IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i3p1088-d484489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improved Vulnerability Assessment Table for Retaining Walls and Embankments from a Working-Level Perspective in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Jaejoon Lee

    (Interdisciplinary Program in Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 2066, Korea)

  • Hyunji Lee

    (Interdisciplinary Program in Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 2066, Korea)

  • Hongsik Yun

    (School of Civil, Architectural Engineering & Landscape Architecture, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 2066, Korea)

  • Chol Kang

    (Societal Disaster Response Policy Division, Ministry of the Interior and Safety, Sejong 30128, Korea)

  • Moonsoo Song

    (Interdisciplinary Program in Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 2066, Korea)

Abstract

Climate change can lead to unpredictable slope collapse, which causes human casualties. Therefore, Korea has devoted significant effort to the management of slope disasters. The Ministry of the Interior and Safety of Korea, which oversees the safety of the nation’s people, has allocated a four-year budget of $557 million to investigate, assess, and maintain steep slope sites. However, there have been fatalities caused by steep slope site evaluations based on inadequate knowledge and a single retaining walls and embankments (RW&E) assessment table. Therefore, the assessment table for RW&E-type steep slopes needs to be improved in terms of its accuracy, simplicity, and ease of use. In this study, domestic and global evaluation methods were reviewed, problems associated with the existing RW&E assessment table were identified, and a focus group interview was conducted. The RW&E assessment table was improved through an indicator feasibility survey and analytic hierarchy processing. The improved assessment table was categorized from one to four classifications to reduce the ambiguity of the evaluation: concrete, reinforced soil-retaining walls, stone embankments, and gabions. This study will provide the sustainability of slope safety and serve as a reference for classification and evaluation criteria across all national institutions that conduct RW&E evaluations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaejoon Lee & Hyunji Lee & Hongsik Yun & Chol Kang & Moonsoo Song, 2021. "Improved Vulnerability Assessment Table for Retaining Walls and Embankments from a Working-Level Perspective in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1088-:d:484489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1088/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1088/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Forman, Ernest H., 1990. "Random indices for incomplete pairwise comparison matrices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 153-155, September.
    2. Fatemeh Zahedi, 1986. "The Analytic Hierarchy Process---A Survey of the Method and its Applications," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 96-108, August.
    3. Hai-Min Lyu & Jack Shuilong Shen & Arul Arulrajah, 2018. "Assessment of Geohazards and Preventative Countermeasures Using AHP Incorporated with GIS in Lanzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Banai, Reza, 2010. "Evaluation of land use-transportation systems with the Analytic Network Process," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 3(1), pages 85-112.
    2. Xi-Cun He & Tian-Liang Yang & Shui-Long Shen & Ye-Shuang Xu & Arul Arulrajah, 2019. "Land Subsidence Control Zone and Policy for the Environmental Protection of Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-13, July.
    3. V.M. Rao Tummala & Hong Ling, 1998. "A Note on the Computation of the Mean Random Consistency Index of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (Ahp)," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 221-230, June.
    4. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    5. Hai-Min Lyu & Ye-Shuang Xu & Wen-Chieh Cheng & Arul Arulrajah, 2018. "Flooding Hazards across Southern China and Prospective Sustainability Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Chetan A. Jhaveri & Jitendra M. Nenavani, 2020. "Evaluation of eTail Services Quality: AHP Approach," Vision, , vol. 24(3), pages 310-319, September.
    7. Xinyao Li & Lingzhi Wang & Bryan Pijanowski & Lingpeng Pan & Hichem Omrani & Anqi Liang & Yi Qu, 2022. "The Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Transition Mode of Recessive Cultivated Land Use Morphology in the Huaibei Region of the Jiangsu Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Andre Bender & Allan Din & Philippe Favarger & Martin Hoesli & Janne Laakso, 1997. "An Analysis of Perceptions Concerning the Environmental Quality of Housing in Geneva," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(3), pages 503-513, March.
    9. Karnes, Carol L. & Sridharan, Sri V & Kanet, John J., 1995. "Measuring quality from the consumer's perspective: A methodology and its application," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 215-225, May.
    10. Cristina López & Rocío Ruíz-Benítez & Carmen Vargas-Machuca, 2019. "On the Environmental and Social Sustainability of Technological Innovations in Urban Bus Transport: The EU Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Mustafa Dinc, 2015. "Introduction to Regional Economic Development," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 16749.
    12. Stanislav Shmelev & Harrison Roger Brook, 2021. "Macro Sustainability across Countries: Key Sector Environmentally Extended Input-Output Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-46, October.
    13. Ormerod, Richard J. & Ulrich, Werner, 2013. "Operational research and ethics: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 291-307.
    14. Zeki Ayağ, 2016. "An integrated approach to concept evaluation in a new product development," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 991-1005, October.
    15. Hartvigsen, David, 2005. "Representing the strengths and directions of pairwise comparisons," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(2), pages 357-369, June.
    16. S. Lipovetsky, 2009. "Global Priority Estimation in Multiperson Decision Making," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 77-91, January.
    17. Mohamed Hanine & Omar Boutkhoum & Tarik Agouti & Abdessadek Tikniouine, 2017. "A new integrated methodology using modified Delphi-fuzzy AHP-PROMETHEE for Geospatial Business Intelligence selection," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 897-925, November.
    18. Chun, Young H. & Sumichrast, Robert T., 2006. "A rank-based approach to the sequential selection and assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 1338-1344, October.
    19. Shang-Yung Yen & Shu-Mei Tang & Wei-Chih Wu, 2013. "An Investigation of Key Successful Factors of Biotechnological Industry Performance in Taiwan," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    20. Vincent F. Yu & Hsiu-I Ting, 2009. "Identifying key factors affecting consumers' choice of wealth management services: an AHP approach," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 929-939, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1088-:d:484489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.