IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i6p2382-d334080.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Cost Benefit Analysis of Port Handling Plans for Annex IV waste of MARPOL: A Case Study in Las Palmas Port

Author

Listed:
  • Alba Martínez-López

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain)

  • Alejandro Ruiz-García

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain)

  • Ivone Pérez

    (Department of Applied Economics, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the effectiveness of Directive (EU) 2019/883 from the social interest perspective. To achieve this aim, it assesses the performance of the sewage treatment plan (Annex IV of MARPOL) in Las Palmas Port and the accomplishment of the Cost Recovery System. This involves reviewing the mandatory fees for landing the sewage in the port, the sewage treatment costs and the environmental impact of the treated effluent from the vessels (environmental benefits) and addressing technical difficulties in order to meet the normative standard required from the vessels’ sewage in the framework of Las Palmas Port. Through a cost–benefit analysis not only the current protocol for the reception and treatment of Annex IV waste in the port is assessed, but also alternative waste treatment plans (sewage routes) are discussed in terms of social interest. The results of the paper show that only when the treated sewage is reused are the costs assumed to implement the directive overtaken by the benefits gained from complying with it. Consequently, the port authorities should address their efforts in this direction, as should the policy makers, who should integrate in the international normative the collaboration of the on-board sewage treatment plants to meet the PPP (Polluter Pays Principle).

Suggested Citation

  • Alba Martínez-López & Alejandro Ruiz-García & Ivone Pérez, 2020. "Social Cost Benefit Analysis of Port Handling Plans for Annex IV waste of MARPOL: A Case Study in Las Palmas Port," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2382-:d:334080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2382/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2382/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aleksandra Łapko & Roma Strulak-Wójcikiewicz & Marek Landowski & Radosław Wieczorek, 2018. "Management of Waste Collection from Yachts and Tall Ships from the Perspective of Sustainable Water Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Giovanna Acampa & Maria Gabriella Giustra & Claudia Mariaserena Parisi, 2019. "Water Treatment Emergency: Cost Evaluation Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Butt, Nickie, 2007. "The impact of cruise ship generated waste on home ports and ports of call: A study of Southampton," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 591-598, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Athanasios A. Pallis & Aimilia A. Papachristou & Charalampos Platias, 2017. "Environmental policies and practices in Cruise Ports: Waste reception facilities in the Med," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 67(1), pages 54-70, January-M.
    2. Magdalena Kaup & Dorota Lozowicka & Agnieszka Deja & Krzysztof Czaplicki, 2021. "Concept of the E-Waste Management Model on Sea-Going Ships," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 444-458.
    3. Olivier Dehoorne & Nathalie Petit-Charles, 2011. "Cruise tourism and Cruise Industry [Tourisme de croisière et industrie de la croisière]," Post-Print hal-01368511, HAL.
    4. Joanna Kizielewicz, 2020. "Measuring the Economic and Social Contribution of Cruise Tourism Development to Coastal Tourist Destinations," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 147-171.
    5. Di Vaio, Assunta & Varriale, Luisa & Trujillo, Lourdes, 2019. "Management Control Systems in port waste management: Evidence from Italy," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 127-135.
    6. Tygran Dzhuguryan & Agnieszka Deja, 2021. "Sustainable Waste Management for a City Multifloor Manufacturing Cluster: A Framework for Designing a Smart Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, February.
    7. Merica Slišković & Helena Ukić Boljat & Igor Jelaska & Gorana Jelić Mrčelić, 2018. "Review of Generated Waste from Cruisers: Dubrovnik, Split, and Zadar Port Case Studies," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-11, November.
    8. Mirela Ștefănică & Christiana Brigitte Sandu & Gina Ionela Butnaru & Alina-Petronela Haller, 2021. "The Nexus between Tourism Activities and Environmental Degradation: Romanian Tourists’ Opinions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Yunhao Yao & Ruoquan Zheng & Merle Parmak, 2022. "Factors Influencing the Willingness to Pay in Yachting Tourism in the Context of COVID-19 Regular Prevention and Control: The Case of Dalian, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Olivier Dehoorne & Nathalie Petit-Charles & Sopheap Theng, 2011. "Cruise tourism in the world: Continuity and Recomposition [Le tourisme de croisière dans le monde : permanences et recompositions]," Post-Print hal-01368523, HAL.
    11. Morten Simonsen & Hans Jakob Walnum & Stefan Gössling, 2018. "Model for Estimation of Fuel Consumption of Cruise Ships," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-29, April.
    12. Michela Gallo & Luca Moreschi & Michela Mazzoccoli & Veronica Marotta & Adriana Del Borghi, 2020. "Sustainability in Maritime Sector: Waste Management Alternatives Evaluated in a Circular Carbon Economy Perspective," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Yunhao Yao & Ruoquan Zheng & Merle Parmak, 2021. "Examining the Constraints on Yachting Tourism Development in China: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholder Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Agnieszka Deja & Krzysztof Pietrusewicz & Magdalena Kaup & Krzysztof Czaplicki, 2021. "Designing a Ship-Generated Waste Management Plan According to the Model-Based Systems Engineering Approach," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 538-554.
    15. Eunice O. Olaniyi & Gunnar Prause & Vera Gerasimova & Tommi Inkinen, 2022. "Clean Cruise Shipping: Experience from the BSR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    16. Esther Vayá & José Ramón García & Joaquim Murillo & Javier Romaní & Jordi Suriñach, 2016. "“Economic Impact of Cruise Activity: The Port of Barcelona”," AQR Working Papers 201609, University of Barcelona, Regional Quantitative Analysis Group, revised Nov 2016.
    17. Raja Oloan Saut Gurning & Daniel Imanuel Tangkau, 2022. "The Analysis of the Conceptual Framework of Green Port Implementation in Indonesia Using Circular Economy: The Case Study of Benoa Public and Fishing Terminals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    18. Jolanta Dąbrowska & Marcin Sobota & Małgorzata Świąder & Paweł Borowski & Andrzej Moryl & Radosław Stodolak & Ewa Kucharczak & Zofia Zięba & Jan K. Kazak, 2021. "Marine Waste—Sources, Fate, Risks, Challenges and Research Needs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Wang, Shuaian & Zhen, Lu & Zhuge, Dan, 2018. "Dynamic programming algorithms for selection of waste disposal ports in cruise shipping," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 235-248.
    20. Tygran Dzhuguryan & Agnieszka Deja & Bogusz Wiśnicki & Zofia Jóźwiak, 2020. "The Design of Sustainable City Multi-Floor Manufacturing Processes Under Uncertainty in Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2382-:d:334080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.