IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2361-d753087.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Disused Public Buildings: Strategies and Tools for Reuse of Healthcare Structures

Author

Listed:
  • Lorenzo Diana

    (DICEA—Department of Civil, Building and Environmental Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Saverio D’Auria

    (DICEA—Department of Civil, Building and Environmental Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Giovanna Acampa

    (Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, University of Enna Kore, Cittadella Universitaria, 94100 Enna, Italy
    DIDA—Department of Architecture, University of Florence, 50100 Florence, Italy)

  • Giorgia Marino

    (Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, University of Enna Kore, Cittadella Universitaria, 94100 Enna, Italy)

Abstract

The aim of this paper, in line with the 2030 European Agenda and 2021 Italian “Recovery and Resilience Plan” objectives, is to define an evaluation methodology and tool to support public administrations to detect buildings, currently unused or underused, that might be apt for transformation interventions. The focus is on historical Italian healthcare buildings since these show widespread decay and neglect. A five-step methodology has been developed: screening of public assets; classification, evaluation, and identification of buildings, based on the “potential index”; GIS mapping and inventory; selection of buildings for in-depth analysis; BIM digitization and definition of the “transformability index”. In the fifth phase, an evaluation tool is integrated into the BIM software to automatically calculate the transformability index of each building using six indicators: usability, fragmentation, modifiability, roof implementation, external envelope, and window-to-wall ratio. The “transformability index” helps define the most appropriate buildings to intervene with for reuse. Building transformation is connected to construction features and layout organization and it is limited by architectural, structural, and artistic constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenzo Diana & Saverio D’Auria & Giovanna Acampa & Giorgia Marino, 2022. "Assessment of Disused Public Buildings: Strategies and Tools for Reuse of Healthcare Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2361-:d:753087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2361/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2361/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elnaz Farjami & Özlem Olgaç Türker, 2021. "The Extraction of Prerequisite Criteria for Environmentally Certified Adaptive Reuse of Heritage Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Alessia Buda & Ernst Jan de Place Hansen & Alexander Rieser & Emanuela Giancola & Valeria Natalina Pracchi & Sara Mauri & Valentina Marincioni & Virginia Gori & Kalliopi Fouseki & Cristina S. Polo Lóp, 2021. "Conservation-Compatible Retrofit Solutions in Historic Buildings: An Integrated Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Federica Rosso & Arianna Peduzzi & Lorenzo Diana & Stefano Cascone & Carlo Cecere, 2021. "A Sustainable Approach towards the Retrofit of the Public Housing Building Stock: Energy-Architectural Experimental and Numerical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Isabel Jordan-Palomar & Patricia Tzortzopoulos & Jorge García-Valldecabres & Eugenio Pellicer, 2018. "Protocol to Manage Heritage-Building Interventions Using Heritage Building Information Modelling (HBIM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Giovanna Acampa & Lorenzo Diana & Giorgia Marino & Rossella Marmo, 2021. "Assessing the Transformability of Public Housing through BIM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Jolanta Dziembowska-Kowalska & Rolf H. Funck, 2000. "Cultural activities as a location factor in European competition between regions: Concepts and some evidence," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 34(1), pages 1-12.
    7. Mamdooh Alwetaishi & Ashraf Balabel & Ahmed Abdelhafiz & Usama Issa & Ibrahim Sharaky & Amal Shamseldin & Mohammed Al-Surf & Mosleh Al-Harthi & Mohamed Gadi, 2020. "User Thermal Comfort in Historic Buildings: Evaluation of the Potential of Thermal Mass, Orientation, Evaporative Cooling and Ventilation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-23, November.
