IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i6p3392-d520084.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of System Thinking and Factors Interrelationship Analysis to Identify Primary Success Factors of Post-Natural Disaster Recovery Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Homa Bahmani

    (School of Civil Engineering and Hydraulic, Department of Construction Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Wei Zhang

    (School of Civil Engineering and Hydraulic, Department of Construction Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

An increasing number of natural disasters and deficiencies in recovery projects have emerged recently and necessitated the creation of versatile guidelines to achieve successful Post-Natural Disaster Recovery (PNDR) projects. Although some criteria have been set to measure these PNDR projects’ success, this topic needs further investigation. The solution may be extensive studies offering a holistic explanation for PNDR projects’ success. This paper creates a comprehensive continual cycle to illustrate these projects’ objectives. Subsequently, subsets or influential elements of the defined objectives can be recognized. Recently, several attempts have been made to apply System Thinking to construct a framework of the influential factors in a successful PNDR project; however, there is little focus in the previous works on identifying all the influential elements. This study can be separated into two parts; the first involves context analysis, which is applied to numerous resources coded by NVivo 2020 and several codes derived from five subsystems. Subsequently, the identified factors within the PNDR projects’ life cycle are analyzed twice, and the existing interrelationships are found out. The factors’ redundancy is examined, and among the 59 final factors, an objective-based categorization is performed. The time-based objectives, known as Primary Success Factors (PSFs), and their subsets/influential parameters are lastly illustrated and used to structure the identification and measurement of Critical Success Factors (CSFs) for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Homa Bahmani & Wei Zhang, 2021. "Application of System Thinking and Factors Interrelationship Analysis to Identify Primary Success Factors of Post-Natural Disaster Recovery Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3392-:d:520084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3392/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3392/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu Xiao & Robert Olshansky & Yang Zhang & Laurie A. Johnson & Yan Song, 2020. "Financing rapid community reconstruction after catastrophic disaster: lessons from the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 5-30, October.
    2. Fayazi, Mahmood & Yeh, Emily T. & Li, Fan, 2019. "Development and divergent post-disaster trajectories in a mountain village: Temporal dynamics of differentiation after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    3. He, Fei & Zhuang, Jun, 2016. "Balancing pre-disaster preparedness and post-disaster relief," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 246-256.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Homa Bahmani & Wei Zhang, 2022. "Why Do Communities Recover Differently after Socio-Natural Disasters? Pathways to Comprehensive Success of Recovery Projects Based on Bam’s (Iran) Neighborhoods’ Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Summaira Malik & Muhammad Taqi & José Moleiro Martins & Mário Nuno Mata & João Manuel Pereira & António Abreu, 2021. "Exploring the Relationship between Communication and Success of Construction Projects: The Mediating Role of Conflict," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Homa Bahmani & Wei Zhang, 2022. "A conceptual framework for integrated management of disasters recovery projects," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(2), pages 859-885, September.
    2. Feng Li & Qingyuan Zhu & Jun Zhuang, 2018. "Analysis of fire protection efficiency in the United States: a two-stage DEA-based approach," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(1), pages 23-68, January.
    3. Sperling, Martina & Schryen, Guido, 2022. "Decision support for disaster relief: Coordinating spontaneous volunteers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 690-705.
    4. Konrad, Renata A. & Trapp, Andrew C. & Palmbach, Timothy M. & Blom, Jeffrey S., 2017. "Overcoming human trafficking via operations research and analytics: Opportunities for methods, models, and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 733-745.
    5. Anna Nagurney & Mojtaba Salarpour & June Dong & Ladimer S. Nagurney, 2020. "A Stochastic Disaster Relief Game Theory Network Model," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 1-33, June.
    6. Haorui Wu, 2021. "When Housing and Communities Were Delivered: A Case Study of Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Rural Reconstruction and Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Zhiying Wang & Xiaodi Liu & Shitao Zhang, 2019. "A New Decision Method for Public Opinion Crisis with the Intervention of Risk Perception of the Public," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-14, July.
    8. Jamal Al Qundus & Kosai Dabbour & Shivam Gupta & Régis Meissonier & Adrian Paschke, 2022. "Wireless sensor network for AI-based flood disaster detection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 697-719, December.
    9. Maass, Kayse Lee & Trapp, Andrew C. & Konrad, Renata, 2020. "Optimizing placement of residential shelters for human trafficking survivors," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    10. Malin Song & Qianqian Du, 2019. "Analysis and exploration of damage-reduction measures for flood disasters in China," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 795-810, December.
    11. Karakoc, Deniz Berfin & Barker, Kash & González, Andrés D., 2023. "Analyzing the tradeoff between vulnerability and recoverability investments for interdependent infrastructure networks," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    12. V. G. Venkatesh & Abraham Zhang & Eric Deakins & Sunil Luthra & S. Mangla, 2019. "A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach to supply partner selection in continuous aid humanitarian supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1517-1550, December.
    13. Noham, Reut & Tzur, Michal, 2018. "Designing humanitarian supply chains by incorporating actual post-disaster decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 1064-1077.
    14. Fang, Yi-Ping & Zio, Enrico, 2019. "An adaptive robust framework for the optimization of the resilience of interdependent infrastructures under natural hazards," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 1119-1136.
    15. Acar, Müge & Kaya, Onur, 2023. "Dynamic inventory decisions for humanitarian aid materials considering budget limitations," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    16. Hasti Seraji & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam & Sobhan Asian & Harpreet Kaur, 2022. "An integrative location-allocation model for humanitarian logistics with distributive injustice and dissatisfaction under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 211-257, December.
    17. Robert Olshansky & Yu Xiao & Daniel Abramson, 2020. "Guest Editorial to the Special Issue: Lessons Learned from post-2008 Wenchuan Earthquake Community Recovery," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 1-3, October.
    18. Yumashev, Dmitry & Johnson, Paul, 2017. "Flexible decision making in the wake of large scale nuclear emergencies: Long-term response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 368-389.
    19. Konstantinos Nikolopoulos & Fotios Petropoulos & Vasco Sanchez Rodrigues & Stephen Pettit & Anthony Beresford, 2019. "A risk-mitigation model driven from the level of forecastability of Black Swans: prepare and respond to major Earthquakes through a dynamic Temporal and Spatial Aggregation forecasting framework," Working Papers 19017, Bangor Business School, Prifysgol Bangor University (Cymru / Wales).
    20. Mishra, Dillip Kumar & Ghadi, Mojtaba Jabbari & Azizivahed, Ali & Li, Li & Zhang, Jiangfeng, 2021. "A review on resilience studies in active distribution systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3392-:d:520084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.