IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i19p10867-d647065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Could Assistive Technology Provision Models Help Pave the Way for More Environmentally Sustainable Models of Product Design, Manufacture and Service in a Post-COVID World?

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Oldfrey

    (Global Disability Innovation Hub (GDI Hub), London E15 2GW, UK
    Institute of Making, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, UK)

  • Giulia Barbareschi

    (Global Disability Innovation Hub (GDI Hub), London E15 2GW, UK
    University College London Interaction Centre (UCLIC), London WC1E 6EA, UK)

  • Priya Morjaria

    (International Centre for Eye Health, Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK)

  • Tamara Giltsoff

    (Global Disability Innovation Hub (GDI Hub), London E15 2GW, UK)

  • Jessica Massie

    (International Centre for Eye Health, Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK)

  • Mark Miodownik

    (Institute of Making, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, UK)

  • Catherine Holloway

    (Global Disability Innovation Hub (GDI Hub), London E15 2GW, UK
    University College London Interaction Centre (UCLIC), London WC1E 6EA, UK)

Abstract

From multiple studies conducted through the FCDO AT2030 Programme, as well as key literature, we examine whether Assistive Technology (AT) provision models could look towards more sustainable approaches, and by doing this benefit not only the environment, but also address the problems that the current provision systems have. We show the intrinsic links between disability inclusion and the climate crisis, and the particular vulnerability people with disabilities face in its wake. In particular, we discuss how localised circular models of production could be beneficial, facilitating context driven solutions and much needed service elements such as repair and maintenance. Key discussion areas include systems approaches, digital fabrication, repair and reuse, and material recovery. Finally, we look at what needs be done in order to enable these approaches to be implemented. In conclusion, we find that there are distinct parallels between what AT provision models require to improve equitable reliable access, and strategies that could reduce environmental impact and bring economic benefit to local communities. This could allow future AT ecosystems to be key demonstrators of circular models, however further exploration of these ideas is required to make sense of the correct next steps. What is key in all respects, moving forward, is aligning AT provision with sustainability interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Oldfrey & Giulia Barbareschi & Priya Morjaria & Tamara Giltsoff & Jessica Massie & Mark Miodownik & Catherine Holloway, 2021. "Could Assistive Technology Provision Models Help Pave the Way for More Environmentally Sustainable Models of Product Design, Manufacture and Service in a Post-COVID World?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10867-:d:647065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10867/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10867/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing-Sheng Song & Yue Zhang, 2020. "Stock or Print? Impact of 3-D Printing on Spare Parts Logistics," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(9), pages 3860-3878, September.
    2. Fritz, Martin & Koch, Max, 2014. "Potentials for prosperity without growth: Ecological sustainability, social inclusion and the quality of life in 38 countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 191-199.
    3. L'industria, 2021. "Call for Papers," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 175-189.
    4. Måns Nilsson & Dave Griggs & Martin Visbeck, 2016. "Policy: Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals," Nature, Nature, vol. 534(7607), pages 320-322, June.
    5. Marco Pesce & Ilaria Tamai & Deyan Guo & Andrea Critto & Daniele Brombal & Xiaohui Wang & Hongguang Cheng & Antonio Marcomini, 2020. "Circular Economy in China: Translating Principles into Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-31, January.
    6. Fehrer, Julia A. & Wieland, Heiko, 2021. "A systemic logic for circular business models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 609-620.
    7. Kirchherr, Julian & Reike, Denise & Hekkert, Marko, 2017. "Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 221-232.
    8. Susanna Khavul & Garry D. Bruton, 2013. "Harnessing Innovation for Change: Sustainability and Poverty in Developing Countries," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 285-306, March.
    9. L'industria, 2021. "Call for papers," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 4, pages 771-786.
    10. Nora Groce & Maria Kett & Raymond Lang & Jean-Francois Trani, 2011. "Disability and Poverty: the need for a more nuanced understanding of implications for development policy and practice," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(8), pages 1493-1513.
    11. Janaka Biyanwila, 2011. "Poverty and Disability in the Global South," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(8), pages 1537-1540.
