IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i18p10094-d632022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning from Each Other—A Bibliometric Review of Research on Information Disorders

Author

Listed:
  • Ramona Bran

    (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Sociology and Psychology, West University of Timisoara, Office 233, 4 Bd. Vasile Pârvan, 300223 Timișoara, Romania)

  • Laurentiu Tiru

    (Department of Sociology, Faculty of Sociology and Psychology, West University of Timisoara, Office 318, 4 Bd. Vasile Pârvan, 300223 Timișoara, Romania)

  • Gabriela Grosseck

    (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Sociology and Psychology, West University of Timisoara, Office 233, 4 Bd. Vasile Pârvan, 300223 Timișoara, Romania)

  • Carmen Holotescu

    (Department of Computer Sciences, Faculty of Computer Sciences, “Ioan Slavici” University of Timisoara, 144 Str. Păunescu Podeanu, 300569 Timișoara, Romania)

  • Laura Malita

    (Department of Communication Sciences, Faculty of Political Sciences, Philosophy and Communication Sciences, West University of Timisoara, Office 501, 4 Bd. Vasile Pârvan, 300223 Timișoara, Romania)

Abstract

Interest in research connected to information disorders has grown considerably in recent years. The phrase “information disorders” refers to three different notions: dis-, mis-, and malinformation. It is difficult to pin down this new and dynamic phenomenon of informational disruption and to assess its impact on society. Therefore, we conducted a bibliometric analysis on the complexity of information disorders using the Web of Science Core Collection database from 1975 to June 2021. We analyzed 8964 papers with the goal to have an overall picture of the topic, clarify the knowledge framework of research in this field, examine the development dynamics, identify future research directions and increase the understanding of the research on information disorders. The following are our main findings: the number of publications, authors, and journals has increased; research on information disorders has earned considerable attention in multiple academic fields; there are more and more works written in collaboration by scholars from different parts and cultures of the world. This paper makes important contributions to the literature, not only by providing researchers and practitioners with a coherent and perceptible intellectual basis to find answers, but also by bringing valuable insights for further investigation and future research directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramona Bran & Laurentiu Tiru & Gabriela Grosseck & Carmen Holotescu & Laura Malita, 2021. "Learning from Each Other—A Bibliometric Review of Research on Information Disorders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-39, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10094-:d:632022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10094/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10094/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aria, Massimo & Cuccurullo, Corrado, 2017. "bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 959-975.
    2. Frank Witlox, 2015. "Beyond the Data Smog?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 245-249, May.
    3. Hunt Allcott & Matthew Gentzkow, 2017. "Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election," NBER Working Papers 23089, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Vivek Kumar Singh & Prashasti Singh & Mousumi Karmakar & Jacqueline Leta & Philipp Mayr, 2021. "The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 5113-5142, June.
    5. Diana Tal & Avishag Gordon, 2020. "Propaganda as a research field: a bibliometric study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 741-750, January.
    6. Santiago Alonso García & Gerardo Gómez García & Mariano Sanz Prieto & Antonio José Moreno Guerrero & Carmen Rodríguez Jiménez, 2020. "The Impact of Term Fake News on the Scientific Community. Scientific Performance and Mapping in Web of Science," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Aelita Skarzauskiene & Monika Maciuliene & Ornela Ramasauskaite, . "The Digital Media in Lithuania: Combating Disinformation and Fake News," Acta Informatica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 0.
    8. Aelita Skarzauskiene & Monika Maciuliene & Ornela Ramasauskaite, 2020. "The Digital Media in Lithuania: Combating Disinformation and Fake News," Acta Informatica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(2), pages 74-91.
    9. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    10. Sten Hansson & Kati Orru & Sten Torpan & Asta Bäck & Austeja Kazemekaityte & Sunniva Frislid Meyer & Johanna Ludvigsen & Lucia Savadori & Alessandro Galvagni & Ala Pigrée, 2021. "COVID-19 information disorder: six types of harmful information during the pandemic in Europe," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3-4), pages 380-393, April.
