IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i3p880-d312727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

3DPortCityMeasure: Methodology for the Comparative Study of Good Practices in Port–City Integration

Author

Listed:
  • María J. Andrade

    (Departamento Arte y Arquitectura, Escuela Tecnica Superior de Arquitectura, Universidad de Málaga, Plaza El Ejido, 2, 29013 Málaga, Spain
    CIAUD, Centro de Investigação em Arquitetura, Urbanismo e Design, Faculdade de Arquitetura, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua Sá Nogueira, Pólo Universitário do Alto da Ajuda, 1349-063 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • João Pedro Costa

    (CIAUD, Centro de Investigação em Arquitetura, Urbanismo e Design, Faculdade de Arquitetura, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua Sá Nogueira, Pólo Universitário do Alto da Ajuda, 1349-063 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • José Blasco López

    (Avda. de la Aurora, 15, 29002 Málaga, Spain)

Abstract

Most port cities have a long history of investment in the waterfront, adapting these spaces to improve the quality of life of its inhabitants and increase the tourist interest of the city, in a 50-year process of waterfront regeneration that started in the late 1960s. Even though one of the drivers of development in today’s port cities continues to be the transfer of knowledge and experiences between different cases, not all these cities have achieved their goals, nor have all done so in a sustainable way. This article exposes a new methodology, motivated by the need to carry out a comparative study of good practices of port–city integration for twelve specific cases. To enable a comparison of intangible realities such as port–city integration, it is mandatory to have a common benchmark to quantify features of cities from different cases. The 3DPortCityMeasure methodology is intended to provide a framework for analysing port-city integration, with results that supply an immediate understanding of each case. This tool enables direct comparative evaluation and provides support for land use planning and urban design approaches. The results show that the proposed approach for measuring intangible factors in the field of the port–city relationship is a very useful tool, novel in this discipline, and fully applicable to other cases and other urban issues.

Suggested Citation

  • María J. Andrade & João Pedro Costa & José Blasco López, 2020. "3DPortCityMeasure: Methodology for the Comparative Study of Good Practices in Port–City Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:880-:d:312727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/880/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/880/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monios, Jason & Bergqvist, Rickard & Woxenius, Johan, 2018. "Port-centric cities: The role of freight distribution in defining the port-city relationship," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 53-64.
    2. César Ducruet & Sung-Woo Lee, 2006. "Frontline soldiers of globalisation : Port-city evolution and regional competition," Post-Print hal-03246480, HAL.
    3. Daamen, Tom A. & Vries, Isabelle, 2013. "Governing the European port–city interface: institutional impacts on spatial projects between city and port," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 4-13.
    4. Rosa-Jiménez, Carlos & Perea-Medina, Beatriz & Andrade, María J. & Nebot, Nuria, 2018. "An examination of the territorial imbalance of the cruising activity in the main Mediterranean port destinations: Effects on sustainable transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 94-101.
    5. Narisra Limtanakool & Martin Dijst & Tim Schwanen, 2007. "A Theoretical Framework and Methodology for Characterising National Urban Systems on the Basis of Flows of People: Empirical Evidence for France and Germany," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(11), pages 2123-2145, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María J. Andrade & João Pedro Costa & Eduardo Jiménez-Morales & Jonathan Ruiz-Jaramillo, 2021. "A City Profile of Malaga: The Role of the Port-City Border throughout Historical Transformations," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 105-118.
    2. Carola Hein & Yvonne van Mil, 2020. "Mapping as Gap-Finder: Geddes, Tyrwhitt, and the Comparative Spatial Analysis of Port City Regions," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 152-166.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Qianyu & Xu, Hang & Wall, Ronald S & Stavropoulos, Spyridon, 2017. "Building a bridge between port and city: Improving the urban competitiveness of port cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 120-133.
    2. Ricardo Martín & Víctor Yepes, 2021. "Bridging the Gap between Landscape and Management within Marinas: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Caldeira dos Santos, Murillo & Pereira, Fábio Henrique, 2021. "Development and application of a dynamic model for road port access and its impacts on port-city relationship indicators," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    4. Sakalayen, Quazi & Chen, Peggy Shu-Ling & Cahoon, Stephen, 2022. "A place-based approach for ports' involvement in regional development: A mixed-method research outcome," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 16-31.
    5. Bruno Moeremans & Michaël Dooms & Elvira Haezendonck, 2023. "Long-term analysis of traffic flows in European inland ports: implications for the port–city interface," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(2), pages 272-300, June.
    6. Monios, Jason & Bergqvist, Rickard & Woxenius, Johan, 2018. "Port-centric cities: The role of freight distribution in defining the port-city relationship," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 53-64.
    7. Cong, Long-ze & Zhang, Dong & Wang, Ming-li & Xu, Hong-feng & Li, Li, 2020. "The role of ports in the economic development of port cities: Panel evidence from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 13-21.
    8. Lesley Welman & Sanette LA Ferreira, 2016. "The co-evolution of Saldanha Bay (town and hinterland) and its Port," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 31(1-2), pages 219-233, February.
    9. Hall, Stephen & Foxon, Timothy J., 2014. "Values in the Smart Grid: The co-evolving political economy of smart distribution," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 600-609.
    10. Yichao Gou & Chengjin Wang, 2022. "Identification and Differentiation of the Hierarchical Structure of the Caribbean Cruise Shipping Network Based on Route Organization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Kauffmann, Albrecht, 2012. "Delineation of City Regions Based on Commuting Interrelations: The Example of Large Cities in Germany," IWH Discussion Papers 4/2012, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    12. John E. Nyberg & Shachak Pe’eri & Susan L. Slocum & Matthew Rice & Maction Komwa & Donglian Sun, 2021. "Planning and Preparation for Cruising Infrastructure: Cuba as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    13. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Arasteh, Mojtaba, 2020. "Core-port connectivity: Towards shaping a national hinterland in a West Asia country," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 57-68.
    14. Koi Yu Adolf Ng & César Ducruet, 2014. "The changing tides of port geography (1950–2012)," Post-Print halshs-01359160, HAL.
    15. César Ducruet & Hidekazu Itoh & Justin Berli, 2020. "Urban gravity in the global container shipping network," Post-Print halshs-02588449, HAL.
    16. Jiaguo Liu & Jinxia Zhou & Fan Liu & Xiaohang Yue & Yudan Kong & Xiaoye Wang, 2019. "Interaction Analysis and Sustainable Development Strategy between Port and City: The Case of Liaoning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-25, September.
    17. Tom A. Daamen & Erik Louw, 2016. "The Challenge of the Dutch Port-City Interface," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(5), pages 642-651, December.
    18. Pere Suau-Sanchez & Guillaume Burghouwt & Xavier Fageda, 2016. "Reinterpreting EU Air Transport Deregulation: A Disaggregated Analysis of the Spatial Distribution of Traffic in Europe, 1990–2009," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(1), pages 48-65, February.
    19. Derudder, Ben & Witlox, Frank, 2009. "The impact of progressive liberalization on the spatiality of airline networks: a measurement framework based on the assessment of hierarchical differentiation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 276-284.
    20. Ducruet, César & Itoh, Hidekazu, 2022. "The spatial determinants of innovation diffusion: Evidence from global shipping networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:880-:d:312727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.