IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i9p3693-d353563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regenerating Communities. New Life for a Local Railway: A Technological and Environmental Study

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Vittoria Corazza

    (Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy)

  • Sandro Imbastaro

    (Department of Cargo Operations, TUA—Società Unica Abruzzese di Trasporto S.p.A, 66034 Lanciano, Italy)

  • Marco Pascucci

    (Pascucci Consulting, 00196 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Revamping abandoned railways is often associated with leisure functions and non-routine trips. When areas evolve from rural settlements to conurbations with mixed land use and high travel demand, the reuse of no-longer-operational rail services can prove to be appropriate to meet such new requirements. This is the case of an abandoned railway in central Italy, the Sangritana Line, whose rehabilitation could serve a former rural area, now under continuous development. The paper outlines operational features of the new service, starting from the available Sangritana infrastructure, in order to highlight the drivers and barriers associated with the reopening of operations. The goal is to provide scientific corroboration for similar feasibility studies and stress the relevance of rehabilitating railways in urban regeneration processes according to a vision called the Multiple Rs, which associates the new rail supply with the possibility of requalifying several components of the urban environment. To this end, along with the initial description of the status quo and the local constraints, the paper elaborates the methodology adopted for this feasibility study, the main operational findings, with a focus on the potential environmental benefits, and the implications according to the Multiple Rs approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Vittoria Corazza & Sandro Imbastaro & Marco Pascucci, 2020. "Regenerating Communities. New Life for a Local Railway: A Technological and Environmental Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-24, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3693-:d:353563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3693/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3693/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miroslaw Smieszek & Magdalena Dobrzanska & Pawel Dobrzanski, 2019. "Rzeszow as a City Taking Steps Towards Developing Sustainable Public Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Maria Vittoria Corazza & Nicola Favaretto, 2019. "A Methodology to Evaluate Accessibility to Bus Stops as a Contribution to Improve Sustainability in Urban Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Cubukcu, K. Mert, 2008. "Examining the cost structure of urban bus transit industry: does urban geography help?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 278-291.
    4. Kay, Andrew I. & Noland, Robert B. & DiPetrillo, Stephanie, 2014. "Residential property valuations near transit stations with transit-oriented development," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 131-140.
    5. Mattias Qviström & Jens Bengtsson, 2015. "What Kind of Transit-Oriented Development? Using Planning History to Differentiate a Model for Sustainable Development," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(12), pages 2516-2534, December.
    6. Gonzalo Fernandez-Sanchez & Alvaro Fernandez-Heredia, 2018. "Strategic Thinking for Sustainability: A Review of 10 Strategies for Sustainable Mobility by Bus for Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Piotr Kaszczyszyn & Natalia Sypion-Dutkowska, 2019. "Walking Access to Public Transportation Stops for City Residents. A Comparison of Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Hong, Andy & Boarnet, Marlon G. & Houston, Douglas, 2016. "New light rail transit and active travel: A longitudinal study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 131-144.
    9. Cristina López & Rocío Ruíz-Benítez & Carmen Vargas-Machuca, 2019. "On the Environmental and Social Sustainability of Technological Innovations in Urban Bus Transport: The EU Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Laura Moretti & Giuseppe Loprencipe, 2018. "Climate Change and Transport Infrastructures: State of the Art," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yongliang Deng & Haolun Guo & Miaomiao Meng & Ying Zhang & Shuangshuang Pei, 2020. "Exploring the Effects of Safety Climate on Worker’s Safety Behavior in Subway Operation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renata Żochowska & Marcin Jacek Kłos & Piotr Soczówka & Marcin Pilch, 2022. "Assessment of Accessibility of Public Transport by Using Temporal and Spatial Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-29, December.
    2. Ibraeva, Anna & Correia, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida & Silva, Cecília & Antunes, António Pais, 2020. "Transit-oriented development: A review of research achievements and challenges," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 110-130.
    3. Clara Moreira Senne & Josiane Palma Lima & Fábio Favaretto, 2021. "An Index for the Sustainability of Integrated Urban Transport and Logistics: The Case Study of São Paulo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Say-Wah Lee & Chuen-Wah Seow & Ke Xue, 2021. "Residents’ Sustainable City Evaluation, Satisfaction and Loyalty: Integrating Importance-Performance Analysis and Structural Equation Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Letizia Appolloni & Alberto Giretti & Maria Vittoria Corazza & Daniela D’Alessandro, 2020. "Walkable Urban Environments: An Ergonomic Approach of Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-31, October.
    6. Letizia Appolloni & Maria Vittoria Corazza & Daniela D’Alessandro, 2019. "The Pleasure of Walking: An Innovative Methodology to Assess Appropriate Walkable Performance in Urban Areas to Support Transport Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-26, June.
    7. Gabriella Vitorino Guimarães & Tálita Floriano Santos & Vicente Aprigliano Fernandes & Jorge Eliécer Córdoba Maquilón & Marcelino Aurélio Vieira da Silva, 2020. "Assessment for the Social Sustainability and Equity under the Perspective of Accessibility to Jobs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Qing Shen & Simin Xu & Jiang Lin, 2018. "Effects of bus transit-oriented development (BTOD) on single-family property value in Seattle metropolitan area," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(13), pages 2960-2979, October.
    9. Marcin Janusz & Marcin Kowalczyk, 2022. "How Smart Are V4 Cities? Evidence from the Multidimensional Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Turbay, André L. B. & Pereira, Rafael H. M. & Firmino, Rodrigo, 2022. "The equity implications of TOD in Curitiba," SocArXiv cj87q, Center for Open Science.
    11. Mariano Gallo & Mario Marinelli, 2020. "Sustainable Mobility: A Review of Possible Actions and Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-39, September.
    12. Moran, Marcel E, 2022. "Are shelters in place? Mapping the distribution of transit amenities via a bus-stop census of San Francisco," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt3gj1t495, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    13. Piotr Kaszczyszyn & Natalia Sypion-Dutkowska, 2019. "Walking Access to Public Transportation Stops for City Residents. A Comparison of Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-13, July.
    14. Azad, Mojdeh & Abdelqader, Dua & Taboada, Luis M. & Cherry, Christopher R., 2021. "Walk-to-transit demand estimation methods applied at the parcel level to improve pedestrian infrastructure investment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    15. Michał Urbaniak & Ewa Kardas-Cinal, 2021. "Optimization of Train Energy Cooperation Using Scheduled Service Time Reserve," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Zhu, Dianchen & Sze, N.N. & Feng, Zhongxiang & Chan, Ho-Yin, 2023. "Waiting for signalized crossing or walking to footbridge/underpass? Examining the effect of weather using stated choice experiment with panel mixed random regret minimization approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 144-169.
    17. Jarmo Uusikartano & Hannele Väyrynen & Leena Aarikka-Stenroos, 2020. "Public Agency in Changing Industrial Circular Economy Ecosystems: Roles, Modes and Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, November.
    18. Peng, Ya-Ting & Li, Zhi-Chun & Choi, Keechoo, 2017. "Transit-oriented development in an urban rail transportation corridor," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 269-290.
    19. Koen van Ruijven & Paul Verstraten & Peter Zwaneveld, 2019. "Transit-oriented developments and residential property values," CPB Discussion Paper 399, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    20. Mateusz Szarata & Piotr Olszewski & Lesław Bichajło, 2021. "Simulation Study of Dynamic Bus Lane Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3693-:d:353563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.