IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13471-d695890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Model for Calculating the Spatial Coverage of Audible Disaster Warnings Using GTFS Realtime Data

Author

Listed:
  • Akihiko Nishino

    (Graduate School of System Design and Management, Keio University, Yokohama 223-8526, Kanagawa, Japan)

  • Akira Kodaka

    (Graduate School of System Design and Management, Keio University, Yokohama 223-8526, Kanagawa, Japan)

  • Madoka Nakajima

    (Graduate School of System Design and Management, Keio University, Yokohama 223-8526, Kanagawa, Japan)

  • Naohiko Kohtake

    (Graduate School of System Design and Management, Keio University, Yokohama 223-8526, Kanagawa, Japan)

Abstract

In the event of a large-scale disaster, the dissemination of audible disaster warning information via sirens is effective in ensuring a rapid response. Sirens can be installed not only on fixed towers, but also on public transport and other vehicles passing through residential areas, and at spots where residents congregate, to increase area coverage. Although models to calculate the spatial coverage of audible information delivered from fixed sirens have been constructed, no general-purpose model has been developed to assess the delivery from vehicles. In this study, we focused on the General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS), which is an open format for geospatial information on public transport. We conducted a spatial analysis using a geographic information system (GIS) on the basis of the acquired bus location information. We developed a model to calculate the spatial coverage of the audible information delivery for overlapping hazard maps and population. Assuming a flood occurred in the vicinity of Brisbane Central Station, Queensland, Australia, we confirmed that the developed model was capable of characterizing the time-series changes in the exposed population in the target area. Since the GTFS format is currently distributed across various countries, this assessment model is considered to be highly versatile and widely applicable.

Suggested Citation

  • Akihiko Nishino & Akira Kodaka & Madoka Nakajima & Naohiko Kohtake, 2021. "A Model for Calculating the Spatial Coverage of Audible Disaster Warnings Using GTFS Realtime Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13471-:d:695890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13471/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13471/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhihui Wang & Wenyi Yao & Ming Wang & Peiqing Xiao & Jishan Yang & Pan Zhang & Qiuhong Tang & Xiangbing Kong & Jie Wu, 2019. "The Influence of River Channel Occupation on Urban Inundation and Sedimentation Induced by Floodwater in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study in the Loess Plateau, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Sagar Ratna Bajracharya & Narendra Raj Khanal & Pashupati Nepal & Sundar Kumar Rai & Pawan Kumar Ghimire & Neera Shrestha Pradhan, 2021. "Community Assessment of Flood Risks and Early Warning System in Ratu Watershed, Koshi Basin, Nepal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Vieri Tarchiani & Giovanni Massazza & Maurizio Rosso & Maurizio Tiepolo & Alessandro Pezzoli & Mohamed Housseini Ibrahim & Gaptia Lawan Katiellou & Paolo Tamagnone & Tiziana De Filippis & Leandro Rocc, 2020. "Community and Impact Based Early Warning System for Flood Risk Preparedness: The Experience of the Sirba River in Niger," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Jinjoo Bok & Youngsang Kwon, 2016. "Comparable Measures of Accessibility to Public Transport Using the General Transit Feed Specification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piotr Kaszczyszyn & Natalia Sypion-Dutkowska, 2019. "Walking Access to Public Transportation Stops for City Residents. A Comparison of Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Sagar Ratna Bajracharya & Narendra Raj Khanal & Pashupati Nepal & Sundar Kumar Rai & Pawan Kumar Ghimire & Neera Shrestha Pradhan, 2021. "Community Assessment of Flood Risks and Early Warning System in Ratu Watershed, Koshi Basin, Nepal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Goliszek Sławomir, 2022. "The potential accessibility to workplaces and working-age population by means of public and private car transport in Szczecin," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 26(1), pages 31-41, January.
    4. L. Samková, 2023. "Management of integrated passenger transport system and its role in tourism development," Economics Working Papers 2023-03, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Economics.
    5. Bwire, Hannibal & Zengo, Emil, 2020. "Comparison of efficiency between public and private transport modes using excess commuting: An experience in Dar es Salaam," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Vergel-Tovar, C. Erik & Leape, Jonathan & Villegas Carrasquilla, Mónica & Peñas Arana, Maria Claudia & Toro Gonzalez, Daniel & Canon Rubiano, Leonardo & Salas Barón, Eliana & Martinez, Paulo, 2022. "Mapping the transit network of greater Cartagena with mobile phones: Coverage, accessibility, and informality," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    7. Helena M. Ramos & Mohsen Besharat, 2021. "Urban Flood Risk and Economic Viability Analyses of a Smart Sustainable Drainage System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Sławomir Goliszek, 2021. "GIS tools and programming languages for creating models of public and private transport potential accessibility in Szczecin, Poland," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 115-137, January.
    9. Marcin Jacek Kłos & Grzegorz Sierpiński, 2023. "Strategy for the Siting of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations for Parcel Delivery Service Providers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Joshi, Saakshi & Bailey, Ajay & Datta, Anindita, 2021. "On the move? Exploring constraints to accessing urban mobility infrastructures," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 61-74.
    11. Wenyan Pan & Mengwei Yan & Zhikun Zhao & Muhammad Awais Gulzar, 2022. "Flood Risk Assessment and Management in Urban Communities: The Case of Communities in Wuhan," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Andrea Galligari & Fabio Giulio Tonolo & Giovanni Massazza, 2020. "Floodplain Settlement Dynamics in the Maouri Dallol at Guéchémé, Niger: A Multidisciplinary Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    13. Fan Yang & Suwen Xiong & Jiangang Ou & Ziyu Zhao & Ting Lei, 2022. "Human Settlement Resilience Zoning and Optimizing Strategies for River-Network Cities under Flood Risk Management Objectives: Taking Yueyang City as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, August.
    14. Prasanta K. Sahu & Babak Mehran & Surya P. Mahapatra & Satish Sharma, 2021. "Spatial data analysis approach for network-wide consolidation of bus stop locations," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 375-394, June.
    15. Athanasios-Alexandru Gavrilidis & Andreea Nita & Mihaita-Iulian Niculae, 2020. "Assessing the Potential Conflict Occurrence Due to Metropolitan Transportation Planning: A Proposed Quantitative Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    16. Adrian Barchański & Renata Żochowska & Marcin Jacek Kłos, 2022. "A Method for the Identification of Critical Interstop Sections in Terms of Introducing Electric Buses in Public Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-37, October.
    17. Moyano, Amparo & Moya-Gómez, Borja & Gutiérrez, Javier, 2018. "Access and egress times to high-speed rail stations: a spatiotemporal accessibility analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 84-93.
    18. Yenisetty, Pavan Teja & Bahadure, Pankaj, 2021. "Assessing accessibility to ASFs from bus stops using distance measures: Case of two Indian cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    19. Maurizio Tiepolo & Sarah Braccio, 2020. "Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction into Local Development Plans for Rural Tropical Africa: A Systematic Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    20. Mansour, Shawky & Alahmadi, Mohammed & Abulibdeh, Ammar, 2022. "Spatial assessment of audience accessibility to historical monuments and museums in Qatar during the 2022 FIFA World Cup," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 116-129.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13471-:d:695890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.