IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10604-d464733.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Potential Role of Hybrid Constructed Wetlands Treating University Wastewater—Experience from Northern Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Stevo Lavrnić

    (Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 50, 40127 Bologna, Italy)

  • Maribel Zapater Pereyra

    (Independent Researcher, Gottfried-Keller-Str. 25, 81245 Munich, Germany)

  • Sandra Cristino

    (Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Via San Giacomo 12, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Domenico Cupido

    (Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental, and Materials Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Via Umberto Terracini 28, 40131 Bologna, Italy)

  • Giovanni Lucchese

    (Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental, and Materials Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Via Umberto Terracini 28, 40131 Bologna, Italy)

  • Maria Rosaria Pascale

    (Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Via San Giacomo 12, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Attilio Toscano

    (Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 50, 40127 Bologna, Italy)

  • Maurizio Mancini

    (Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental, and Materials Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Via Umberto Terracini 28, 40131 Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

University wastewater is a type of wastewater with higher pollutants load and flow rate variability than typical domestic wastewater. Constructed wetlands (CW) could be used for university wastewater treatment and consequently for wastewater reuse. A hybrid CW pilot plant, at the University of Bologna (Italy), was monitored to assess its potential to be used at the university. Its treatment performance was monitored for one year and public acceptance explored through a survey. The pilot plant had two treatment lines, (1) a vertical flow CW (VFCW) and a planted horizontal flow CW (HFCW), and (2) the same VFCW and an unplanted horizontal flow filter (HFF). The HFCW achieved higher removals than the HFF, but it was also found to be prone to higher water losses. However, both treatment lines met the Italian limits for discharge in natural water bodies and some of the limits for wastewater reuse in Italy and the EU. The VFCW alone was not able to meet the same limits, demonstrating the advantages of hybrid over single stage CWs. A positive attitude towards CWs and wastewater reuse was found among the survey participants. Therefore, hybrid CWs (planted and unplanted) are considered a feasible technology for application at universities.

