IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i6p2569-d336474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborative Learning Communities for Sustainable Employment through Visual Tools

Author

Listed:
  • Rodrigo Martín-García

    (Department of Business Economics and Accounting, National Distance Education University (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Carmen López-Martín

    (Department of Business Economics and Accounting, National Distance Education University (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Raquel Arguedas-Sanz

    (Department of Business Economics and Accounting, National Distance Education University (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Higher education institutions must enable students to acquire skills and capacities that prepare them for working life and enhance their employability. This will lead to an applied learning- and teaching-enhancement-oriented sustainable Higher Education System. This research aims to contribute to that goal by analyzing student interactions in a collaborative learning community. It assesses the impact of visual tools on academic performance and student satisfaction in employment-focused blended studies, in which enrollees were geographically dispersed undergraduates with a diversity of profiles. A financial studies learning community was created to test students’ interactions in a model conducive to participation as visual content creators and users. Three surveys (pre-project, appraisal of classmates’ visual exercises, and post-project) were conducted to assess project impact. First, we used a univariate approach, focused on students’ characteristics, course and project appraisals, and the effects of the project on academic performance and expectations. Secondly, a bivariate approach was conducted to detect relationships between respondents’ appraisals and personal characteristics and to determine whether their mean scores were the same irrespective of such characteristics. The findings showed that: (1) Students’ preferences concur with those of their employers; (2) participation in innovative initiatives improves students’ perception of course procedures; (3) visual tools have a positive impact on learning, in terms of both academic performance and student satisfaction. The study concludes by providing support for educational institutions´ decision-making around courses and the overall curricula by defining the factors determining academic performance and student satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodrigo Martín-García & Carmen López-Martín & Raquel Arguedas-Sanz, 2020. "Collaborative Learning Communities for Sustainable Employment through Visual Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2569-:d:336474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2569/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2569/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruei-Jen Diana Fan & Paul Juinn Bing Tan, 2019. "Application of Information Technology in Preschool Aesthetic Teaching from the Perspective of Sustainable Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Silvena YORDANOVA, 2016. "Creativity As Managerial Competence," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 11(4.1), pages 142-147, december.
    3. Pilar Laguna-Sánchez & Pilar Abad & Concepción de la Fuente-Cabrero & Rocío Calero, 2020. "A University Training Programme for Acquiring Entrepreneurial and Transversal Employability Skills, a Students’ Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Rizwan Raheem Ahmed & Faryal Salman & Shahab Alam Malik & Dalia Streimikiene & Riaz Hussain Soomro & Munwar Hussain Pahi, 2020. "Smartphone Use and Academic Performance of University Students: A Mediation and Moderation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-28, January.
    5. Michael Watts & Chineze Christopher, 2012. "Using Art (Paintings, Drawings, and Engravings) to Teach Economics," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 408-422, October.
    6. Pezzino, Mario, 2018. "Online assessment, adaptive feedback and the importance of visual learning for students. The advantages, with a few caveats, of using MapleTA," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 11-28.
    7. Davis, Mary E., 2015. "Bringing imagination back to the classroom: A model for creative arts in economics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 1-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Moisès Esteban-Guitart & Pilar Monreal-Bosch & Montserrat Palma & Irene González-Ceballos, 2020. "Sustaining Students’ Identities within the Context of Participatory Culture. Designing, Implementing and Evaluating an Interactive Learning Activity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Jean Hoo Fang Jing & Nurhamizah Ishak & Aqilah Arshad & Haniza Sarijari & Shahira Adam, 2025. "Assessing The Impact of Effective Team Collaboration on Individual Outcomes in Collaborative Presentation," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(4), pages 1151-1160, April.
