IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p12169-d671949.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aggregated Risk Assessment and Survey for Risk Reduction in Oil Terminals

Author

Listed:
  • Robertas Alzbutas

    (Lithuanian Energy Institute, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Mindaugas Vaisnoras

    (Lithuanian Energy Institute, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Inga Saruniene

    (Lithuanian Energy Institute, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Ricardas Krikstolaitis

    (Lithuanian Energy Institute, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Mindaugas Valincius

    (Lithuanian Energy Institute, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Egidijus Babilas

    (Lithuanian Energy Institute, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Juozas Augutis

    (Lithuanian Energy Institute, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Sigitas Rimkevicius

    (Lithuanian Energy Institute, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Tomas Iesmantas

    (Lithuanian Energy Institute, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Feliksas Anusauskas

    (Coastal Research and Planning Institute, LT-92221 Klaipeda, Lithuania)

  • Lauras Mataitis

    (Klaipedos Nafta AB, LT-92276 Klaipeda, Lithuania)

Abstract

One of the goals of any oil terminal is to make a business while avoiding hazardous events and harmful effects for both humans and the environment. This can be achieved by creating a safe working place as well as by performing safe and acceptable activities regarding the impact on surrounding objects, including residential and industrial areas. The aim of the hazard analysis of the oil terminal is to assess the risks related to hazardous events or phenomena and to evaluate whether the assessed risks are acceptable. The hazard analysis and assessment of risk are also used for risk reduction while examining and limiting hazardous scenarios that, for instance, involve the loss-of-containment of flammable or combustible material. In this paper, the authors aim to contribute to risk research by providing a comprehensive methodology of risk assessment for oil terminals with case study results and discussion on features of the methodology, risk aggregation, its applicability for risk reduction, and industrial interests. The performed study considered the “Klaipedos Nafta AB” (an operator of the Klaipeda Oil Terminal, Lithuania) case study regarding hazardous materials that might be released from various tanks, devices, and associated pipelines. The performed quantitative risk assessment has enabled the determination of the probability regarding whether releases would ignite and, for instance, cause explosion. In the case study, the estimate of probability, i.e., the frequency, and the possible consequences of the hazardous events were evaluated, and both mitigation and risk reduction measures were also considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Robertas Alzbutas & Mindaugas Vaisnoras & Inga Saruniene & Ricardas Krikstolaitis & Mindaugas Valincius & Egidijus Babilas & Juozas Augutis & Sigitas Rimkevicius & Tomas Iesmantas & Feliksas Anusauska, 2021. "Aggregated Risk Assessment and Survey for Risk Reduction in Oil Terminals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12169-:d:671949
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12169/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12169/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaradat, Ra’ed M. & Keating, Charles B., 2014. "Fragility of oil as a critical infrastructure problem," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 86-99.
    2. Daniel Sarewitz & Roger Pielke & Mojdeh Keykhah, 2003. "Vulnerability and Risk: Some Thoughts from a Political and Policy Perspective," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(4), pages 805-810, August.
    3. Panagiotis K. Marhavilas & Michail Filippidis & Georgios K. Koulinas & Dimitrios E. Koulouriotis, 2020. "A HAZOP with MCDM Based Risk-Assessment Approach: Focusing on the Deviations with Economic/Health/Environmental Impacts in a Process Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-29, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suleyman Enes Hacibektasoglu & Bulent Mertoglu & Hakan Tozan, 2021. "Application of a Novel Hybrid f-SC Risk Analysis Method in the Paint Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Mengying Cui & David Levinson, 2018. "Accessibility analysis of risk severity," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1029-1050, July.
    3. Gabe Mythen, 2021. "The Critical Theory of World Risk Society: A Retrospective Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 533-543, March.
    4. Gianpaolo Di Bona & Antonio Forcina & Domenico Falcone & Luca Silvestri, 2020. "Critical Risks Method (CRM): A New Safety Allocation Approach for a Critical Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Nicolas Rossignol & Pierre Delvenne & Catrinel Turcanu, 2015. "Rethinking Vulnerability Analysis and Governance with Emphasis on a Participatory Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(1), pages 129-141, January.
    6. Balikisu Osman, 2023. "Climate and Food Insecurity Risks: Identifying Exposure and Vulnerabilities in the Post-Food Production System of Northern Ghana," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Mastronardi, Luigi & Cavallo, Aurora & Romagnoli, Luca, 2022. "A novel composite environmental fragility index to analyse Italian ecoregions’ vulnerability," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    8. Edris Alam & Md Sabur Khan & Roquia Salam, 2022. "Vulnerability assessment based on household views from the Dammar Char in Southeastern Bangladesh," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(1), pages 329-344, August.
    9. Tahseen AL-Saadi & Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Tatyana Semenova, 2022. "Iraq Oil Industry Infrastructure Development in the Conditions of the Global Economy Turbulence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-29, August.
    10. P. Ding & M. D. Gerst & A. Bernstein & R. B. Howarth & M. E. Borsuk, 2012. "Rare Disasters and Risk Attitudes: International Differences and Implications for Integrated Assessment Modeling," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(11), pages 1846-1855, November.
    11. Alessandra Faggian & Marco Modica, 2020. "Natural disasters and the economy," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 40(2), pages 107-111, October.
    12. Horia-Nicolai L. Teodorescu, 2015. "Defining resilience using probabilistic event trees," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 279-290, June.
    13. Marin, Giovanni & Modica, Marco & Paleari, Susanna & Zoboli, Roberto, 2021. "Assessing disaster risk by integrating natural and socio-economic dimensions: A decision-support tool," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    14. Linn Svegrup & Jonas Johansson & Henrik Hassel, 2019. "Integration of Critical Infrastructure and Societal Consequence Models: Impact on Swedish Power System Mitigation Decisions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1970-1996, September.
    15. Fotis Kitsios & Elpiniki Chatzidimitriou & Maria Kamariotou, 2022. "Developing a Risk Analysis Strategy Framework for Impact Assessment in Information Security Management Systems: A Case Study in IT Consulting Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Nigel W. Arnell & Emma L. Tompkins & W. Neil Adger, 2005. "Eliciting Information from Experts on the Likelihood of Rapid Climate Change," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1419-1431, December.
    17. Mariagrazia D'Angeli & Giovanni Marin & Elena Paglialunga, 2022. "Climate Change, Armed Conflicts and Resilience," Working Papers 2022.04, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    18. Walter W. Piegorsch & Susan L. Cutter & Frank Hardisty, 2007. "Benchmark Analysis for Quantifying Urban Vulnerability to Terrorist Incidents," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 1411-1425, December.
    19. Ruxandra Bejinaru, 2022. "Cluster Analysis Of Risks And Vulnerabilities For Environment Sustainable Management," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 7(2), pages 35-48, Septembri.
    20. Giovanni Marin & Marco Modica & Susanna Paleari & Roberto Zoboli, 2019. "Disaster Risk Management: Building the ‘Disaster Risk Assessment Tool’ for Italy," SEEDS Working Papers 0319, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Feb 2019.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12169-:d:671949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.