IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p12139-d671304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges for Digitalisation in Building Renovation to Enhance the Efficiency of the Process: A Spanish Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Lasarte

    (TECNALIA, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Astondo Bidea, Edificio 700, Parque tecnológico de Bizkaia, 48160 Derio, Spain)

  • Peru Elguezabal

    (TECNALIA, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Astondo Bidea, Edificio 700, Parque tecnológico de Bizkaia, 48160 Derio, Spain)

  • Maialen Sagarna

    (Department of Architecture, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Plaza Oñati 2, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain)

  • Iñigo Leon

    (Department of Architecture, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Plaza Oñati 2, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain)

  • Juan Pedro Otaduy

    (Department of Architecture, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Plaza Oñati 2, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain)

Abstract

Although construction is one of the largest industries in the world, it is one of the least digitised and its productivity is still very low. Excesses of time and cost are common and are even more accentuated for building renovation. Recently, the building information modeling (BIM) methodology has strongly entered in the construction sector and appears to be an effective paradigm shift. Considering all of the previously mentioned aspects, this article addresses the identification and analysis of the critical barriers of renovation and the potential for digitalisation to overcome them using BIM. The methodology that was used is based on an open innovation approach called Living Labs, where consultations with the key stakeholders of the construction process aims for a higher digitalisation to focus on real needs and fitted to the user’s requirements. Starting from a worldwide survey, the analysis of the Spanish casuistry is deepened. From the analysis of barriers and opportunities, the necessary requirements for an optimal BIM application in renovation are highlighted. After identifying the key aspects that each stakeholder’ typology has considered as relevant, a set of key performance indicators have been selected, to monitor the improvements in the renovation process when BIM is adopted.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Lasarte & Peru Elguezabal & Maialen Sagarna & Iñigo Leon & Juan Pedro Otaduy, 2021. "Challenges for Digitalisation in Building Renovation to Enhance the Efficiency of the Process: A Spanish Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12139-:d:671304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12139/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12139/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carolina Cruz Villazón & Leonardo Sastoque Pinilla & José Ramón Otegi Olaso & Nerea Toledo Gandarias & Norberto López de Lacalle, 2020. "Identification of Key Performance Indicators in Project-Based Organisations through the Lean Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Justus Von Geibler & Lorenz Erdmann & Christa Liedtke & Holger Rohn & Matthias Stabe & Simon Berner & Kristin Leismann & Kathrin Schnalzer & Katharina Kennedy, 2014. "Exploring the Potential of a German Living Lab Research Infrastructure for the Development of Low Resource Products and Services," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Isabel Jordan-Palomar & Patricia Tzortzopoulos & Jorge García-Valldecabres & Eugenio Pellicer, 2018. "Protocol to Manage Heritage-Building Interventions Using Heritage Building Information Modelling (HBIM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Abdullahi Ahmed & Danny McGough & Monica Mateo-Garcia, 2017. "Testing innovative technologies for retrofitting: Coventry University as a living lab," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 4(3), pages 257-270, March.
    5. Jin-Up Kim & Oussama A. Hadadi & Hyunjoo Kim & Jonghyeob Kim, 2018. "Development of A BIM-Based Maintenance Decision-Making Framework for the Optimization between Energy Efficiency and Investment Costs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martina Signorini & Chiara Gatto & Jacopo Cassandro & Alberto Pavan & Sonia Lupica Spagnolo, 2025. "Cost Efficiency in Buildings: An Ontological Perspective for Sustainable Life Cycle Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Kristina Galjanić & Ivan Marović & Nikša Jajac, 2022. "Decision Support Systems for Managing Construction Projects: A Scientific Evolution Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Marco Pau & Panagiotis Kapsalis & Zhiyu Pan & George Korbakis & Dario Pellegrino & Antonello Monti, 2022. "MATRYCS—A Big Data Architecture for Advanced Services in the Building Domain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Min Ho Shin & Hye Kyung Lee & Hwan Yong Kim, 2018. "Benefit–Cost Analysis of Building Information Modeling (BIM) in a Railway Site," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-10, November.
