IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i23p9983-d453331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Port Cooperation and Bundling: A Way to Reduce the External Costs of Hinterland Transport

Author

Listed:
  • Joost Hintjens

    (Department TPR, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Edwin van Hassel

    (Department TPR, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Thierry Vanelslander

    (Department TPR, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Eddy Van de Voorde

    (Department TPR, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

Abstract

The present paper studies the bundling of road cargo flows of neighbouring seaports to a common hinterland. In specific cases, some hinterland flows can be too small to make bundling in a sufficient frequency possible. By combining the road freight flows of neighbouring ports, this problem can be solved. However, the additional cost of bundling and the loss of time need to be compensated for by a lower transport cost. The paper presents an empirical model for the 104 core Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) ports of the European Union (EU) and their 271 NUTS2 (Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics) hinterland regions that allows identifying opportunities for bundling as well as the direct and external cost effects. By including the value of time (VOT) of each transport mode, the generalised cost is also calculated. The result is a business model that helps port authorities, and other port actors, to identify bundling projects that will lower the direct, generalised and external costs of the hinterland connectivity, thus increasing the port attractiveness for port users as well as lowering potential aversion by the surrounding community to port operations that create hinterland nuisance.

Suggested Citation

  • Joost Hintjens & Edwin van Hassel & Thierry Vanelslander & Eddy Van de Voorde, 2020. "Port Cooperation and Bundling: A Way to Reduce the External Costs of Hinterland Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:9983-:d:453331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/9983/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/9983/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bart Wiegmans & Behzad Behdani, 2018. "A review and analysis of the investment in, and cost structure of, intermodal rail terminals," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 33-51, January.
    2. F. Coppens & F. Lagneaux & G. van Gastel & H. Meersman & N. Sellekaerts & E. Van de Voorde & Th. Vanelslander & A. Verhetsel, 2007. "Economic impact of port activity : a disaggregate analysis. The case of Antwerp," Working Paper Document 110, National Bank of Belgium.
    3. Martine Mostert & Sabine Limbourg, 2016. "External Costs as Competitiveness Factors for Freight Transport — A State of the Art," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(6), pages 692-712, November.
    4. Sabine Limbourg & Bart Jourquin, 2010. "Market area of intermodal rail‐road container terminals embedded in a hub‐and‐spoke network," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(1), pages 135-154, March.
    5. David GUERRERO & Fernando GONZALEZ LAXE & Maria-Jesus FREIRE SEOANE & Carlos PAIS MONTES, 2015. "A Geographical Analysis Of The Relationship Between Inland Accessibility And Maritime Transport Supply," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 41, pages 33-46.
    6. Pauline Wortelboer-Van Donselaar & Joost Kolkman, 2010. "Societal costs and benefits of cooperation between port authorities," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 271-284, May.
    7. Joost Hintjens, 2018. "A conceptual framework for cooperation in hinterland development between neighbouring seaport authorities," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 819-836, August.
    8. Meersman, Hilde & Van de Voorde, Eddy & Vanelslander, Thierry, 2006. "Chapter 4 Fighting for Money, Investments and Capacity: Port Governance and Devolution in Belgium," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 85-107, January.
    9. Ross Robinson, 2002. "Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 241-255.
    10. Edwin Van Hassel & Hilde Meersman & Eddy Van de Voorde & Thierry Vanelslander, 2016. "Impact of scale increase of container ships on the generalised chain cost," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 192-208, February.
    11. Marc Levinson, 2008. "Introduction to The Box: How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger," Introductory Chapters, in: The Box: How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger, Princeton University Press.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Niérat, Patrick, 2022. "Methodological shortcuts in intermodal freight transport: Critical review and proposals," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Dariusz Bernacki & Christian Lis, 2021. "Exploring the Sustainable Effects of Urban-Port Road System Reconstruction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Olena de Andres Gonzalez & Heikki Koivisto & Jari M. Mustonen & Minna M. Keinänen-Toivola, 2021. "Digitalization in Just-In-Time Approach as a Sustainable Solution for Maritime Logistics in the Baltic Sea Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caris, An & Limbourg, Sabine & Macharis, Cathy & van Lier, Tom & Cools, Mario, 2014. "Integration of inland waterway transport in the intermodal supply chain: a taxonomy of research challenges," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 126-136.
    2. César Ducruet, 2020. "The geography of maritime networks: A critical review," Post-Print halshs-02922543, HAL.
    3. Ducruet, César, 2020. "The geography of maritime networks: A critical review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    4. Balliauw, Matteo & Kort, Peter M. & Zhang, Anming, 2019. "Capacity investment decisions of two competing ports under uncertainty: A strategic real options approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 249-264.
    5. Christine Tawfik & Sabine Limbourg, 2018. "Pricing Problems in Intermodal Freight Transport: Research Overview and Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Balliauw, Matteo, 2021. "Time to build: A real options analysis of port capacity expansion investments under uncertainty," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. Moura, Ticiana Grecco Zanon & Garcia-Alonso, Lorena & del Rosal, Ignacio, 2018. "Influence of the geographical pattern of foreign trade on the inland distribution of maritime traffic," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 191-200.
    8. Yap, Wei Yim & Lam, Jasmine S.L., 2006. "Competition dynamics between container ports in East Asia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 35-51, January.
    9. Bottasso, Anna & Conti, Maurizio & Ferrari, Claudio & Tei, Alessio, 2014. "Ports and regional development: A spatial analysis on a panel of European regions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 44-55.
    10. Zhang, Qiang & Zheng, Shiyuan & Geerlings, Harry & El Makhloufi, Abdel, 2019. "Port governance revisited: How to govern and for what purpose?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 46-57.
    11. van Hassel, Edwin & Vanelslander, Thierry & Neyens, Kris & Vandeborre, Hans & Kindt, Dominique & Kellens, Stefan, 2022. "Reconsidering nearshoring to avoid global crisis impacts: Application and calculation of the total cost of ownership for specific scenarios," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    12. Yang, Zaili & Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Wang, Jin, 2014. "A new risk quantification approach in port facility security assessment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 72-90.
    13. Daniel Olivier & Brian Slack, 2006. "Rethinking the Port," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(8), pages 1409-1427, August.
    14. van Asperen, E. & Dekker, R., 2010. "Flexibility in Port Selection: A Quantitative Approach Using Floating Stocks," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2009-44, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    15. Wouter Jacobs & Theo Notteboom, 2011. "An Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Port Systems: The Role of Windows of Opportunity in Shaping Seaport Competition," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(7), pages 1674-1692, July.
    16. Yiran Sun & Yuqian Wang & Jingci Xie, 2022. "The co-evolution of seaports and dry ports in Shandong province in China under the Belt and Road Initiative," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, December.
    17. Andrzej Bochniak & Monika Stoma, 2021. "Estimating the Optimal Location for the Storage of Pellet Surplus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Su-Han Woo & Stephen Pettit & Anthony Beresford & Dong-Wook Kwak, 2012. "Seaport Research: A Decadal Analysis of Trends and Themes Since the 1980s," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 351-377, January.
    19. Elifcan Göçmen & Rızvan Erol, 2018. "The Problem of Sustainable Intermodal Transportation: A Case Study of an International Logistics Company, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    20. Austin Becker & Michele Acciaro & Regina Asariotis & Edgard Cabrera & Laurent Cretegny & Philippe Crist & Miguel Esteban & Andrew Mather & Steve Messner & Susumu Naruse & Adolf Ng & Stefan Rahmstorf &, 2013. "A note on climate change adaptation for seaports: a challenge for global ports, a challenge for global society," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 120(4), pages 683-695, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:9983-:d:453331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.