IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i18p10110-d632254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gully Erosion Susceptibility Assessment in the Kondoran Watershed Using Machine Learning Algorithms and the Boruta Feature Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Hamed Ahmadpour

    (Department of Natural Resources Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas 7916193145, Iran)

  • Ommolbanin Bazrafshan

    (Department of Natural Resources Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas 7916193145, Iran)

  • Elham Rafiei-Sardooi

    (Department of Ecological Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Jiroft, Kerman 7867161167, Iran)

  • Hossein Zamani

    (Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas 7916193145, Iran)

  • Thomas Panagopoulos

    (Research Center for Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, University of Algarve, Gambelas Campus, 8005 Faro, Portugal)

Abstract

Gully erosion susceptibility mapping is an essential land management tool to reduce soil erosion damages. This study investigates gully susceptibility based on multiple diagnostic analysis, support vector machine and random forest algorithms, and also a combination of these models, namely the ensemble model. Thus, a gully susceptibility map in the Kondoran watershed of Iran was generated by applying these models on the occurrence and non-occurrence points (as the target variable) and several predictors (slope, aspect, elevation, topographic wetness index, drainage density, plan curvature, distance to streams, lithology, soil texture and land use). The Boruta algorithm was used to select the most effective variables in modeling gully erosion susceptibility. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the receiver operating characteristics, and true skill statistics (TSS) were used to assess the model performance. The results indicated that the ensemble model had the best performance (AUC = 0.982, TSS = 0.93) compared to the others. The most effective factors in gully erosion susceptibility mapping of the study region were topological, anthropogenic, and geological. The methodology and variables of this study can be used in other regions to control and mitigate the gully erosion phenomenon by applying biophilic and regenerative techniques at the locations of the most influential factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamed Ahmadpour & Ommolbanin Bazrafshan & Elham Rafiei-Sardooi & Hossein Zamani & Thomas Panagopoulos, 2021. "Gully Erosion Susceptibility Assessment in the Kondoran Watershed Using Machine Learning Algorithms and the Boruta Feature Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10110-:d:632254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10110/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10110/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rahman, Md. Rejaur & Shi, Z.H. & Chongfa, Cai, 2009. "Soil erosion hazard evaluation—An integrated use of remote sensing, GIS and statistical approaches with biophysical parameters towards management strategies," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(13), pages 1724-1734.
    2. Kursa, Miron B. & Rudnicki, Witold R., 2010. "Feature Selection with the Boruta Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 36(i11).
    3. Massimo Conforti & Pietro Aucelli & Gaetano Robustelli & Fabio Scarciglia, 2011. "Geomorphology and GIS analysis for mapping gully erosion susceptibility in the Turbolo stream catchment (Northern Calabria, Italy)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 56(3), pages 881-898, March.
    4. Álvaro Gómez-Gutiérrez & Christian Conoscenti & Silvia Angileri & Edoardo Rotigliano & Susanne Schnabel, 2015. "Using topographical attributes to evaluate gully erosion proneness (susceptibility) in two mediterranean basins: advantages and limitations," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(1), pages 291-314, November.
    5. Vera Ferreira & André Samora-Arvela & Thomas Panagopoulos, 2016. "Soil erosion vulnerability under scenarios of climate land-use changes after the development of a large reservoir in a semi-arid area," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(7), pages 1238-1256, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kennedy Were & Syphyline Kebeney & Harrison Churu & James Mumo Mutio & Ruth Njoroge & Denis Mugaa & Boniface Alkamoi & Wilson Ng’etich & Bal Ram Singh, 2023. "Spatial Prediction and Mapping of Gully Erosion Susceptibility Using Machine Learning Techniques in a Degraded Semi-Arid Region of Kenya," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali Azedou & Said Lahssini & Abdellatif Khattabi & Modeste Meliho & Nabil Rifai, 2021. "A Methodological Comparison of Three Models for Gully Erosion Susceptibility Mapping in the Rural Municipality of El Faid (Morocco)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-30, January.