    2. Flavio Rosa, 2020. "Building-Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) in Historical Buildings: Opportunities and Constraints," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-28, July.
    3. Rosa M. Llácer-Iglesias & P. Amparo López-Jiménez & Modesto Pérez-Sánchez, 2021. "Energy Self-Sufficiency Aiming for Sustainable Wastewater Systems: Are All Options Being Explored?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Jaroslav Vrchota & Petr Řehoř & Monika Maříková & Martin Pech, 2020. "Critical Success Factors of the Project Management in Relation to Industry 4.0 for Sustainability of Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Andreja Pucihar & Iztok Zajc & Radovan Sernec & Gregor Lenart, 2019. "Living Lab as an Ecosystem for Development, Demonstration and Assessment of Autonomous Mobility Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Lorenzo Diana & Saverio D’Auria & Giovanna Acampa & Giorgia Marino, 2022. "Assessment of Disused Public Buildings: Strategies and Tools for Reuse of Healthcare Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    7. Hafiz Wasim Akram & Samreen Akhtar & Alam Ahmad & Imran Anwar & Mohammad Ali Bait Ali Sulaiman, 2023. "Developing a Conceptual Framework Model for Effective Perishable Food Cold-Supply-Chain Management Based on Structured Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, March.
    8. Kristo Karjust & Marmar Mehrparvar & Sergei Kaganski & Tõnis Raamets, 2025. "Development of a Sustainability-Oriented KPI Selection Model for Manufacturing Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Kizielewicz Joanna & Winiarska Magdalena & Skrzeszewska Katarzyna & Szelągowska-Rudzka Katarzyna, 2022. "Efficiency of project management in higher education establishments on the example of Gdynia Maritime University," Management, Sciendo, vol. 26(1), pages 164-188, January.
    10. Jaione Korro Bañuelos & Álvaro Rodríguez Miranda & José Manuel Valle-Melón & Ainara Zornoza-Indart & Manuel Castellano-Román & Roque Angulo-Fornos & Francisco Pinto-Puerto & Pilar Acosta Ibáñez & Patr, 2021. "The Role of Information Management for the Sustainable Conservation of Cultural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    11. Namhyuk Ham & Baek-Il Bae & Ok-Kyung Yuh, 2020. "Phased Reverse Engineering Framework for Sustainable Cultural Heritage Archives Using Laser Scanning and BIM: The Case of the Hwanggungwoo (Seoul, Korea)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Salvatore Monni & Francesco Palumbo & Manuela Tvaronavičienė, 2017. "Cluster performance: an attempt to evaluate the Lithuanian case," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(1), pages 43-57, September.
    13. Hacer Tercanli & Ben Jongbloed, 2022. "A Systematic Review of the Literature on Living Labs in Higher Education Institutions: Potentials and Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, September.
    14. Eugenia Panfiluk & Elżbieta Szymańska, 2017. "The measurement of the innovativeness of health tourism services using an adequacy matrix title of the article," Post-Print hal-01860905, HAL.
    15. McCarty, J. & Waibel, C. & Leow, S.W. & Schlueter, A., 2025. "Solar energy in the city: Data-driven review on urban photovoltaics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    16. Marcus Sandberg & Jani Mukkavaara & Farshid Shadram & Thomas Olofsson, 2019. "Multidisciplinary Optimization of Life-Cycle Energy and Cost Using a BIM-Based Master Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Ki Pyung Kim & Rob Freda & Tan Hai Dang Nguyen, 2020. "Building Information Modelling Feasibility Study for Building Surveying," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Maria Conceição da Costa Silva & Alyx Diêgo Oliveira Silva & Emilia Rahnemay Kohlman Rabbani & Luciana H. Alencar & George da Mota Passos Neto & João Pedro Couto & Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez, 2022. "Guidelines for the Implementation of BIM for Post-Occupancy Management of Social Housing in Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    19. He, Jigang & Gao, Hongli & Li, Shichao & Guo, Liang & Lei, Yuncong & Cao, Ao, 2024. "An intelligent maintenance decision-making based on cutters economic life," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    20. Najiba El Amrani El Idrissi & Ilham Zerrouk & Naoual Zerrari & Salvatore Monni, 2020. "Comparative study between two innovative clusters in Morocco and Italy," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 2(1), pages 400-417, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12139-:d:671304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.