Suggested Citation

  • Stevo Lavrnić & Maribel Zapater Pereyra & Sandra Cristino & Domenico Cupido & Giovanni Lucchese & Maria Rosaria Pascale & Attilio Toscano & Maurizio Mancini, 2020. "The Potential Role of Hybrid Constructed Wetlands Treating University Wastewater—Experience from Northern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10604-:d:464733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10604/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10604/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Massimo Raboni & Renato Gavasci & Giordano Urbini, 2014. "UASB followed by Sub-Surface Horizontal Flow Phytodepuration for the Treatment of the Sewage Generated by a Small Rural Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Everard, Mark & Harrington, Rory & McInnes, Robert J., 2012. "Facilitating implementation of landscape-scale water management: The integrated constructed wetland concept," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 27-37.
    3. Chengxiang Zhang & Li Wen & Yuyu Wang & Cunqi Liu & Yan Zhou & Guangchun Lei, 2020. "Can Constructed Wetlands be Wildlife Refuges? A Review of Their Potential Biodiversity Conservation Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Angela Gorgoglione & Vincenzo Torretta, 2018. "Sustainable Management and Successful Application of Constructed Wetlands: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabio Conti & Elena Cristina Rada & Paolo Viotti & Massimo Raboni, 2021. "Removal and Survival of Fecal Indicators in a Constructed Wetland after UASB Pre-Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Karolina Jóźwiakowska & Piotr Bugajski, 2023. "Influence of the Bed Temperature on the Operational Reliability of a Hybrid Constructed Wetland Wastewater Treatment Plant in South-Western Poland—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Douglas J. Spieles, 2022. "Wetland Construction, Restoration, and Integration: A Comparative Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Justyna Drzymała & Joanna Kalka & Adam Sochacki & Ewa Felis, 2022. "Towards Sustainable Wastewater Treatment: Bioindication as a Technique for Supporting Treatment Efficiency Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Nash Jett D. G. Reyes & Franz Kevin F. Geronimo & Heidi B. Guerra & Lee-Hyung Kim, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis and Comprehensive Review of Stormwater Treatment Wetlands: Global Research Trends and Existing Knowledge Gaps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Teodoro Semeraro & Roberta Aretano & Amilcare Barca & Alessandro Pomes & Cecilia Del Giudice & Elisa Gatto & Marcello Lenucci & Riccardo Buccolieri & Rohinton Emmanuel & Zhi Gao & Alessandra Scognamig, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Design Green Infrastructure: Ecosystem Services as an Opportunity for Creating Shared Value in Ground Photovoltaic Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-28, July.
    5. Zohaib Ur Rehman Afridi & Wu Jing & Hassan Younas, 2019. "Biogas Production and Fundamental Mass Transfer Mechanism in Anaerobic Granular Sludge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Joanna Sender & Danuta Urban & Monika Różańska-Boczula & Antoni Grzywna, 2021. "Long-Term Changes in Floristic Diversity as an Effect of Transforming the Lake into a Retention Reservoir," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Mark Everard & Gaurav Kataria & Smita Kumar & Nishikant Gupta, 2021. "Assessing livelihood-ecosystem interdependencies and natural resource governance in a tribally controlled region of India’s north-eastern middle Himalayas," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7772-7790, May.
    8. Yanqin Zhang & Xianli You & Shanjun Huang & Minhua Wang & Jianwen Dong, 2022. "Knowledge Atlas on the Relationship between Water Management and Constructed Wetlands—A Bibliometric Analysis Based on CiteSpace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-28, July.
    9. Caiado Couto, Lilia & Campos, Luiza C. & da Fonseca-Zang, Warde & Zang, Joachim & Bleischwitz, Raimund, 2021. "Water, waste, energy and food nexus in Brazil: Identifying a resource interlinkage research agenda through a systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    10. Guoping Qian & Chang Wang & Xiangbing Gong & Hongyu Zhou & Jun Cai, 2022. "Design of Constructed Wetland Treatment Measures for Highway Runoff in a Water Source Protection Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-12, May.
    11. Everard, Mark, 2015. "Community-based groundwater and ecosystem restoration in semi-arid north Rajasthan (1): Socio-economic progress and lessons for groundwater-dependent areas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 125-135.
    12. Everard, Mark & Gupta, Nishikant & Chapagain, Prem S. & Shrestha, Bharat Babu & Preston, Guy & Tiwari, Prakash, 2018. "Can control of invasive vegetation improve water and rural livelihood security in Nepal?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(PA), pages 125-133.
    13. Alejandro Acero-Oliete & Pedro Luis López-Julián & Beniamino Russo & Oscar Ruiz-Lozano, 2022. "Comparative Efficiency of Two Different Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment of Small Populations in Mediterranean Continental Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Everard, Mark & Reed, Mark S. & Kenter, Jasper O., 2016. "The ripple effect: Institutionalising pro-environmental values to shift societal norms and behaviours," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PB), pages 230-240.
    15. Taerin Chung & Kwang-Yong Lee & Uk Kim, 2022. "The Impact of Sustainable Management Strategies of Sports Apparel Brands on Brand Reliability and Purchase Intention through Single Person Media during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Path Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.
    16. Fabio Conti & Elena Cristina Rada & Paolo Viotti & Massimo Raboni, 2021. "Removal and Survival of Fecal Indicators in a Constructed Wetland after UASB Pre-Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Han Li & Radmila Petric & Zinah Alazzawi & Jake Kauzlarich & Rania H. Mahmoud & Rasheed McFadden & Niklas Perslow & Andrea Rodriguez Flores & Hadi Soufi & Kristina Morales & Matina C. Kalcounis-Rueppe, 2021. "Four Years Continuous Monitoring Reveals Different Effects of Urban Constructed Wetlands on Bats," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    18. Vasileios Takavakoglou & Eleanna Pana & Dimitris Skalkos, 2022. "Constructed Wetlands as Nature-Based Solutions in the Post-COVID Agri-Food Supply Chain: Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10604-:d:464733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.