IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i6p3402-d520268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Vulnerability Assessment for Pandemic Surveillance—The COVID-19 Case in Bogotá, Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Jeisson Prieto

    (Departamento de Matemáticas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá 11001, Colombia)

  • Rafael Malagón

    (Departamento de Salud Colectiva, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá 11001, Colombia)

  • Jonatan Gomez

    (Departamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas e Industrial, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá 11001, Colombia)

  • Elizabeth León

    (Departamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas e Industrial, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá 11001, Colombia)

Abstract

A pandemic devastates the lives of global citizens and causes significant economic, social, and political disruption. Evidence suggests that the likelihood of pandemics has increased over the past century because of increased global travel and integration, urbanization, and changes in land use with a profound affectation of society–nature metabolism. Further, evidence concerning the urban character of the pandemic has underlined the role of cities in disease transmission. An early assessment of the severity of infection and transmissibility can help quantify the pandemic potential and prioritize surveillance to control highly vulnerable urban areas in pandemics. In this paper, an Urban Vulnerability Assessment (UVA) methodology is proposed. UVA investigates various vulnerability factors related to pandemics to assess the vulnerability in urban areas. A vulnerability index is constructed by the aggregation of multiple vulnerability factors computed on each urban area (i.e., urban density, poverty index, informal labor, transmission routes). This methodology is useful in a-priori evaluation and development of policies and programs aimed at reducing disaster risk (DRR) at different scales (i.e., addressing urban vulnerability at national, regional, and provincial scales), under diverse scenarios of resources scarcity (i.e., short and long-term actions), and for different audiences (i.e., the general public, policy-makers, international organizations). The applicability of UVA is shown by the identification of high vulnerable areas based on publicly available data where surveillance should be prioritized in the COVID-19 pandemic in Bogotá, Colombia.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeisson Prieto & Rafael Malagón & Jonatan Gomez & Elizabeth León, 2021. "Urban Vulnerability Assessment for Pandemic Surveillance—The COVID-19 Case in Bogotá, Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3402-:d:520268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3402/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3402/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonatan Gomez & Jeisson Prieto & Elizabeth Leon & Arles Rodríguez, 2021. "INFEKTA—An agent-based model for transmission of infectious diseases: The COVID-19 case in Bogotá, Colombia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Mishra, Swasti Vardhan & Gayen, Amiya & Haque, Sk. Mafizul, 2020. "COVID-19 and urban vulnerability in India," SocArXiv 523r8, Center for Open Science.
    3. Peter Emerson, 2013. "The original Borda count and partial voting," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 40(2), pages 353-358, February.
    4. Jorge Salas & Víctor Yepes, 2019. "VisualUVAM: A Decision Support System Addressing the Curse of Dimensionality for the Multi-Scale Assessment of Urban Vulnerability in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuming Lin & Zhenjiang Shen, 2022. "An Innovative Index for Evaluating Urban Vulnerability on Pandemic Using LambdaMART Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Tan, Si Ying & Foo, Chuan De & Verma, Monica & Hanvoravongchai, Piya & Cheh, Paul Li Jen & Pholpark, Aungsumalee & Marthias, Tiara & Hafidz, Firdaus & Prawidya Putri, Likke & Mahendradhata, Yodi & Gia, 2023. "Mitigating the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on vulnerable populations: Lessons for improving health and social equity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    3. Jorge Salas & Víctor Yepes, 2020. "Enhancing Sustainability and Resilience through Multi-Level Infrastructure Planning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-22, February.
    4. González-Parra, Gilberto & Villanueva-Oller, Javier & Navarro-González, F.J. & Ceberio, Josu & Luebben, Giulia, 2024. "A network-based model to assess vaccination strategies for the COVID-19 pandemic by using Bayesian optimization," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    5. Arora, Varun & Chakravarty, Sujoy & Kapoor, Hansika & Mukherjee, Shagata & Roy, Shubhabrata & Tagat, Anirudh, 2023. "No going back: COVID-19 disease threat perception and male migrants' willingness to return to work in India," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 533-546.
    6. Lili Li & Araz Taeihagh & Si Ying Tan, 2023. "A scoping review of the impacts of COVID-19 physical distancing measures on vulnerable population groups," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Shahparvari, Shahrooz & Hassanizadeh, Behnam & Mohammadi, Alireza & Kiani, Behzad & Lau, Kwok Hung & Chhetri, Prem & Abbasi, Babak, 2022. "A decision support system for prioritised COVID-19 two-dosage vaccination allocation and distribution," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    8. Laruelle, Annick, 2021. "Voting to select projects in participatory budgeting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 598-604.
    9. Andrew C. Eggers, 2021. "A diagram for analyzing ordinal voting systems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 56(1), pages 143-171, January.
    10. Das, Arijit & Das, Manob, 2023. "Exploring the relationship between quality of living and green spaces in cities: Evidence from an Indian megacity region of global south," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    11. Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde & João V. Ferreira, 2024. "The expressive power of voting rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 62(2), pages 233-273, March.
    12. Wei-Chao Lin & Ching Chen, 2021. "Novel World University Rankings Combining Academic, Environmental and Resource Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    13. N. Bradley Fox & Benjamin Bruyns, 2024. "An Evaluation of Borda Count Variations Using Ranked Choice Voting Data," Papers 2501.00618, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    14. Eric Kamwa, 2022. "Scoring Rules, Ballot Truncation, and the Truncation Paradox," Working Papers hal-03632662, HAL.
    15. Eric Kamwa, 2022. "Scoring rules, ballot truncation, and the truncation paradox," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 192(1), pages 79-97, July.
    16. Hülya Yürekli & Öyküm Esra Yiğit & Okan Bulut & Min Lu & Ersoy Öz, 2022. "Exploring Factors That Affected Student Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of Data-Mining Approaches," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-16, September.
    17. Monaco, Roberto & Bergaentzlé, Claire & Leiva Vilaplana, Jose Angel & Ackom, Emmanuel & Nielsen, Per Sieverts, 2024. "Digitalization of power distribution grids: Barrier analysis, ranking and policy recommendations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    18. Junya Wang & Yi-Jiao Zhang & Cong Xu & Jiaze Li & Jiachen Sun & Jiarong Xie & Ling Feng & Tianshou Zhou & Yanqing Hu, 2024. "Reconstructing the evolution history of networked complex systems," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Aledo, Juan A. & Gámez, Jose A. & Molina, David, 2016. "Using extension sets to aggregate partial rankings in a flexible setting," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 290(C), pages 208-223.
    20. Bhaskar Tripathi & Rakesh Kumar Sharma, 2025. "Cryptocurrency Exchanges and Traditional Markets: A Multi-algorithm Liquidity Comparison Using Multi-criteria Decision Analysis," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 65(5), pages 2649-2677, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3402-:d:520268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.