), pages 325-341.
    18. Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Bai, Chunguang & Sarkis, Joseph & Wang, Xuping, 2015. "Green supply chain practices evaluation in the mining industry using a joint rough sets and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 86-100.
    19. Bartosz Wachnik & Aleksandra Krupa & Krzysztof Santarek, 2022. "A Comparative Analysis of the Acquisition Transaction of Management Information Systems through Virtual and Face-to-Face Negotiations—The Perspective of Green IT Industry in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-12, August.
    20. Chunguang Bai & Behnam Fahimnia & Joseph Sarkis, 2017. "Sustainable transport fleet appraisal using a hybrid multi-objective decision making approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 250(2), pages 309-340, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:4070-:d:530902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.