IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i6p2524-d336096.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation and Region Division Method for Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand Based on Land Use and POI Data

Author

Listed:
  • Xiumei Tang

    (Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
    Department of Resources and Environment, National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China
    Key Laboratory of Agri-informatics, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China
    Beijing Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China)

  • Yu Liu

    (Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
    Department of Resources and Environment, National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China
    Key Laboratory of Agri-informatics, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China
    Beijing Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China)

  • Yuchun Pan

    (Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
    Department of Resources and Environment, National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China
    Key Laboratory of Agri-informatics, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China
    Beijing Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Internet of Things, Beijing 100097, China)

Abstract

Mastering the regional spatial differences of ecosystem service supply and ecosystem service demand is of great significance to scientifically planning the development and utilization of national land and maintaining healthy development of ecosystems. Based on the relationship analysis of ecosystem service supply and ecosystem service demand, this study explored the regional ecosystem service supply by ecosystem service value based on grid data and constructed an ecosystem service demand evaluation model that integrated the construction land ecosystem service demand equivalent for static aspects and the point of interest (POI) kernel density estimation for dynamic aspects on the basis of land use and POI data. In the end, it put forward a region division method for ecosystem service supply and ecosystem service demand and conducted an empirical analysis of Haidian District, Beijing. The following results were concluded: (1) the ecosystem service value of different grids in Haidian District was between RMB (Chinese monetary unit, Yuan) 0 and RMB 2.4787 million. In terms of spatial distribution, the ecosystem service supply took on an obvious trend of gradual decrease from the northwest to the southeast, with major ecosystem service supply coming from the northwest. (2) The construction land ecosystem service demand equivalent of Haidian District was characterized by a multicenter cluster: the high equivalent area was in the southeast, while the equivalent of the northwest was relatively low. POI kernel density estimation demonstrated cluster distribution, with a high kernel density estimation in the southeast, a lower kernel density estimation in the central part, and the lowest kernel density estimation in the northwest. The ecosystem service demand index also showed cluster distribution: high index in the southeast, low index in the northwest, and prominent sudden changes from the central part to the south. (3) The bivariate local spatial autocorrelation cluster diagram method was used to divide five types of ecosystem service supply and ecosystem service demand, namely non-significant correlation region, high ecosystem service supply and high ecosystem service demand region, high ecosystem service supply and low ecosystem service demand region, low ecosystem service supply and high ecosystem service demand region, low ecosystem service supply and low ecosystem service demand region. Grids with the highest ratio belonged to the non-significant correlation region; the distribution of low ecosystem service supply and high ecosystem service demand region had the greatest concentration, mainly in the southeast; the grids of high ecosystem service supply and low ecosystem service demand region were mainly present in the northwest and in a continuous way; the grids of low ecosystem service supply and low ecosystem service demand region, and high ecosystem service supply and high ecosystem service demand region were extremely few, with sporadic distribution in the central part. The research results could provide a basis for the adjustment and fine management of regional land use structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiumei Tang & Yu Liu & Yuchun Pan, 2020. "An Evaluation and Region Division Method for Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand Based on Land Use and POI Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2524-:d:336096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2524/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2524/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Mengya & Kwan, Mei-Po & Wang, Fahui & Wang, Jun, 2018. "Using points-of-interest data to estimate commuting patterns in central Shanghai, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 201-210.
    2. Yang, Qing & Liu, Gengyuan & Casazza, Marco & Campbell, Elliot T. & Giannetti, Biagio F. & Brown, Mark T., 2018. "Development of a new framework for non-monetary accounting on ecosystem services valuation," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PA), pages 37-54.
    3. Jie Bao & Chengcheng Xu & Pan Liu & Wei Wang, 2017. "Exploring Bikesharing Travel Patterns and Trip Purposes Using Smart Card Data and Online Point of Interests," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1231-1253, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xuewei Yang & Guoyi Wei & Chaozhong Liang & Zhao Yang & Huanying Fang & Shuiming Zhang, 2024. "Construction of ecological security pattern based on ecosystem service evaluation and minimal cumulative resistance model: a case study of Hefei City, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 10681-10700, April.