    8. Tiziana Campisi & Giovanna Acampa & Giorgia Marino & Giovanni Tesoriere, 2020. "Cycling Master Plans in Italy: The I-BIM Feasibility Tool for Cost and Safety Assessments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Conceição da Costa Silva & Alyx Diêgo Oliveira Silva & Emilia Rahnemay Kohlman Rabbani & Luciana H. Alencar & George da Mota Passos Neto & João Pedro Couto & Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez, 2022. "Guidelines for the Implementation of BIM for Post-Occupancy Management of Social Housing in Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Yener Kandogan, 2003. "On Types of Trade,Adjustment of Labor and Welfare Gains During Asymmetric Liberalizations," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 2003-568, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    3. Federico Cinquepalmi & Spartaco Paris & Elisa Pennacchia & Virginia Adele Tiburcio, 2023. "Efficiency and Sustainability: The Role of Digitization in Re-Inhabiting the Existing Building Stock," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Belén Onecha & Alicia Dotor, 2021. "Simulation Method to Assess Thermal Comfort in Historical Buildings with High-Volume Interior Spaces—The Case of the Gothic Basilica of Sta. Maria del Mar in Barcelona," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Robert C. Vella & Charles Yousif & Francisco Javier Rey Martinez & Javier María Rey Hernandez, 2022. "Prioritising Passive Measures over Air Conditioning to Achieve Thermal Comfort in Mediterranean Baroque Churches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Maria Llop & Josep-Maria Arauzo-Carod, 2012. "Economic impact of a new museum on the local economy: “the Gaudí Centre”," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 17-23, March.
    7. Ruben Loon & Tom Gosens & Jan Rouwendal, 2014. "Cultural heritage and the attractiveness of cities: evidence from recreation trips," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 38(3), pages 253-285, August.
    8. Antonio Russo & Myriam Jansen-Verbeke & Jan Van der Borg, 2005. "Mapping the Dynamics of European Culture - Pressure and Opportunities from the European Enlargement," ERSA conference papers ersa05p461, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Anna Lejpras & Andreas Stephan, 2011. "Locational conditions, cooperation, and innovativeness: evidence from research and company spin-offs," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 46(3), pages 543-575, June.
    10. Eleonora Laurini & Mariangela De Vita & Pierluigi De Berardinis, 2021. "Monitoring the Indoor Air Quality: A Case Study of Passive Cooling from Historical Hypogeal Rooms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Tiziana Campisi & Socrates Basbas & Anastasios Skoufas & Nurten Akgün & Dario Ticali & Giovanni Tesoriere, 2020. "The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Resilience of Sustainable Mobility in Sicily," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-24, October.
    12. Daniela-Luminita Constantin & Carmen Beatrice Pauna & Mariana Dragusin & Zizi Goschin & Constanta Bodea, 2011. "The Question of Clusters in Lagging Regions: Do They Really Make the Difference? A Case Study in Romania," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(5), pages 889-910, October.
    13. Metaxas, Theodore, 2004. "Οικονομική Ανάπτυξη, Ανταγωνιστικότητα Και Μάρκετινγκ Της Πόλης: Η Άποψη Των Επιχειρήσεων Της Πόλης Της Λάρισας [Economic development, competitiveness and city marketing: firms' appreciation for th," MPRA Paper 43301, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Juan E. Nieto-Julián & Lenin Lara & Juan Moyano, 2021. "Implementation of a TeamWork-HBIM for the Management and Sustainability of Architectural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    15. Rui Oliveira & Ricardo M.S.F. Almeida & António Figueiredo & Romeu Vicente, 2021. "A Case Study on a Stochastic-Based Optimisation Approach towards the Integration of Photovoltaic Panels in Multi-Residential Social Housing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    16. Jan Růžička & Jakub Veselka & Zdeněk Rudovský & Stanislav Vitásek & Petr Hájek, 2022. "BIM and Automation in Complex Building Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Biancardo, Salvatore Antonio & Gesualdi, Michele & Savastano, Davide & Intignano, Mattia & Henke, Ilaria & Pagliara, Francesca, 2023. "An innovative framework for integrating Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) within Building Information Modeling (BIM)," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    18. Lei Zhang & Shengrui Zhang & Bei Zhou & Yan Huang & Dan Zhao & Shuaiyang Jiao, 2022. "Exploring Unobserved Heterogeneity in Cyclists’ Occupying Motorized Vehicle Lane Behaviors at Different Bike Facility Configurations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-22, January.
    19. Flavio Rosa, 2020. "Building-Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) in Historical Buildings: Opportunities and Constraints," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-28, July.
    20. Marcelle Engler Bridi & Joao Soliman-Junior & Ariovaldo Denis Granja & Patricia Tzortzopoulos & Vanessa Gomes & Doris Catharine Cornelie Knatz Kowaltowski, 2022. "Living Labs in Social Housing Upgrades: Process, Challenges and Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2361-:d:753087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.