IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i19p11096-d651474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Seasonal Temperature Variation on Slurry Temperature and Biogas Composition of a Commercial Fixed-Dome Anaerobic Digester Used in Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • A. S. M. Younus Bhuiyan Sabbir

    (Department of Farm Power and Machinery, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
    Department of Farm Power and Machinery, Khulna Agricultural University, Khulna 9202, Bangladesh)

  • Chayan Kumer Saha

    (Department of Farm Power and Machinery, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh)

  • Rajesh Nandi

    (Department of Farm Power and Machinery, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Forid Uz Zaman

    (Department of Farm Power and Machinery, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Monjurul Alam

    (Department of Farm Power and Machinery, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh)

  • Shiplu Sarker

    (Department of Manufacturing and Civil Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 2815 Gjøvik, Norway)

Abstract

Biogas is produced in Bangladesh mostly through fixed-dome anaerobic digesters, which usually operate without any temperature controller. An experiment was conducted to monitor the seasonal temperature variation inside a fixed-dome type digester and its effect on biogas composition. A commercial-scale digester with a working volume of 350 m 3 was used for this study. Three k-type thermocouple sensors were used to monitor the ambient, biogas, and slurry temperatures in real-time. The results showed that the average ambient temperature in the autumn, late autumn, and winter was 29.05, 22.90, and 17.64 °C, respectively. The average slurry temperature in the autumn (30.38 °C) was higher than in the late autumn (29.36 °C) and in the winter (25.76 °C). The highest and lowest slurry temperatures were found to be 31.11 and 24.47 °C, respectively, which indicated that the digester worked within a wide temperature range, establishing both psychrophilic and mesophilic operational conditions. Higher methane concentrations were observed in the autumn than in the late autumn and winter. The CO 2 and H 2 S concentrations were higher in the winter than those of in the autumn and late autumn. The electricity generation in the winter was 47.85% and 45.15% lower than in the autumn and late autumn, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • A. S. M. Younus Bhuiyan Sabbir & Chayan Kumer Saha & Rajesh Nandi & Md. Forid Uz Zaman & Md. Monjurul Alam & Shiplu Sarker, 2021. "Effects of Seasonal Temperature Variation on Slurry Temperature and Biogas Composition of a Commercial Fixed-Dome Anaerobic Digester Used in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:11096-:d:651474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/11096/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/11096/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dong, Feiqing & Lu, Jianbo, 2013. "Using solar energy to enhance biogas production from livestock residue – A case study of the Tongren biogas engineering pig farm in South China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 759-765.
    2. Pei Guo & Jiri Zhou & Rongjiang Ma & Nanyang Yu & Yanping Yuan, 2019. "Biogas Production and Heat Transfer Performance of a Multiphase Flow Digester," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Juan M. Castano & Jay F. Martin & Richard Ciotola, 2014. "Performance of a Small-Scale, Variable Temperature Fixed Dome Digester in a Temperate Climate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Lantz, Mikael, 2012. "The economic performance of combined heat and power from biogas produced from manure in Sweden – A comparison of different CHP technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 502-511.
    5. Abhinav Choudhury & Timothy Shelford & Gary Felton & Curt Gooch & Stephanie Lansing, 2019. "Evaluation of Hydrogen Sulfide Scrubbing Systems for Anaerobic Digesters on Two U.S. Dairy Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Rajesh Nandi & Chayan Kumer Saha & Shiplu Sarker & Md. Sanaul Huda & Md. Monjurul Alam, 2020. "Optimization of Reactor Temperature for Continuous Anaerobic Digestion of Cow Manure: Bangladesh Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Gaballah, Eid S. & Abdelkader, Tarek Kh & Luo, Shuai & Yuan, Qiaoxia & El-Fatah Abomohra, Abd, 2020. "Enhancement of biogas production by integrated solar heating system: A pilot study using tubular digester," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ibrahim, Nur Atirah & Wan Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul & Mustaffa, Azizul Azri & Kidam, Kamarizan, 2022. "Risk matrix approach of extreme temperature and precipitation for renewable energy systems in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Zhou & Shini Peng & Xiaomei Huang & Chang Wu & Jing Zhang, 2017. "LNG–Air Mixture as a Supplementary Energy Injection into a Biogas Distribution Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Patrizio, P. & Leduc, S. & Chinese, D. & Kraxner, F., 2017. "Internalizing the external costs of biogas supply chains in the Italian energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 85-96.
