IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p2161-d501026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of a TeamWork-HBIM for the Management and Sustainability of Architectural Heritage

Author

Listed:
  • Juan E. Nieto-Julián

    (Department of Graphical Expression and Building Engineering, University of Seville, 41012 Seville, Spain)

  • Lenin Lara

    (School for the City, Landscape and Architecture, CipArq, International University of Ecuador, Simón Bolívar Av. and Jorge Fernández Av., 170411 Quito, Ecuador
    DTCA—Department of Construction and Architectural Technology, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Juan de Herrera Av., 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Juan Moyano

    (Department of Graphical Expression and Building Engineering, University of Seville, 41012 Seville, Spain)

Abstract

The benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM) accrue from the needs of the interoperability of applied technologies. This scope is strongly related to heritage buildings. Protection plans encompassing phases of heritage conservation, interpretation, intervention and dissemination could lead to a sustainable model through a TeamWork-HBIM project. This work develops a step by step semantically enriched 3D model, from accurate data acquisition to the creation of a container of artistic assets. TeamWork-HBIM acts as a database for movable assets, i.e., parametric objects (GDL) with graphical and semantic information, which are valid for recording, inventory and cataloguing processes. Thus, heritage properties were created and used to create recording and inventory sheets related to movable assets. Consequently, a parametric object was edited in the HBIM project, so a new category called “Heritage Furniture” was available. Data from the monitoring of the artistic asset were included in that category. In addition, the specialist technicians from the TeamWork-HBIM team catalogued a dataset related to artistic, historical and conservation properties. Another advantage of the system was the reliability of the structure of the HBIM project, which was based on the actual geometry of the building provided by the point clouds. The information was valid for both modelling works and specialists in virtual monitoring. Moreover, the reliability of metadata was collected in a common data environment (CDE), which was available for everyone. As a result, the Teamwork-HBIM-CDE project meets the needs of private institutions, such as the Foundation of the Church of the Company of Jesus in Quito, related to the sustainability of the historic site. This sustainability is shown by the implementation of a methodology that strengthens the interdisciplinary information flow by including all disciplines of historical heritage.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan E. Nieto-Julián & Lenin Lara & Juan Moyano, 2021. "Implementation of a TeamWork-HBIM for the Management and Sustainability of Architectural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2161-:d:501026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2161/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2161/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fodil Fadli & Mahmoud AlSaeed, 2019. "Digitizing Vanishing Architectural Heritage; The Design and Development of Qatar Historic Buildings Information Modeling [Q-HBIM] Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Isabel Jordan-Palomar & Patricia Tzortzopoulos & Jorge García-Valldecabres & Eugenio Pellicer, 2018. "Protocol to Manage Heritage-Building Interventions Using Heritage Building Information Modelling (HBIM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carmen Marín-Buzón & Antonio Pérez-Romero & José Luis López-Castro & Imed Ben Jerbania & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro, 2021. "Photogrammetry as a New Scientific Tool in Archaeology: Worldwide Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-27, May.
    2. Fabrizio Banfi & Stefano Roascio & Francesca Romana Paolillo & Mattia Previtali & Fabio Roncoroni & Chiara Stanga, 2022. "Diachronic and Synchronic Analysis for Knowledge Creation: Architectural Representation Geared to XR Building Archaeology (Claudius-Anio Novus Aqueduct in Tor Fiscale, the Appia Antica Archaeological ," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-37, June.
    3. Maged Abdel-Tawab & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Nicholas Chileshe & Henry Abanda & Ali Hassan Ali & Avar Almukhtar, 2023. "Building Information Modelling Implementation Model for Sustainable Building Projects in Developing Countries: A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Mennat-Allah El-Husseiny & Hamdy El-Setouhy, 2022. "Reviving Low-Tech Modes of Construction as a Method for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Cristina Cornaro & Gianluigi Bovesecchi & Filippo Calcerano & Letizia Martinelli & Elena Gigliarelli, 2023. "An HBIM Integrated Approach Using Non-Destructive Techniques (NDT) to Support Energy and Environmental Improvement of Built Heritage: The Case Study of Palazzo Maffei Borghese in Rome," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-36, July.