    2. Sandipta Debanshi & Swades Pal, 2020. "Assessing gully erosion susceptibility in Mayurakshi river basin of eastern India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 883-914, February.
    3. Tong, Jianfeng & Liu, Zhenxing & Zhang, Yong & Zheng, Xiujuan & Jin, Junyang, 2023. "Improved multi-gate mixture-of-experts framework for multi-step prediction of gas load," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    4. Asma Shaheen & Javed Iqbal, 2018. "Spatial Distribution and Mobility Assessment of Carcinogenic Heavy Metals in Soil Profiles Using Geostatistics and Random Forest, Boruta Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Ramón Ferri-García & María del Mar Rueda, 2022. "Variable selection in Propensity Score Adjustment to mitigate selection bias in online surveys," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(6), pages 1829-1881, December.
    6. Ghosh, Indranil & Chaudhuri, Tamal Datta & Alfaro-Cortés, Esteban & Gámez, Matías & García, Noelia, 2022. "A hybrid approach to forecasting futures prices with simultaneous consideration of optimality in ensemble feature selection and advanced artificial intelligence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    7. Jinzhao Li & Meilan Qi, 2015. "Local scour induced by upstream riverbed level lowering," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 77(3), pages 1811-1827, July.
    8. Manuel J. García Rodríguez & Vicente Rodríguez Montequín & Francisco Ortega Fernández & Joaquín M. Villanueva Balsera, 2019. "Public Procurement Announcements in Spain: Regulations, Data Analysis, and Award Price Estimator Using Machine Learning," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-20, November.
    9. Sangjin Kim & Jong-Min Kim, 2019. "Two-Stage Classification with SIS Using a New Filter Ranking Method in High Throughput Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-16, May.
    10. Arjan S. Gosal & Janine A. McMahon & Katharine M. Bowgen & Catherine H. Hoppe & Guy Ziv, 2021. "Identifying and Mapping Groups of Protected Area Visitors by Environmental Awareness," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, May.
    11. Zhao-Yue Chen & Hervé Petetin & Raúl Fernando Méndez Turrubiates & Hicham Achebak & Carlos Pérez García-Pando & Joan Ballester, 2024. "Population exposure to multiple air pollutants and its compound episodes in Europe," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Chuhong Shen & Kangning Xiong & Tian Shu, 2022. "Dynamic Evolution and Quantitative Attribution of Soil Erosion Based on Slope Units: A Case Study of a Karst Plateau-Gorge Area in SW China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Bram Janssens & Matthias Bogaert & Mathijs Maton, 2023. "Predicting the next Pogačar: a data analytical approach to detect young professional cycling talents," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(1), pages 557-588, June.
    14. Cooray, Upul & Watt, Richard G. & Tsakos, Georgios & Heilmann, Anja & Hariyama, Masanori & Yamamoto, Takafumi & Kuruppuarachchige, Isuruni & Kondo, Katsunori & Osaka, Ken & Aida, Jun, 2021. "Importance of socioeconomic factors in predicting tooth loss among older adults in Japan: Evidence from a machine learning analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    15. Simon Besnard & Nuno Carvalhais & M Altaf Arain & Andrew Black & Benjamin Brede & Nina Buchmann & Jiquan Chen & Jan G P W Clevers & Loïc P Dutrieux & Fabian Gans & Martin Herold & Martin Jung & Yoshik, 2019. "Memory effects of climate and vegetation affecting net ecosystem CO2 fluxes in global forests," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, February.
    16. Francesco Sartor & Jonathan P. Moore & Hans-Peter Kubis, 2021. "Plasma Interleukin-10 and Cholesterol Levels May Inform about Interdependences between Fitness and Fatness in Healthy Individuals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, February.
    17. Nawin Raj, 2022. "Prediction of Sea Level with Vertical Land Movement Correction Using Deep Learning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-23, November.
    18. Marta Jurchescu & Florina Grecu, 2015. "Modelling the occurrence of gullies at two spatial scales in the Olteţ Drainage Basin (Romania)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(1), pages 255-289, November.
    19. Shifa Chen & Xuan Zha, 2016. "Evaluation of soil erosion vulnerability in the Zhuxi watershed, Fujian Province, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(3), pages 1589-1607, July.
    20. Piotr Pomorski & Denise Gorse, 2023. "Improving Portfolio Performance Using a Novel Method for Predicting Financial Regimes," Papers 2310.04536, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10110-:d:632254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.