    3. Hadi Tannous & Valentina Stojceska & Savas A. Tassou, 2023. "The Use of Solar Thermal Heating in SPIRE and Non-SPIRE Industrial Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Lauer, Markus & Hansen, Jason K. & Lamers, Patrick & Thrän, Daniela, 2018. "Making money from waste: The economic viability of producing biogas and biomethane in the Idaho dairy industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 621-636.
    5. Stephen Tangwe & Patrick Mukumba & Golden Makaka, 2022. "Comparison of the Prediction Accuracy of Total Viable Bacteria Counts in a Batch Balloon Digester Charged with Cow Manure: Multiple Linear Regression and Non-Linear Regression Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, October.
    6. El Ibrahimi, Mohammed & Khay, Ismail & El Maakoul, Anas & Bakhouya, Mohamed, 2022. "Effects of the temperature range on the energy performance of mixed and unmixed digesters with submerged waste: An experimental and CFD simulation study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1092-1104.
    7. Baena-Moreno, Francisco M. & Pastor-Pérez, Laura & Zhang, Zhien & Reina, T.R., 2020. "Stepping towards a low-carbon economy. Formic acid from biogas as case of study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    8. Herz, Gregor & Reichelt, Erik & Jahn, Matthias, 2017. "Design and evaluation of a Fischer-Tropsch process for the production of waxes from biogas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 370-381.
    9. Yasmine Ryma Ouahabi & Kenza Bensadok & Abdeldjalil Ouahabi, 2021. "Optimization of the Biomethane Production Process by Anaerobic Digestion of Wheat Straw Using Chemical Pretreatments Coupled with Ultrasonic Disintegration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    11. Stürmer, B. & Leiers, D. & Anspach, V. & Brügging, E. & Scharfy, D. & Wissel, T., 2021. "Agricultural biogas production: A regional comparison of technical parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 171-182.
    12. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.
    13. Maghanki, Maryam Mohammadi & Ghobadian, Barat & Najafi, Gholamhassan & Galogah, Reza Janzadeh, 2013. "Micro combined heat and power (MCHP) technologies and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 510-524.
    14. Di Fraia, S. & Massarotti, N. & Vanoli, L. & Costa, M., 2016. "Thermo-economic analysis of a novel cogeneration system for sewage sludge treatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P3), pages 1560-1571.
    15. Yang, Y. & Brammer, J.G. & Wright, D.G. & Scott, J.A. & Serrano, C. & Bridgwater, A.V., 2017. "Combined heat and power from the intermediate pyrolysis of biomass materials: performance, economics and environmental impact," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 639-652.
    16. Yang, Jin & Chen, Bin, 2014. "Emergy analysis of a biogas-linked agricultural system in rural China – A case study in Gongcheng Yao Autonomous County," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 173-182.
    17. Chinese, D. & Patrizio, P. & Nardin, G., 2014. "Effects of changes in Italian bioenergy promotion schemes for agricultural biogas projects: Insights from a regional optimization model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 189-205.
    18. Buta Singh & Narinder Singh & Zsolt Čonka & Michal Kolcun & Zoltán Siménfalvi & Zsolt Péter & Zoltán Szamosi, 2021. "Critical Analysis of Methods Adopted for Evaluation of Mixing Efficiency in an Anaerobic Digester," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, June.
    19. Justyna Franc-Dąbrowska & Magdalena Mądra-Sawicka & Anna Milewska, 2021. "Energy Sector Risk and Cost of Capital Assessment—Companies and Investors Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    20. Singh, A.K. & Singh, R.G. & Tiwari, G.N., 2020. "Thermal and electrical performance evaluation of photo-voltaic thermal compound parabolic concentrator integrated fixed dome biogas plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 614-624.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:11096-:d:651474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.