IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i7p2824-d340545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust Proof of Stake: A New Consensus Protocol for Sustainable Blockchain Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Aiya Li

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)

  • Xianhua Wei

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)

  • Zhou He

    (School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
    Key Laboratory of Big Data Mining and Knowledge Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)

Abstract

In the digital economy era, the development of a distributed robust economy system has become increasingly important. The blockchain technology can be used to build such a system, but current mainstream consensus protocols are vulnerable to attack, making blockchain systems unsustainable. In this paper, we propose a new Robust Proof of Stake (RPoS) consensus protocol, which uses the amount of coins to select miners and limits the maximum value of the coin age to effectively avoid coin age accumulation attack and Nothing-at-Stake (N@S) attack. Under a comparison framework, we show that the RPoS equals or outperforms Proof of Work (PoW) protocol and Proof of Stake (PoS) protocol in three dimensions: energy consumption, robustness, and transaction processing speed. To compare the three consensus protocols in terms of trade efficiency, we built an agent-based model and find that RPoS protocol has greater or similar trade request-satisfied ratio than PoW and PoS. Hence, we suggest that RPoS is very suitable for building a robust digital economy distributed system.

Suggested Citation

  • Aiya Li & Xianhua Wei & Zhou He, 2020. "Robust Proof of Stake: A New Consensus Protocol for Sustainable Blockchain Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2824-:d:340545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2824/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2824/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Florentina Magda Enescu & Nicu Bizon & Adrian Onu & Maria Simona Răboacă & Phatiphat Thounthong & Alin Gheorghita Mazare & Gheorghe Șerban, 2020. "Implementing Blockchain Technology in Irrigation Systems That Integrate Photovoltaic Energy Generation Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-30, February.
    2. Shuchih Ernest Chang & Hueimin Louis Luo & YiChian Chen, 2019. "Blockchain-Enabled Trade Finance Innovation: A Potential Paradigm Shift on Using Letter of Credit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Jun-Ho Huh & Seong-Kyu Kim, 2019. "The Blockchain Consensus Algorithm for Viable Management of New and Renewable Energies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, June.
    4. Zhang, Hengjie & Dong, Yucheng & Chiclana, Francisco & Yu, Shui, 2019. "Consensus efficiency in group decision making: A comprehensive comparative study and its optimal design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 580-598.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agur, Itai & Lavayssière, Xavier & Villegas Bauer, Germán & Deodoro, Jose & Martinez Peria, Soledad & Sandri, Damiano & Tourpe, Hervé, 2023. "Lessons from crypto assets for the design of energy efficient digital currencies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    2. Hongbin Hu & Yongbin Wang, 2022. "Research on Convergence Media Consensus Mechanism Based on Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-27, September.
    3. Ying Zhang & Wenwen Luo & Feifei Yu, 2020. "Construction of Chinese Smart Water Conservancy Platform Based on the Blockchain: Technology Integration and Innovation Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Furqan Jameel & Uzair Javaid & Wali Ullah Khan & Muhammad Naveed Aman & Haris Pervaiz & Riku Jäntti, 2020. "Reinforcement Learning in Blockchain-Enabled IIoT Networks: A Survey of Recent Advances and Open Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Carlo Gola & Johannes Sedlmeir, 2022. "Addressing the Sustainability of Distributed Ledger Technology," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 670, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    6. Vincenzo Varriale & Antonello Cammarano & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2020. "The Unknown Potential of Blockchain for Sustainable Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Valerio Mandarino & Giuseppe Pappalardo & Emiliano Tramontana, 2023. "Proof of Flow: A Design Pattern for the Green Energy Market," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, September.