    2. Jiangzhou Wu & Qing Zhang & Zhida Li, 2025. "Spatial Coupling Characteristics Between Tourism Point of Interest (POI) and Nighttime Light Data of the Changsha–Zhuzhou–Xiangtan Metropolitan Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Wang, Zhuangzhuang & Fu, Bojie & Zhang, Liwei & Wu, Xutong & Li, Yingjie, 2022. "Ecosystem service assessments across cascade levels: typology and an evidence map," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    4. Ziying Hu & Siyuan Wang, 2025. "Multi-Scenario Simulation of Ecosystem Service Value in Beijing’s Green Belts Based on PLUS Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pan, Yingjiu & Chen, Shuyan & Niu, Shifeng & Ma, Yongfeng & Tang, Kun, 2020. "Investigating the impacts of built environment on traffic states incorporating spatial heterogeneity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Makovníková Jarmila & Pálka Boris & Kološta Stanislav & Flaška Filip & Orságová Katarína & Spišiaková Mária, 2020. "Non-Monetary Assessment and Mapping of the Potential of Agroecosystem Services in Rural Slovakia," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 257-276, June.
    3. Chen, Yu & Liu, Gengyuan & Yan, Ningyu & Yang, Qing & Gao, He & Su, Liya & Santagata, Remo, 2023. "Comprehensive evaluation of urban greenspace ecological values marketability through the spatial relationship between housing price and ecosystem services," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).
    4. Bi, Hui & Ye, Zhirui & Hu, Liyang & Zhu, He, 2021. "Why they don't choose bus service? Understanding special online car-hailing behavior near bus stops," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 280-297.
    5. Jianfang Liu & Qian Zhang & Qianyi Wang & Yaoping Lv & Yingqi Tang, 2023. "Gross Ecosystem Product Accounting of a Globally Important Agricultural Heritage System: The Longxian Rice–Fish Symbiotic System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Kyoungok Kim, 2024. "Discovering spatiotemporal usage patterns of a bike-sharing system by type of pass: a case study from Seoul," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1373-1407, August.
    7. Cai, Xiao & Gu, Xinyue & Silm, Siiri & Hadachi, Amnir & Jin, Tanhua & Witlox, Frank, 2025. "Differences in bike-sharing usage and its associations with station-surrounding characteristics: A multi-group analysis using machine learning techniques," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    8. Yao, Richard T. & Scarpa, Riccardo & Harrison, Duncan R. & Burns, Rhys J., 2019. "Does the economic benefit of biodiversity enhancement exceed the cost of conservation in planted forests?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Xue, Mengtian & Zhang, Bin & Chen, Siyuan & Zhao, Yuandong & Wang, Zhaohua, 2024. "How does extreme temperature affect shared travel? Evidence from bike-sharing order flow in China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    10. Li, Mengya & Kwan, Mei-Po & Wang, Fahui & Wang, Jun, 2018. "Using points-of-interest data to estimate commuting patterns in central Shanghai, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 201-210.
    11. Hua, Mingzhuang & Chen, Xuewu & Chen, Jingxu & Huang, Di & Cheng, Long, 2022. "Large-scale dockless bike sharing repositioning considering future usage and workload balance," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 605(C).
    12. Osei-Assibey Mandella Bonsu & Prof. Li Kao Dui & Liu Ruiwen & Evans Kwabena Asare & Agyemang Fredua Sylvester Prempeh, 2019. "Exclusion of Human Resource Accounting in Statement of Financial Position and its Effects on Performance: Empirical Evidence of Ghana," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Gong, Mengjie & Xin, Rui & Yang, Jian & Wang, Jiaoe & Li, Tingting & Zhang, Yujuan, 2024. "Spatio-temporal dynamics and recovery of commuting activities via bike-sharing around COVID-19: A case study of New York," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    14. Gina Porter & Jeff Turner, 2019. "Meeting Young People’s Mobility and Transport Needs: Review and Prospect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-23, November.
    15. Ana Carolina V. Nadalini & Ricardo de Araujo Kalid & Ednildo Andrade Torres, 2021. "Emergy as a Tool to Evaluate Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, June.
    16. Xinxin Zhou & Yuan Ding & Changbin Wu & Jing Huang & Chendi Hu, 2019. "Measuring the Spatial Allocation Rationality of Service Facilities of Residential Areas Based on Internet Map and Location-Based Service Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Qing Yu & Weifeng Li & Dongyuan Yang & Yingkun Xie, 2020. "Policy Zoning for Efficient Land Utilization Based on Spatio-Temporal Integration between the Bicycle-Sharing Service and the Metro Transit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Kim, Kyoungok, 2023. "Investigation of modal integration of bike-sharing and public transit in Seoul for the holders of 365-day passes," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    19. Ying Long & Yimeng Song & Long Chen, 2022. "Identifying subcenters with a nonparametric method and ubiquitous point-of-interest data: A case study of 284 Chinese cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(1), pages 58-75, January.
    20. Xing, Yingying & Wang, Ke & Lu, Jian John, 2020. "Exploring travel patterns and trip purposes of dockless bike-sharing by analyzing massive bike-sharing data in Shanghai, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2524-:d:336096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.