IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p5859-d560533.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Extenics-Based Scheduled Configuration Methodology for Low-Carbon Product Design in Consideration of Contradictory Problem Solving

Author

Listed:
  • Shedong Ren

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China
    College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Fangzhi Gui

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Yanwei Zhao

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Min Zhan

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Wanliang Wang

    (College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Jianqiang Zhou

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Quzhou University, Quzhou 324000, China)

Abstract

Low-carbon product design involves a redesign process that requires not only structural module modification, but more importantly, generating innovative principles to solve design contradictions. Such contradictions include when current design conditions cannot satisfy design requirements or there are antithetical design goals. On the other hand, configuration tasks in the reconfiguration process are interdependent, which requires a well-scheduled arrangement to reduce feedback information. This study proposes an effective configuration methodology for low-carbon design. Firstly, configuration tasks and configuration parameters are designated through quality characteristics, and the directed network along with the associated values of configuration tasks are transformed into the design structure matrix to construct the information flow diagram. Then, the Extenics-based problem-solving model is presented to address design contradictions: low-carbon incompatibility and antithetical problems are clarified and formulated with a basic-element model; extensible and conjugate analysis tools are used to identify problematic structures and provide feasible measures; the Gantt chart of measures execution based on the information flow diagram is constructed to reduce feedback and generate robust schemes with strategy models. The methodology is applied to the vacuum pump low-carbon design, the results show that it effectively solves contradictions with innovative design schemes, and comparative analysis verifies the performance of Extenics.

Suggested Citation

  • Shedong Ren & Fangzhi Gui & Yanwei Zhao & Min Zhan & Wanliang Wang & Jianqiang Zhou, 2021. "An Extenics-Based Scheduled Configuration Methodology for Low-Carbon Product Design in Consideration of Contradictory Problem Solving," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-41, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5859-:d:560533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5859/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5859/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Imran Qureshi & Rajah A/l Rasiah & Basheer M. Al-Ghazali & Maqsood Haider & Hanifah Jambari & Iswan & Sasmoko, 2019. "Modeling Work Practices under Socio-Technical Systems for Sustainable Manufacturing Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Fabio Neves Puglieri & Aldo Roberto Ometto & Rodrigo Salvador & Murillo Vetroni Barros & Cassiano Moro Piekarski & Izabella Morré Rodrigues & Octavio Diegoli Netto, 2020. "An Environmental and Operational Analysis of Quality Function Deployment-Based Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Luoke Hu & Renzhong Tang & Keyan He & Shun Jia, 2015. "Estimating machining-related energy consumption of parts at the design phase based on feature technology," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(23), pages 7016-7033, December.
    4. Daniela C. A. Pigosso & Mariana Ferraz & Cláudia Echevenguá Teixeira & Henrique Rozenfeld, 2016. "The Deployment of Product-Related Environmental Legislation into Product Requirements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Luoke & Peng, Chen & Evans, Steve & Peng, Tao & Liu, Ying & Tang, Renzhong & Tiwari, Ashutosh, 2017. "Minimising the machining energy consumption of a machine tool by sequencing the features of a part," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 292-305.
    2. Isabel García Gutiérrez & Daniel Elduque & Carmelo Pina & Rafael Tobajas & Carlos Javierre, 2020. "Influence of the Composition on the Environmental Impact of a Casting Magnesium Alloy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Stefano Poponi & Andrea Colantoni & Sirio R.S. Cividino & Enrico Maria Mosconi, 2019. "The Stakeholders’ Perspective within the B Corp Certification for a Circular Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Vinícius P. Rodrigues & Daniela C. A. Pigosso & Jakob W. Andersen & Tim C. McAloone, 2018. "Evaluating the Potential Business Benefits of Ecodesign Implementation: A Logic Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-26, June.
    5. K. E. K. Vimal & Jayakrishna Kandasamy & Angel Acevedo Duque, 2021. "Integrating sustainability and remanufacturing strategies by remanufacturing quality function deployment (RQFD)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 14090-14122, September.
    6. Cai, Wei & Wang, Lianguo & Li, Li & Xie, Jun & Jia, Shun & Zhang, Xugang & Jiang, Zhigang & Lai, Kee-hung, 2022. "A review on methods of energy performance improvement towards sustainable manufacturing from perspectives of energy monitoring, evaluation, optimization and benchmarking," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    7. Seungyeon Moon & Heesang Lee, 2021. "Shaping a Circular Economy in the Digital TV Industry: Focusing on Ecopreneurship through the Lens of Dynamic Capability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-41, April.
    8. Zhang, Jiaqi & Han, Xin & Li, Li & Jia, Shun & Jiang, Zhigang & Duan, Xiangmin & Lai, Kee-hung & Cai, Wei, 2023. "Multi-objective optimisation for energy saving and high efficiency production oriented multidirectional turning based on improved fireworks algorithm considering energy, efficiency and quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    9. Chiuhsiang Joe Lin & Tariku Tamiru Belis & Tsai Chi Kuo, 2019. "Ergonomics-Based Factors or Criteria for the Evaluation of Sustainable Product Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Salaheldin Hamad & Muhammad Umar Draz & Fong-Woon Lai, 2020. "The Impact of Corporate Governance and Sustainability Reporting on Integrated Reporting: A Conceptual Framework," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, June.
    11. Muhammad Imran Qureshi & Nohman Khan & Shazia Qayyum & Subha Malik & Sanil S Hishan & Thurasamy Ramayah, 2020. "Classifications of Sustainable Manufacturing Practices in ASEAN Region: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Past Decade of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Cai, Wei & Lai, Kee-hung, 2021. "Sustainability assessment of mechanical manufacturing systems in the industrial sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    13. Dotun Adebanjo & Pei-Lee Teh & Pervaiz K Ahmed & Erhan Atay & Peter Ractham, 2020. "Competitive Priorities, Employee Management and Development and Sustainable Manufacturing Performance in Asian Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-22, July.
    14. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana & Andrzej Gazda, 2023. "A New QFD-CE Method for Considering the Concept of Sustainable Development and Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, March.
    15. Javier Maldonado-Romo & Mario Aldape-Pérez, 2021. "Sustainable Circular Micro Index for Evaluating Virtual Substitution Using Machine Learning with the Path Planning Problem as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Guo, Yansong & Duflou, Joost R. & Deng, Yelin & Lauwers, Bert, 2018. "A life cycle energy analysis integrated process planning approach to foster the sustainability of discrete part manufacturing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 604-617.
    17. Ani Bicaku & Markus Tauber & Jerker Delsing, 2020. "Security standard compliance and continuous verification for Industrial Internet of Things," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 16(6), pages 15501477209, June.
    18. Louise Lindkvist Haziri & Erik Sundin & Tomohiko Sakao, 2019. "Feedback from Remanufacturing: Its Unexploited Potential to Improve Future Product Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-24, July.
    19. Hu, Luoke & Liu, Ying & Peng, Chen & Tang, Wangchujun & Tang, Renzhong & Tiwari, Ashutosh, 2018. "Minimising the energy consumption of tool change and tool path of machining by sequencing the features," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 390-402.
    20. Tygran Dzhuguryan & Agnieszka Deja & Bogusz Wiśnicki & Zofia Jóźwiak, 2020. "The Design of Sustainable City Multi-Floor Manufacturing Processes Under Uncertainty in Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5859-:d:560533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.