    11. Juan Zhang & Qi Yu & Fashan Zheng & Chao Long & Zuxun Lu & Zhiguang Duan, 2016. "Comparing keywords plus of WOS and author keywords: A case study of patient adherence research," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(4), pages 967-972, April.
    12. Wang, Yuxi & McKee, Martin & Torbica, Aleksandra & Stuckler, David, 2019. "Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    13. Vladlen Koltun & David Hafner, 2021. "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, June.
    14. Hunt Allcott & Matthew Gentzkow, 2017. "Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 211-236, Spring.
    15. Matthew J Page & Joanne E McKenzie & Patrick M Bossuyt & Isabelle Boutron & Tammy C Hoffmann & Cynthia D Mulrow & Larissa Shamseer & Jennifer M Tetzlaff & Elie A Akl & Sue E Brennan & Roger Chou & Jul, 2021. "The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caputo, Andrea & Pizzi, Simone & Pellegrini, Massimiliano M. & Dabić, Marina, 2021. "Digitalization and business models: Where are we going? A science map of the field," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 489-501.
    2. Bhatnagar, S. & Sharma, D., 2022. "Evolution of green finance and its enablers: A bibliometric analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent, 2021. "What Do We Know about Co-Working Spaces? Trends and Challenges Ahead," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, January.
    4. Cano-Marin, Enrique & Mora-Cantallops, Marçal & Sanchez-Alonso, Salvador, 2023. "The power of big data analytics over fake news: A scientometric review of Twitter as a predictive system in healthcare," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    5. Huichen Gao & Shijuan Wang, 2022. "The Intellectual Structure of Research on Rural-to-Urban Migrants: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Sida Zhuang & Gabriele Bolte & Tobia Lakes, 2022. "Exploring Environmental Health Inequalities: A Scientometric Analysis of Global Research Trends (1970–2020)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-25, June.
    7. Raúl Rodríguez-Ferrándiz & Cande Sánchez-Olmos & Tatiana Hidalgo-Marí & Estela Saquete-Boro, 2021. "Memetics of Deception: Spreading Local Meme Hoaxes during COVID-19 1st Year," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Manon Berriche & Sacha Altay, 2020. "Internet users engage more with phatic posts than with health misinformation on Facebook," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, December.
    9. Santiago Alonso García & Gerardo Gómez García & Mariano Sanz Prieto & Antonio José Moreno Guerrero & Carmen Rodríguez Jiménez, 2020. "The Impact of Term Fake News on the Scientific Community. Scientific Performance and Mapping in Web of Science," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, May.
    10. Hua Zheng & Min Guo & Qian Wang & Qinghai Zhang & Noriko Akita, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Current Knowledge Structure and Research Progress Related to Urban Community Garden Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-34, January.
    11. Kun Shi & Yi Zhou & Zhen Zhang, 2021. "Mapping the Research Trends of Household Waste Recycling: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Ryan Thomson & Rebecca Mosier & Michelle Worosz, 2023. "COVID research across the social sciences in 2020: a bibliometric approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(6), pages 3377-3399, June.
    13. Xiangyu Wang & Min Zhang & Weiguo Fan & Kang Zhao, 2022. "Understanding the spread of COVID‐19 misinformation on social media: The effects of topics and a political leader's nudge," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(5), pages 726-737, May.
    14. Sharma, Gagan Deep & Verma, Mahesh & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Gupta, Mansi & Chopra, Ritika, 2022. "Transitioning green finance from theory to practice for renewable energy development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 554-565.
    15. Julia Cage & Nicolas Hervé & Marie-Luce Viaud, 2017. "The Production of Information in an Online World: Is Copy Right?," Working Papers hal-03393171, HAL.
    16. Leopoldo Fergusson & Carlos Molina, 2020. "Facebook Causes Protests," HiCN Working Papers 323, Households in Conflict Network.
    17. Tetsuro Kobayashi & Fumiaki Taka & Takahisa Suzuki, 2021. "Can “Googling” correct misbelief? Cognitive and affective consequences of online search," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-16, September.
    18. Maria Lourdes Ordoñez Olivo & Zoltán Lakner, 2023. "Shaping the Knowledge Base of Bioeconomy Sectors Development in Latin American and Caribbean Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Dean Neu & Gregory D. Saxton & Abu S. Rahaman, 2022. "Social Accountability, Ethics, and the Occupy Wall Street Protests," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 17-31, September.
    20. Robbett, Andrea & Matthews, Peter Hans, 2018. "Partisan bias and expressive voting," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 107-120.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10094-:d:632022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.