IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i3p1055-d483878.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of the Role of Social Media for the Cultural Heritage Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoxu Liang

    (Department of Architecture and Design, Politecnico di Torino, 10125 Turin, Italy)

  • Yanjun Lu

    (School of Architecture & Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China)

  • John Martin

    (Sustainable Earth Institute, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK)

Abstract

During the last 20 years, with the development of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), an emerging interest has appeared in Digital Community Engagement (DCE) in the process of cultural heritage management. Due to a growing need to involve a broader community in the Historic Urban Landscape approach, social media are considered one of the most important platforms to promote the public participation process of urban heritage conservation in the context of rapid urbanization. Despite the growing literature on DCE, which has delivered a general overview of different digital technologies and platforms to enhance heritage conservation, little research has been done on taking stock of the utilization of social media in this process. This study aims to fill the research gap by providing a more comprehensive picture of the functionalities of social media platforms and their impacts on sustainable urban development through a systematic literature review. As a result, 19 out of 248 DCE relevant articles are selected as objects to illustrate the contribution of social media. The study identified the characteristics of these applied social media tools, explores their roles and influences in cases. The article concludes that social media offers a platform for a wider range of stakeholders to have a voice in the decision process of cultural heritage management, and it should be widely applied to encourage citizens from all over the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoxu Liang & Yanjun Lu & John Martin, 2021. "A Review of the Role of Social Media for the Cultural Heritage Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1055-:d:483878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1055/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1055/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pilvi Nummi, 2018. "Crowdsourcing Local Knowledge with PPGIS and Social Media for Urban Planning to Reveal Intangible Cultural Heritage," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 100-115.
    2. Brian J. Shaw & Hélène Draux & María García Martín & John Martin & Claudia Bieling, 2017. "Contributions of citizen science to landscape democracy: potentials and challenges of current approaches," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(8), pages 831-844, November.
    3. Angelo Corallo & Anna Trono & Laura Fortunato & Francesco Pettinato & Laura Schina, 2018. "Cultural Event Management and Urban e-Planning Through Bottom-Up User Participation," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 7(1), pages 15-33, January.
    4. Michael J. Magro, 2012. "A Review of Social Media Use in E-Government," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Erik Champion & Hafizur Rahaman, 2019. "3D Digital Heritage Models as Sustainable Scholarly Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-8, April.
    6. Reinout Kleinhans & Maarten Van Ham & Jennifer Evans-Cowley, 2015. "Using Social Media and Mobile Technologies to Foster Engagement and Self-Organization in Participatory Urban Planning and Neighbourhood Governance," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 237-247, June.
    7. Ken Taylor, 2016. "The Historic Urban Landscape paradigm and cities as cultural landscapes. Challenging orthodoxy in urban conservation," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 471-480, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rui Zhang & Chang Zhang, 2022. "Classification and Application of Digital Technologies in Landscape Heritage Protection," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Ángeles Layuno Rosas & Jorge Magaz-Molina, 2023. "Contributions of Social Media to the Recognition, Assessment, Conservation, and Communication of Spanish Post-Industrial Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Nisar Ali Khan & Camillo Nuti & Giorgio Monti & Mario Micheli, 2022. "Critical Review of Pakistani Current Legislation on Sustainable Protection of Cultural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Alfred Krogmann & Peter Ivanič & Hilda Kramáreková & Lucia Petrikovičová & František Petrovič & Henrich Grežo, 2021. "Cultural Tourism in Nitra, Slovakia: Overview of Current and Future Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Magdalena Roszczyńska-Kurasińska & Anna Domaradzka & Bartosz Ślosarski & Agata Żbikowska, 2021. "Facebook Data as Part of Cultural Heritage Investments Toolbox: Pilot Analysis of Users Interests and Preferences Concerning Adaptive Reuse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Youssef El Archi & Brahim Benbba & Kai Zhu & Zineb El Andaloussi & László Pataki & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Mapping the Nexus between Sustainability and Digitalization in Tourist Destinations: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    7. María Antonia Diaz Mendoza & Emiro De La Hoz Franco & Jorge Eliecer Gómez Gómez, 2023. "Technologies for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage—A Systematic Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-28, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enzo Falco & Reinout Kleinhans, 2018. "Digital Participatory Platforms for Co-Production in Urban Development: A Systematic Review," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 7(3), pages 52-79, July.
