IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i12p6911-d577592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Governance Path through Digital Platforms and the Old Urban Planning Process in Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Cinzia Bellone

    (Engineering Sciencies Department, Guglielmo Marconi University, 00193 Rome, Italy)

  • Fabio Naselli

    (Department of Architecture, Epoka University, 1032 Tirana, Albania)

  • Fabio Andreassi

    (Engineering Sciencies Department, Guglielmo Marconi University, 00193 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Current acceleration in digital practices, unexpected challenges in our social and spatial interactions, and sudden limitations in our physical spaces, mark unpredictable changes in our old normal. A different normal—as generated nowadays from the global pandemic 2020—is setting out, indeed, a mixed physical/virtual framework of the modification humanity is undertaking in being pushed into a new “digital age”; or better, as many scholars are saying, into the New Normal. A new normal in which the balance between physical and virtual interactions became in vantage of the second one in just one year, by increasing, at the same time, both the quantity and the quality of exchanging digital data. It is drafted a bi-dimensional enlarging that re-calls and stresses moreover the value of certain qualitative multi-data-based analyses aimed in reading the people’s common-sense to extrapolate wishes and needs within their daily lives; as the sentiment analysis applied to the urban planning processes wants to do. In synthesis, the bigger number of qualitative data coming from the web (from Socials mainly) became more affordable and more reliable (due to the new larger number of digital flows) in shaping new ways for a more effective public participation within the conventional planning process. In the pages of this article authors, through different but shared viewpoints, propose a possible answer to the topic of a new “Governance 3.0” addressing the attempt of a change of those consolidated paradigms within which the spatial dimension—in which we live and we act day by day—is shaped through planning processes consolidate over the years. Analyzing the relationship between Technocracy and Democracy, as defined by Khanna, it is argued that it is possible to realize new forecasts and to acquire a more democratic and participatory (inclusive) dimension of Governance, thanks to new digital technologies by exploring the general unconscious “feeling” of people, through anonymous data collection from Socials and similar platforms and without any direct or indirect interference with it. The Sentiment Analysis can “define automatic tools able to extract subjective information from texts in natural languages, such as opinions and sentiments, in order to create structured and actionable knowledge to be used by either a decision-support system or a decision-maker.

Suggested Citation

  • Cinzia Bellone & Fabio Naselli & Fabio Andreassi, 2021. "New Governance Path through Digital Platforms and the Old Urban Planning Process in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6911-:d:577592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6911/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6911/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel J. Hopkins & Gary King, 2010. "A Method of Automated Nonparametric Content Analysis for Social Science," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 229-247, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabio Naselli & Cinzia Barbara Bellone & Mirjana Pali & Fabio Andreassi, 2022. "Tirana as an Open Lab: A Pilot for an Integrated Research Tourism Vision Pre-/Post-Pandemic," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sinziana-Maria Rindasu & Ioan Dan Topor & Liliana Ionescu-Feleaga, 2023. "The Evolution of Management Accountants' Digital Skills in Industry 4.0: A Qualitative Approach," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 1, pages 38-48, March.
    2. Mujtaba Ali Isani, 2021. "Methodological Problems of Using Arabic-Language Twitter as a Gauge for Arab Attitudes Toward Politics and Society," Contemporary Review of the Middle East, , vol. 8(1), pages 22-35, March.
    3. Pauwels, Koen & Aksehirli, Zeynep & Lackman, Andrew, 2016. "Like the ad or the brand? Marketing stimulates different electronic word-of-mouth content to drive online and offline performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 639-655.
    4. Rauh, Christian, 2018. "Validating a sentiment dictionary for German political language—a workbench note," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 15(4), pages 319-343.
    5. Andrea Sciandra & Alessio Surian & Livio Finos, 2021. "Supervised Machine Learning Methods to Disclose Action and Information in “U.N. 2030 Agenda” Social Media Data," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 689-699, August.
    6. Christopher D. Wirz & Michael A. Xenos & Dominique Brossard & Dietram Scheufele & Jennifer H. Chung & Luisa Massarani, 2018. "Rethinking Social Amplification of Risk: Social Media and Zika in Three Languages," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(12), pages 2599-2624, December.
    7. Angela Chang & Peter J. Schulz & Angus Wenghin Cheong, 2020. "Online Newspaper Framing of Non-Communicable Diseases: Comparison of Mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-15, August.
    8. Francesca Greco & Alessandro Polli, 2019. "Vaccines in Italy: the emotional text mining of social media," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 73(1), pages 89-99, January-M.
    9. Lehotský, Lukáš & Černoch, Filip & Osička, Jan & Ocelík, Petr, 2019. "When climate change is missing: Media discourse on coal mining in the Czech Republic," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 774-786.
    10. France, Stephen L. & Davcik, Nebojsa S. & Kazandjian, Brett J., 2025. "Digital brand equity: The concept, antecedents, measurement, and future development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    11. Pilar Rey del Castillo, 2022. "Building Daily Economic Sentiment Indicators," CESifo Working Paper Series 10087, CESifo.
    12. Carmelo León & Jorge Araña & Javier León, 2013. "Correcting for Scale Perception Bias in Measuring Corruption: an Application to Chile and Spain," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 977-995, December.
    13. Weifeng Zhong, 2016. "The candidates in their own words: A textual analysis of 2016 president primary debates," AEI Economic Perspectives, American Enterprise Institute, April.
    14. Alexander Herzog & Slava Mikhaylov, 2010. "Estimating Government Discretion in Fiscal Policy Making," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp339, IIIS, revised Jul 2010.
    15. Camille Tremblay-Antoine & Steve Jacob & Yannick Dufresne & Patrick Poncet & Shannon Dinan, 2024. "An open window into politics: A structured database of plenary sessions of the European Parliament," European Union Politics, , vol. 25(3), pages 605-622, September.
    16. Laura K. Nelson & Derek Burk & Marcel Knudsen & Leslie McCall, 2021. "The Future of Coding: A Comparison of Hand-Coding and Three Types of Computer-Assisted Text Analysis Methods," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 50(1), pages 202-237, February.
    17. Lundberg, Ian & Brand, Jennie E. & Jeon, Nanum, 2022. "Researcher reasoning meets computational capacity: Machine learning for social science," SocArXiv s5zc8, Center for Open Science.
    18. Jae Yeon Kim, 2021. "Integrating human and machine coding to measure political issues in ethnic newspaper articles," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 585-612, November.
    19. Andrea Ceron & Luigi Curini & Stefano M. Iacus, 2019. "ISIS at Its Apogee: The Arabic Discourse on Twitter and What We Can Learn From That About ISIS Support and Foreign Fighters," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440187, March.
    20. Alexander Herzog & Slava Mikhaylov, 2010. "A new Database of Parliamentary Debates in Ireland, 1922--2008," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp338, IIIS, revised Jul 2010.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6911-:d:577592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.