    12. L'industria, 2021. "Call for Papers," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 2, pages 377-391.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Achraf Othman & Amnah Al Mutawaa & Amani Al Tamimi & Maha Al Mansouri, 2023. "Assessing the Readiness of Government and Semi-Government Institutions in Qatar for Inclusive and Sustainable ICT Accessibility: Introducing the MARSAD Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benedikt Berger & Martin Adam & Alexander Rühr & Alexander Benlian, 2021. "Watch Me Improve—Algorithm Aversion and Demonstrating the Ability to Learn," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(1), pages 55-68, February.
    2. Carole L. Crumley, 2021. "Historical Ecology: A Robust Bridge between Archaeology and Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Christoph Doerffel, 2021. "The Poverty Effect of Democratization: Disaggregating Democratic Institutions," Jena Economics Research Papers 2021-018, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    4. Heckelei, Thomas & Huettel, Silke & Odening, Martin & Rommel, Jens, 2021. "The replicability crisis and the p-value debate – what are the consequences for the agricultural and food economics community?," Discussion Papers 316369, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    5. Carlos Moreno-Leguizamon & Marcela Tovar-Restrepo, 2022. "Transbordering assemblages: Power, agency and autonomy (re)producing health infrastructures in the South East of England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(3), pages 624-640, February.
    6. Huang, Tseng-Lung & Liu, Ben S.C., 2021. "Augmented reality is human-like: How the humanizing experience inspires destination brand love," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    7. Kumar, Satish & Sahoo, Saumyaranjan & Lim, Weng Marc & Dana, Léo-Paul, 2022. "Religion as a social shaping force in entrepreneurship and business: Insights from a technology-empowered systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    8. Disney Leite Ramos & Shouming Chen & Ahmed Rabeeu & Abdul Basit Abdul Rahim, 2022. "Does SDG Coverage Influence Firm Performance?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-10, April.
    9. Jan Brocke & Mieke Jans & Jan Mendling & Hajo A. Reijers, 2021. "A Five-Level Framework for Research on Process Mining," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(5), pages 483-490, October.
    10. Robert Dur & Carlos Gomez-Gonzalez & Cornel Nesseler, 2022. "How to reduce discrimination? Evidence from a field experiment in amateur soccer," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 22-005/VII, Tinbergen Institute.
    11. Irene Manzini Ceinar & Ilaria Mariotti, 2021. "Teleworking In Post-Pandemic Times:May Local Coworking Spaces Be The Future Trend?," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 15(1), pages 52-76, JUNE.
    12. Gilbert Fridgen & Marc-Fabian Körner & Steffen Walters & Martin Weibelzahl, 2021. "Not All Doom and Gloom: How Energy-Intensive and Temporally Flexible Data Center Applications May Actually Promote Renewable Energy Sources," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(3), pages 243-256, June.
    13. Genevieve LeBaron, 2021. "The Role of Supply Chains in the Global Business of Forced Labour," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(2), pages 29-42, April.
    14. Sinha, Avik & Adhikari, Arnab & Jha, Ashish Kumar, 2021. "Innovational Duality and Sustainable Development: Finding Optima amidst Socio-Ecological Policy Trade-off in post-COVID-19 Era," MPRA Paper 110946, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2021.
    15. Spiekermann, Sarah & Krasnova, Hanna & Hinz, Oliver & Baumann, Annika & Benlian, Alexander & Gimpel, Henner & Heimbach, Irina & Köster, Antonia & Maedche, Alexander & Niehaves, Björn & Risius, Marten , 2022. "Values and Ethics in Information Systems – A State-of-the-Art Analysis and Avenues for Future Research," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 130842, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    16. Claudia Biancotti & Oscar Borgogno & Giovanni Veronese, 2021. "Principled data access: building public-private data partnerships for better official statistics," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 629, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    17. William Schueller & Christian Diem & Melanie Hinterplattner & Johannes Stangl & Beate Conrady & Markus Gerschberger & Stefan Thurner, 2022. "Propagation of disruptions in supply networks of essential goods: A population-centered perspective of systemic risk," Papers 2201.13325, arXiv.org.
    18. Claudio Bellia & Valeria Scavone & Marzia Ingrassia, 2021. "Food and Religion in Sicily—A New Green Tourist Destination by an Ancient Route from the Past," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    19. Kayabay, Kerem & Gökalp, Mert Onuralp & Gökalp, Ebru & Erhan Eren, P. & Koçyiğit, Altan, 2022. "Data science roadmapping: An architectural framework for facilitating transformation towards a data-driven organization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Christof Weinhardt & Christian Peukert & Oliver Hinz & Wil M. P. Aalst, 2021. "Welcome to Economies in IS!," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(4), pages 325-328, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10867-:d:647065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.