IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p11992-d668117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward Sustainable Cementitious Radioactive Waste Forms: Immobilization of Problematic Operational Wastes

Author

Listed:
  • Rehab O. Abdel Rahman

    (Hot Laboratory Center, Atomic Energy Authority of Egypt, Cairo 13759, Egypt)

  • Michael I. Ojovan

    (Department of Materials, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK
    Institute of Geology of Ore Deposits, Petrography, Mineralogy and Geochemistry of Russian Academy of Sciences (IGEM RAS), 119017 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

Developing effective radioactive waste management practices is essential for ensuring the sustainability of the nuclear industry. The immobilization of radioactive wastes is one of the main activities conducted during the management of these wastes; it aims to produce a durable waste form that has sustainable performance over long periods of time. In this work, the challenges that face the design of durable cementitious waste forms are addressed for problematic operational wastes. In this respect, the problematic characteristics of evaporator concentrates, spent ion exchangers, and organic liquid wastes are overviewed, and the factors that affect the durability of their cementitious waste forms are identified. A summary of potential conventional and innovative cementitious matrices is presented by reviewing the cementation practices in national programs and recent research devoted to developing durable matrices. Finally, a guide to optimize the mix design of these waste forms was proposed that includes the selection of the testing procedure, factors that affect the waste form performance, and the optimization technique. This guide was presented with special focus on leaching tests, which are a means to test the stabilization performance of nuclear waste forms.

Suggested Citation

  • Rehab O. Abdel Rahman & Michael I. Ojovan, 2021. "Toward Sustainable Cementitious Radioactive Waste Forms: Immobilization of Problematic Operational Wastes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11992-:d:668117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11992/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11992/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joshua M. Pearce, 2012. "Limitations of Nuclear Power as a Sustainable Energy Source," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Esther Phillip & Thye Foo Choo & Nurul Wahida Ahmad Khairuddin & Rehab O. Abdel Rahman, 2023. "On the Sustainable Utilization of Geopolymers for Safe Management of Radioactive Waste: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-30, January.
    2. Nailia Rakhimova, 2022. "Recent Advances in Alternative Cementitious Materials for Nuclear Waste Immobilization: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Marina Palamarchuk & Maxim Chervonetskiy & Natalya Polkanova & Svetlana Bratskaya, 2023. "Toward Deep Decontamination of Intermediate-Level-Activity Spent Ion-Exchange Resins Containing Poorly Soluble Inorganic Deposits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sofia Dahlgren & Jonas Ammenberg, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Public Transport, Part II—Applying a Multi-Criteria Assessment Method to Compare Different Bus Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, January.
    2. Chuanwang Sun & Nan Lyu & Xiaoling Ouyang, 2014. "Chinese Public Willingness to Pay to Avoid Having Nuclear Power Plants in the Neighborhood," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-27, October.
    3. Rigby, Aidan & Lindley, Ben & Cullen, Jonathan, 2023. "An exergy based assessment of the efficiency of nuclear fuel cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    4. Doris Klingelhöfer & Markus Braun & Gerhard M. Oremek & Dörthe Brüggmann & David A. Groneberg, 2024. "Global research on nuclear energy in the context of health and environmental risks, considering economic interests," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), January.
    5. Usubiaga, Arkaitz & Acosta-Fernández, José & McDowall, Will & Li, Francis G.N., 2017. "Exploring the macro-scale CO2 mitigation potential of photovoltaics and wind energy in Europe's energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 203-213.
    6. Chelsea Schelly & Don Lee & Elise Matz & Joshua M. Pearce, 2021. "Applying a Relationally and Socially Embedded Decision Framework to Solar Photovoltaic Adoption: A Conceptual Exploration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    7. Marius Chofor Asaba & Fabian Duffner & Florian Frieden & Jens Leker & Stephan von Delft, 2022. "Location choice for large‐scale battery manufacturing plants: Exploring the role of clean energy, costs, and knowledge on location decisions in Europe," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1514-1527, August.
    8. Seungkook Roh & Jin Won Lee & Qingchang Li, 2019. "Effects of Rank-Ordered Feature Perceptions of Energy Sources on the Choice of the Most Acceptable Power Plant for a Neighborhood: An Investigation Using a South Korean Nationwide Sample," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Alexander V. Balatsky & Galina I. Balatsky & Stanislav S. Borysov, 2015. "Resource Demand Growth and Sustainability Due to Increased World Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-11, March.
    10. Peffley, Trevor B. & Pearce, Joshua M., 2020. "The potential for grid defection of small and medium sized enterprises using solar photovoltaic, battery and generator hybrid systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 193-204.
    11. Emre İşeri & Defne Günay & Alper Almaz, 2018. "Contending narratives on the sustainability of nuclear energy in Turkey," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(1), pages 160-177, February.
    12. Ridoan Karim & Firdaus Muhammad-Sukki & Mohammad Ershadul Karim & Abu Bakar Munir & Imtiaz Mohammad Sifat & Siti Hawa Abu-Bakar & Nurul Aini Bani & Mohd Nabil Muhtazaruddin, 2018. "Legal and Regulatory Development of Nuclear Energy in Bangladesh," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Arnau González & Jordi-Roger Riba & Antoni Rius, 2015. "Optimal Sizing of a Hybrid Grid-Connected Photovoltaic–Wind–Biomass Power System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Igor Petruška & Eva Litavcová & Jana Chovancová, 2022. "Impact of Renewable Energy Sources and Nuclear Energy on CO 2 Emissions Reductions—The Case of the EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-23, December.
    15. John J. Laureto & Joshua M. Pearce, 2016. "Nuclear Insurance Subsidies Cost from Post-Fukushima Accounting Based on Media Sources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Larisa D. Petrenko & Bahodirhon Sh. Safarov, 2022. "Prospects for Nuclear Energy in the Framework of Implementation of the Sustainable Development Concept," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 5, pages 59-70, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11992-:d:668117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.