    8. Patrici Calvo, 2024. "Cryptoart: ethical challenges of the NFT revolution," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Albérico Travassos Rosário & Joana Carmo Dias, 2023. "The New Digital Economy and Sustainability: Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Waseem & Muhammad Adnan Khan & Arman Goudarzi & Shah Fahad & Intisar Ali Sajjad & Pierluigi Siano, 2023. "Incorporation of Blockchain Technology for Different Smart Grid Applications: Architecture, Prospects, and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Yan Liu & Chao Shang, 2022. "Application of Blockchain Technology in Agricultural Water Rights Trade Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-10, June.
    3. Eduardo Fernández & Claudia Gómez-Santillán & Nelson Rangel-Valdez & Laura Cruz-Reyes, 2022. "Group Multi-Objective Optimization Under Imprecision and Uncertainty Using a Novel Interval Outranking Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 945-994, October.
    4. Michael Paul Kramer & Linda Bitsch & Jon Hanf, 2021. "Blockchain and Its Impacts on Agri-Food Supply Chain Network Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Sha Fan & Hengjie Zhang & Huali Tang, 2019. "A Linguistic Hierarchy Model with Self-Confidence Preference Relations and Its Application in Co-Regulation of Food Safety in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Hamzah Khan & Tariq Masood, 2022. "Impact of Blockchain Technology on Smart Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-27, September.
    7. Heongu Lee & Changhak Yeon, 2021. "Blockchain-Based Traceability for Anti-Counterfeit in Cross-Border E-Commerce Transactions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Labella, Álvaro & Liu, Hongbin & Rodríguez, Rosa M. & Martínez, Luis, 2020. "A Cost Consensus Metric for Consensus Reaching Processes based on a comprehensive minimum cost model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(2), pages 316-331.
    9. Xiangrui Chao & Yucheng Dong & Gang Kou & Yi Peng, 2022. "How to determine the consensus threshold in group decision making: a method based on efficiency benchmark using benefit and cost insight," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 143-177, September.
    10. Daeheon Choi & Chune Young Chung & Thou Seyha & Jason Young, 2020. "Factors Affecting Organizations’ Resistance to the Adoption of Blockchain Technology in Supply Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-37, October.
    11. Wu, Siqi & Wu, Meng & Dong, Yucheng & Liang, Haiming & Zhao, Sihai, 2020. "The 2-rank additive model with axiomatic design in multiple attribute decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 536-545.
    12. Zhen Zhang & Zhuolin Li, 2023. "Consensus-based TOPSIS-Sort-B for multi-criteria sorting in the context of group decision-making," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 911-938, June.
    13. Yucheng Dong & Yao Li & Ying He & Xia Chen, 2021. "Preference–Approval Structures in Group Decision Making: Axiomatic Distance and Aggregation," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 273-295, December.
    14. Christian Gelleri, 2022. "Creating Monetary Collaborative Spaces for Social and Ecological Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Hengjie Zhang & Fang Wang & Huali Tang & Yucheng Dong, 2019. "An Optimization-Based Approach to Social Network Group Decision Making with an Application to Earthquake Shelter-Site Selection," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Rahel Mandaroux & Chuanwen Dong & Guodong Li, 2021. "A European Emissions Trading System Powered by Distributed Ledger Technology: An Evaluation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Cheng, Dong & Yuan, Yuxiang & Wu, Yong & Hao, Tiantian & Cheng, Faxin, 2022. "Maximum satisfaction consensus with budget constraints considering individual tolerance and compromise limit behaviors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 221-238.
    18. Seong-Kyu Kim & Jun-Ho Huh, 2020. "Blockchain of Carbon Trading for UN Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-32, May.
    19. Bhargav Appasani & Sunil Kumar Mishra & Amitkumar V. Jha & Santosh Kumar Mishra & Florentina Magda Enescu & Ioan Sorin Sorlei & Fernando Georgel Bîrleanu & Noureddine Takorabet & Phatiphat Thounthong , 2022. "Blockchain-Enabled Smart Grid Applications: Architecture, Challenges, and Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-33, July.
    20. Xiaohong Chen & Weiwei Zhang & Xuanhua Xu & Wenzhi Cao, 2022. "Managing Group Confidence and Consensus in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Large Group Decision-Making Based on Social Media Data Mining," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 995-1023, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2824-:d:340545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.