IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i8p3219-d346190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Emission Calculation Method and Low-Carbon Technology for Use in Expressway Construction

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Peng

    (School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Xiaoying Tong

    (School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
    Shaanxi Institute of Urban & Rural Planning and Design, Xi’an 710021, China)

  • Shijiang Cao

    (China National Construction Group Guiyang Survey Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550081, China)

  • Wenying Li

    (Xi’an Highway Research Institute, Xi’an 710065, China)

  • Gui Xu

    (School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

Abstract

There is a need for a quantitative calculation method for carbon emissions during asphalt pavement construction. In this study, the carbon sources were detected and carbon emission during pavement construction was divided into two parts—the emission resulting from energy consumption and that arising from the volatilization of asphalt mixtures itself. The carbon emission calculation model of energy consumption is presented based on the energy consumption list and calorific value method proposed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The model of the carbon emission from volatilization of asphalt mixtures was introduced based on a combination of on-site inspection data and the greenhouse gas diffusion rate and calculated volume. Finally, high-carbon emission processes and total carbon emissions were obtained, and the corresponding low-carbon technologies were proposed for different types of carbon emissions. The results show that the ratio of carbon emission generated by energy consumption and the volatilization of asphalt mixtures is 3:2; aggregate and asphalt heating are high-carbon emission processes of energy consumption, while asphalt mixture rolling and mixing are the high-carbon emission processes of asphalt mixture. Furthermore, the use of natural gas can control carbon emission in energy consumption; low-carbon asphalt mixtures and warm mixing technology can effectively reduce carbon emission from the volatilization of asphalt mixtures. This study lays a theoretical foundation for green pavement construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Peng & Xiaoying Tong & Shijiang Cao & Wenying Li & Gui Xu, 2020. "Carbon Emission Calculation Method and Low-Carbon Technology for Use in Expressway Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3219-:d:346190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3219/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3219/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thives, Liseane Padilha & Ghisi, Enedir, 2017. "Asphalt mixtures emission and energy consumption: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 473-484.
    2. Suyi Kim, 2019. "Decomposition Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Korea’s Transportation Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Bin Ouyang & Yi Zhang & Zhongkui Li & Jie Guo, 2015. "Methodology of Urban Transport Carbon Emission Calculation Applicable for China: Guangzhou as a Case Study," Springer Books, in: Zhenji Zhang & Zuojun Max Shen & Juliang Zhang & Runtong Zhang (ed.), Liss 2014, edition 127, pages 447-456, Springer.
    4. Filippo G. Praticò & Marinella Giunta & Marina Mistretta & Teresa Maria Gulotta, 2020. "Energy and Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Sustainable Pavement Materials and Technologies for Urban Roads," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Matthias Jonas & Rostyslav Bun & Zbigniew Nahorski & Gregg Marland & Mykola Gusti & Olha Danylo, 2019. "Quantifying greenhouse gas emissions," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 839-852, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Irantzu Álvarez & Paulo Etxeberria & Elisabete Alberdi & Heriberto Pérez-Acebo & Isabel Eguia & María José García, 2021. "Sustainable Civil Engineering: Incorporating Sustainable Development Goals in Higher Education Curricula," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Tomas Macak & Jan Hron & Jaromir Stusek, 2020. "A Causal Model of the Sustainable Use of Resources: A Case Study on a Woodworking Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Chunguang Sheng & Guangyu Wang & Yude Geng & Lirong Chen, 2020. "The Correlation Analysis of Futures Pricing Mechanism in China’s Carbon Financial Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javier Espinoza & Cristian Medina & Alejandra Calabi-Floody & Elsa Sánchez-Alonso & Gonzalo Valdés & Andrés Quiroz, 2020. "Evaluation of Reductions in Fume Emissions (VOCs and SVOCs) from Warm Mix Asphalt Incorporating Natural Zeolite and Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement for Sustainable Pavements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Mulian Zheng & Wang Chen & Xiaoyan Ding & Wenwu Zhang & Sixin Yu, 2021. "Comprehensive Life Cycle Environmental Assessment of Preventive Maintenance Techniques for Asphalt Pavement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Karlsson, Ida & Rootzén, Johan & Johnsson, Filip, 2020. "Reaching net-zero carbon emissions in construction supply chains – Analysis of a Swedish road construction project," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Giusi Perri & Manuel De Rose & Josipa Domitrović & Rosolino Vaiana, 2023. "CO 2 Impact Analysis for Road Embankment Construction: Comparison of Lignin and Lime Soil Stabilization Treatments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Yunpeng Zhao & Dimitrios Goulias & Luca Tefa & Marco Bassani, 2021. "Life Cycle Economic and Environmental Impacts of CDW Recycled Aggregates in Roadway Construction and Rehabilitation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Zhu, Lichao, 2023. "Comparative evaluation of CO2 emissions from transportation in countries around the world," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Ming Meng & Manyu Li, 2020. "Decomposition Analysis and Trend Prediction of CO 2 Emissions in China’s Transportation Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Herz, Gregor & Rix, Christopher & Jacobasch, Eric & Müller, Nils & Reichelt, Erik & Jahn, Matthias & Michaelis, Alexander, 2021. "Economic assessment of Power-to-Liquid processes – Influence of electrolysis technology and operating conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    9. Jayne F. Knott & Jennifer M. Jacobs & Jo E. Sias & Paul Kirshen & Eshan V. Dave, 2019. "A Framework for Introducing Climate-Change Adaptation in Pavement Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-23, August.
    10. Dong, Kangyin & Hochman, Gal & Timilsina, Govinda R., 2020. "Do drivers of CO2 emission growth alter overtime and by the stage of economic development?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    11. Mathieu Fortin, 2021. "Comparison of uncertainty quantification techniques for national greenhouse gas inventories," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 1-20, February.
    12. Elisabete Nogueira & Sofia Gomes & João M. Lopes, 2023. "Triple Bottom Line, Sustainability, and Economic Development: What Binds Them Together? A Bibliometric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.
    13. F. C. G. Martinho & L. G. Picado-Santos & S. D. Capitão, 2018. "Feasibility Assessment of the Use of Recycled Aggregates for Asphalt Mixtures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, May.
    14. Paolo Intini & Nicola Berloco & Pasquale Colonna & Vittorio Ranieri, 2020. "The Impact of Heavy Vehicle Traffic Trends on the Overdesign of Flexible Asphalt Pavements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, March.
    15. Abdalrhman Milad & Ali Mohammed Babalghaith & Abdulnaser M. Al-Sabaeei & Anmar Dulaimi & Abdualmtalab Ali & Sajjala Sreedhar Reddy & Munder Bilema & Nur Izzi Md Yusoff, 2022. "A Comparative Review of Hot and Warm Mix Asphalt Technologies from Environmental and Economic Perspectives: Towards a Sustainable Asphalt Pavement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-23, November.
    16. Gao, Kangping & Xu, Xinxin & Jiao, Shengjie, 2022. "Prediction and visualization analysis of drilling energy consumption based on mechanism and data hybrid drive," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    17. Anda Ligia Belc & Adrian Ciutina & Raluca Buzatu & Florin Belc & Ciprian Costescu, 2021. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Different Warm Mix Asphalts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    18. Diana Eliza Godoi Bizarro & Zoran Steinmann & Isabel Nieuwenhuijse & Elisabeth Keijzer & Mara Hauck, 2021. "Potential Carbon Footprint Reduction for Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Innovations: LCA Methodology, Best Available Technology, and Near-Future Reduction Potential," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, January.
    19. Ida Karlsson & Johan Rootzén & Alla Toktarova & Mikael Odenberger & Filip Johnsson & Lisa Göransson, 2020. "Roadmap for Decarbonization of the Building and Construction Industry—A Supply Chain Analysis Including Primary Production of Steel and Cement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-40, August.
    20. Moins, B. & France, C. & Van den bergh, W. & Audenaert, A., 2020. "Implementing life cycle cost analysis in road engineering: A critical review on methodological framework choices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3219-:d:346190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.