    2. Suling Guo & Wei Sun & Wen Chen & Jianxin Zhang & Peixue Liu, 2021. "Impact of Artificial Elements on Mountain Landscape Perception: An Eye-Tracking Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    3. James Charlton & Ian Babelon & Richard Watson & Caitlin Hafferty, 2023. "Phygitally Smarter? A Critically Pragmatic Agenda for Smarter Engagement in British Planning and Beyond," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 17-31.
    4. Pusp Raj Joshi & Shareeful Islam & Syed Islam, 2017. "A Framework for Cloud Based E-Government from the Perspective of Developing Countries," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-26, November.
    5. Juan A. García-Esparza, 2022. "Urban Scene Protection and Unconventional Practices—Contemporary Landscapes in World Heritage Cities of Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Min Yin & Jiangang Xu & Zhongyuan Yang, 2019. "Preliminary Research on Planning of Decentralizing Ancient Towns in Small-Scale Famous Historic and Cultural Cities with a Case Study of Tingchow County, Fujian Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Erik Glaas & Mattias Hjerpe & Martin Karlson & Tina-Simone Neset, 2020. "Visualization for Citizen Participation: User Perceptions on a Mainstreamed Online Participatory Tool and Its Usefulness for Climate Change Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Alaa Bakur, 2017. "Hearing Foreigners’ Voices: Unprecedented Communication for Hearing Foreigners’ Voices in Saudi Arabia," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(12), pages 1-9, December.
    9. Špaček David, 2018. "Social Media Use in Public Administration: The Case of Facebook Use by Czech Regions," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 199-218, December.
    10. John Martin & Dominica Williamson & Klara Łucznik & John Adam Guy, 2021. "Development of the My Cult-Rural Toolkit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Supunmali Ahangama, 2023. "Relating Social Media Diffusion, Education Level and Cybersecurity Protection Mechanisms to E-Participation Initiatives: Insights from a Cross-Country Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 1695-1711, October.
    12. Di Zuo & Changrong Li & Mingliang Lin & Pinyu Chen & Xiang Kong, 2022. "Tourism, Residents Agent Practice and Traditional Residential Landscapes at a Cultural Heritage Site: The Case Study of Hongcun Village, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    13. Wojciech Samól & Szymon Kowalski & Arkadiusz Woźniakowski & Piotr Samól, 2023. "Where the Second World War in Europe Broke Out: The Landscape History of Westerplatte, Gdańsk/Danzig," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, March.
    14. Xiaoxu Liang & Naisi Hua & John Martin & Elena Dellapiana & Cristina Coscia & Yu Zhang, 2022. "Social Media as a Medium to Promote Local Perception Expression in China’s World Heritage Sites," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Sara Peinado-Santana & Patricia Hernández-Lamas & Jorge Bernabéu-Larena & Beatriz Cabau-Anchuelo & José Antonio Martín-Caro, 2021. "Public Works Heritage 3D Model Digitisation, Optimisation and Dissemination with Free and Open-Source Software and Platforms and Low-Cost Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Xian Ji & Long Shao & Yu Du, 2020. "Collaborating with Local Communities to Identify Improvement Priorities for Historic Urban Landscape Based on Residents’ Satisfaction: An Application of Asymmetric Impact-Performance Analysis in Dando," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    17. Maria Hellman & Eva-Karin Olsson & Charlotte Wagnsson, 2016. "EU Armed Forces’ Use of Social Media in Areas of Deployment," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 51-62.
    18. Matthew Hayes, 2020. "The coloniality of UNESCO’s heritage urban landscapes: Heritage process and transnational gentrification in Cuenca, Ecuador," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(15), pages 3060-3077, November.
    19. Willemien Laenens & Wendy Van den Broeck & Ilse Mariën, 2018. "Channel Choice Determinants of (Digital) Government Communication: A Case Study of Spatial Planning in Flanders," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 140-152.
    20. Quan Li & Wenbo Wei & Nian Xiong & Daici Feng & Xinyue Ye & Yongsheng Jiang, 2017. "Social Media Research, Human Behavior, and Sustainable Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1055-:d:483878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.