IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i13p4598-d846135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diachronic and Synchronic Analysis for Knowledge Creation: Architectural Representation Geared to XR Building Archaeology (Claudius-Anio Novus Aqueduct in Tor Fiscale, the Appia Antica Archaeological Park)

Author

Listed:
  • Fabrizio Banfi

    (ABClab GIcarus, Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via Ponzio 31, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Stefano Roascio

    (Ministero della Cultura Parco Archeologico dell’Appia Antica, Piazza delle Finanze 1, 00185 Roma, Italy)

  • Francesca Romana Paolillo

    (Ministero della Cultura Parco Archeologico dell’Appia Antica, Piazza delle Finanze 1, 00185 Roma, Italy)

  • Mattia Previtali

    (ABClab GIcarus, Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via Ponzio 31, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Fabio Roncoroni

    (ABClab GIcarus, Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via Ponzio 31, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Chiara Stanga

    (ABClab GIcarus, Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via Ponzio 31, 20133 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

This study summarises research progress to identify appropriate quality methodologies for representing, interpreting, and modelling complex contexts such as the Claudian Aqueduct in the Appian Way Archaeological Park. The goal is to intrinsically integrate (embed) geometric survey (Laser scanning and photogrammetric) with the materials and construction techniques (Stratigraphic Units—SU), semantic models in order to support the design with a better understanding of the artefact considered, and also to give indications that can be implemented in the future in a continuous cognitive process. Volume stratigraphic units in the form of architectural drawings, heritage building information modelling (HBIM) and extended reality (XR) environments have been oriented to comparative analyses based on the research case study’s complex morphology. Analysis of geometries’ intersection, construction techniques and materials open up new cognitive scenarios, self-feeding a progressive knowledge and making different studies correlatable, avoiding diaspora or incommunicability. Finally, an extended reality (XR) platform aims to enhance tangible and intangible values through new human-computer interaction and information sharing levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabrizio Banfi & Stefano Roascio & Francesca Romana Paolillo & Mattia Previtali & Fabio Roncoroni & Chiara Stanga, 2022. "Diachronic and Synchronic Analysis for Knowledge Creation: Architectural Representation Geared to XR Building Archaeology (Claudius-Anio Novus Aqueduct in Tor Fiscale, the Appia Antica Archaeological ," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-37, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:13:p:4598-:d:846135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/13/4598/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/13/4598/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juan E. Nieto-Julián & Lenin Lara & Juan Moyano, 2021. "Implementation of a TeamWork-HBIM for the Management and Sustainability of Architectural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Marco Francesco Funari & Ameer Emad Hajjat & Maria Giovanna Masciotta & Daniel V. Oliveira & Paulo B. Lourenço, 2021. "A Parametric Scan-to-FEM Framework for the Digital Twin Generation of Historic Masonry Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Isabel Jordan-Palomar & Patricia Tzortzopoulos & Jorge García-Valldecabres & Eugenio Pellicer, 2018. "Protocol to Manage Heritage-Building Interventions Using Heritage Building Information Modelling (HBIM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Sonja Kolarić & Mladen Vukomanović & Antonio Ramljak, 2022. "Analyzing the Level of Detail of Construction Schedule for Enabling Site Logistics Planning (SLP) in the Building Information Modeling (BIM) Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Ke Xing & Ki Pyung Kim & David Ness, 2020. "Cloud-BIM Enabled Cyber-Physical Data and Service Platforms for Building Component Reuse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-22, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luka Adanič & Sara Guerra de Oliveira & Andrej Tibaut, 2021. "BIM and Mechanical Engineering—A Cross-Disciplinary Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Flavio Rosa, 2020. "Building-Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) in Historical Buildings: Opportunities and Constraints," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-28, July.
    3. Lorenzo Diana & Saverio D’Auria & Giovanna Acampa & Giorgia Marino, 2022. "Assessment of Disused Public Buildings: Strategies and Tools for Reuse of Healthcare Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    4. Jaione Korro Bañuelos & Álvaro Rodríguez Miranda & José Manuel Valle-Melón & Ainara Zornoza-Indart & Manuel Castellano-Román & Roque Angulo-Fornos & Francisco Pinto-Puerto & Pilar Acosta Ibáñez & Patr, 2021. "The Role of Information Management for the Sustainable Conservation of Cultural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Namhyuk Ham & Baek-Il Bae & Ok-Kyung Yuh, 2020. "Phased Reverse Engineering Framework for Sustainable Cultural Heritage Archives Using Laser Scanning and BIM: The Case of the Hwanggungwoo (Seoul, Korea)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Maged Abdel-Tawab & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Nicholas Chileshe & Henry Abanda & Ali Hassan Ali & Avar Almukhtar, 2023. "Building Information Modelling Implementation Model for Sustainable Building Projects in Developing Countries: A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Cristina Cornaro & Gianluigi Bovesecchi & Filippo Calcerano & Letizia Martinelli & Elena Gigliarelli, 2023. "An HBIM Integrated Approach Using Non-Destructive Techniques (NDT) to Support Energy and Environmental Improvement of Built Heritage: The Case Study of Palazzo Maffei Borghese in Rome," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-36, July.
    8. Carmen Marín-Buzón & Antonio Pérez-Romero & José Luis López-Castro & Imed Ben Jerbania & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro, 2021. "Photogrammetry as a New Scientific Tool in Archaeology: Worldwide Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-27, May.
    9. Sultan Çetin & Catherine De Wolf & Nancy Bocken, 2021. "Circular Digital Built Environment: An Emerging Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-34, June.
    10. Juan E. Nieto-Julián & Lenin Lara & Juan Moyano, 2021. "Implementation of a TeamWork-HBIM for the Management and Sustainability of Architectural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    11. Oludolapo Ibrahim Olanrewaju & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Nicholas Chileshe & David John Edwards, 2021. "Modelling the Impact of Building Information Modelling (BIM) Implementation Drivers and Awareness on Project Lifecycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.
    12. Concepción López-González & Jorge García-Valldecabres, 2023. "The Integration of HBIM-SIG in the Development of a Virtual Itinerary in a Historical Centre," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Ziyi Zhang & Yiquan Zou, 2022. "Research hotspots and trends in heritage building information modeling: A review based on CiteSpace analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Luisa Dias Pereira & Vanessa Tavares & Nelson Soares, 2021. "Up-To-Date Challenges for the Conservation, Rehabilitation and Energy Retrofitting of Higher Education Cultural Heritage Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, February.
    15. Lauren Etxepare & Iñigo Leon & Maialen Sagarna & Iñigo Lizundia & Eneko Jokin Uranga, 2020. "Advanced Intervention Protocol in the Energy Rehabilitation of Heritage Buildings: A Miñones Barracks Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-33, August.
    16. Mennat-Allah El-Husseiny & Hamdy El-Setouhy, 2022. "Reviving Low-Tech Modes of Construction as a Method for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Raissa Mammoli & Chiara Mariotti & Ramona Quattrini, 2021. "Modeling the Fourth Dimension of Architectural Heritage: Enabling Processes for a Sustainable Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Atiq Zaman, 2022. "Waste Management 4.0: An Application of a Machine Learning Model to Identify and Measure Household Waste Contamination—A Case Study in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Natalia Lasarte & Peru Elguezabal & Maialen Sagarna & Iñigo Leon & Juan Pedro Otaduy, 2021. "Challenges for Digitalisation in Building Renovation to Enhance the Efficiency of the Process: A Spanish Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, November.
    20. Zoë Turner & James Kennell, 2018. "The Role of Sustainable Events in the Management of Historic Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:13:p:4598-:d:846135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.