    6. Oludolapo Ibrahim Olanrewaju & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Nicholas Chileshe & David John Edwards, 2021. "Modelling the Impact of Building Information Modelling (BIM) Implementation Drivers and Awareness on Project Lifecycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Raissa Mammoli & Chiara Mariotti & Ramona Quattrini, 2021. "Modeling the Fourth Dimension of Architectural Heritage: Enabling Processes for a Sustainable Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luisa Dias Pereira & Vanessa Tavares & Nelson Soares, 2021. "Up-To-Date Challenges for the Conservation, Rehabilitation and Energy Retrofitting of Higher Education Cultural Heritage Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, February.
    2. Namhyuk Ham & Baek-Il Bae & Ok-Kyung Yuh, 2020. "Phased Reverse Engineering Framework for Sustainable Cultural Heritage Archives Using Laser Scanning and BIM: The Case of the Hwanggungwoo (Seoul, Korea)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Wioletta Knapik & Karol Król, 2023. "Inclusion of Vanishing Cultural Heritage in a Sustainable Rural Development Strategy–Prospects, Opportunities, Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Yasser Yahya Al-Ashmori & Idris Othman & Al-Hussein M. H. Al-Aidrous, 2022. "“Values, Challenges, and Critical Success Factors” of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Malaysia: Experts Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Rui Zhang & Chang Zhang, 2022. "Classification and Application of Digital Technologies in Landscape Heritage Protection," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Flavio Rosa, 2020. "Building-Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) in Historical Buildings: Opportunities and Constraints," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-28, July.
    7. Heng Song & Gehan Selim & Yun Gao, 2023. "Smart Heritage Practice and Its Characteristics Based on Architectural Heritage Conservation—A Case Study of the Management Platform of the Shanghai Federation of Literary and Art Circles China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Lorenzo Diana & Saverio D’Auria & Giovanna Acampa & Giorgia Marino, 2022. "Assessment of Disused Public Buildings: Strategies and Tools for Reuse of Healthcare Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    9. Concepción López-González & Jorge García-Valldecabres, 2023. "The Integration of HBIM-SIG in the Development of a Virtual Itinerary in a Historical Centre," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Ziyi Zhang & Yiquan Zou, 2022. "Research hotspots and trends in heritage building information modeling: A review based on CiteSpace analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Lauren Etxepare & Iñigo Leon & Maialen Sagarna & Iñigo Lizundia & Eneko Jokin Uranga, 2020. "Advanced Intervention Protocol in the Energy Rehabilitation of Heritage Buildings: A Miñones Barracks Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-33, August.
    12. Jaione Korro Bañuelos & Álvaro Rodríguez Miranda & José Manuel Valle-Melón & Ainara Zornoza-Indart & Manuel Castellano-Román & Roque Angulo-Fornos & Francisco Pinto-Puerto & Pilar Acosta Ibáñez & Patr, 2021. "The Role of Information Management for the Sustainable Conservation of Cultural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    13. Fabrizio Banfi & Stefano Roascio & Francesca Romana Paolillo & Mattia Previtali & Fabio Roncoroni & Chiara Stanga, 2022. "Diachronic and Synchronic Analysis for Knowledge Creation: Architectural Representation Geared to XR Building Archaeology (Claudius-Anio Novus Aqueduct in Tor Fiscale, the Appia Antica Archaeological ," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-37, June.
    14. Natalia Lasarte & Peru Elguezabal & Maialen Sagarna & Iñigo Leon & Juan Pedro Otaduy, 2021. "Challenges for Digitalisation in Building Renovation to Enhance the Efficiency of the Process: A Spanish Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, November.
    15. Yuheng Chen & Yanming Wu & Xueyun Sun & Naubada Ali & Qi Zhou, 2023. "Digital Documentation and Conservation of Architectural Heritage Information: An Application in Modern Chinese Architecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    16. Zoë Turner & James Kennell, 2018. "The Role of Sustainable Events in the Management of Historic Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, October.
    17. Ki Pyung Kim & Rob Freda & Tan Hai Dang Nguyen, 2020. "Building Information Modelling Feasibility Study for Building Surveying," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2161-:d:501026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.