    3. Chung Kwan Lo & Gaowei Chen, 2021. "Improving Experienced Mathematics Teachers’ Classroom Talk: A Visual Learning Analytics Approach to Professional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diaz Vidal, Daniel & Mungenast, Kyle & Diaz Vidal, Jesus, 2020. "Economics through film: Thinking like an economist," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    2. Niurka Guevara-Otero & Ana M. Vargas-Perez & Mónica Segovia-Pérez & Pilar Laguna-Sánchez, 2025. "Factors that determine the level of individual entrepreneurial orientation: profiles of," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-31, December.
    3. Halliday, Simon D. & Makler, Christopher & McKee, Douglas & Papadopoulou, Anastasia, 2024. "Improving student comprehension through interactive model visualization," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    4. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Pereira, Vijay & Islam, Nazrul & Giudice, Manlio Del & Choudrie, Jyoti, 2022. "Gamification and e-learning for young learners: A systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    5. Hussein Albazar, 2020. "A New Automated Forms Generation Algorithm for Online Assessment," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(01), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Ana López-Martínez & Lourdes Meroño & María Cánovas-López & Antonio García-de-Alcaraz & Luis Manuel Martínez-Aranda, 2022. "Using Gamified Strategies in Higher Education: Relationship between Intrinsic Motivation and Contextual Variables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Weixin Lin & Yuan-Cheng Chang & Peng-Fei Chen, 2023. "Environmental aesthetics and professional development for university teachers in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Nemanja Jovanov & Đorđe Vranješ & Goran Jovanov & Goran Otić & Jovica Vasiljević & Željko Petrić & Stojan Aleksić, 2021. "Implementation of the E-Learning Model for Sustainability of Driver Rehabilitation Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Rosa Isusi-Fagoaga & Adela García-Aracil, 2020. "Assessing Master Students’ Competencies Using Rubrics: Lessons Learned from Future Secondary Education Teachers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, November.
    10. Teen-Hang Meen & Charles Tijus & Jui-Che Tu, 2019. "Selected Papers from the Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation 2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Poonam Arora & Gwendolyn A. Tedeschi & Janet L. Rovenpor, 2018. "Broadening the Frame around Sustainability with Holistic Language: Mandela and Invictus," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 233-251, December.
    12. Carmen Elboj-Saso & Alejandra Cortés-Pascual & Tatiana Íñiguez-Berrozpe & Raquel Lozano-Blasco & Alberto Quílez-Robres, 2021. "Emotional and Educational Accompaniment through Dialogic Literary Gatherings: A Volunteer Project for Families Who Suffer Digital Exclusion in the Context of COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.
    13. Amer Mutrik Sayaf & Mahdi Mohammed Alamri & Mohammed Ayid Alqahtani & Waleed Mugahed Al-Rahmi, 2021. "Information and Communications Technology Used in Higher Education: An Empirical Study on Digital Learning as Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Danilo B. Buctot & Nami Kim & Sun-Hee Kim, 2021. "Personal Profiles, Family Environment, Patterns of Smartphone Use, Nomophobia, and Smartphone Addiction across Low, Average, and High Perceived Academic Performance Levels among High School Students i," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-19, May.
    15. Wagner, Jeffrey, 2017. "Humanities as technology in teaching economics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 35-40.
    16. Hongxiang Zhang, 2017. "Accommodating Different Learning Styles in the Teaching of Economics: with Emphasis on Fleming and Mills¡¯s Sensory-based Learning Style Typology," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 72-83, January.
    17. Morroni, Mario & Soliani, Riccardo, 2022. "Theatrical readings as a means of learning economics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    18. Kopczewski, Tomasz & Okhrimenko, Iana, 2019. "Can homo economicus be an altruist? A classroom experimental method," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Takele Ayele Lambebo & Mekonnen Bogale Abegaz, 2025. "Does how to train matter? Unveiling an effective training approach to nurture successful entrepreneurs: a systematic review," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Lavinia Cornelia Butum & Luminița Nicolescu & Sergiu Octavian Stan & Andrei Găitănaru, 2020. "Providing Sustainable Knowledge for the Young Graduates of Economic and Social Sciences. Case Study: Comparative Analysis of Required Global Competences in Two Romanian Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-29, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2569-:d:336474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.