IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i23p9856-d450923.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Impact Assessment of HealthyAIR Tool for Real-Time Detection of Pollution Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Antonia Moreno Cano

    (eVIDA Research Group, University of Deusto, Avd. de las Universidades, 24, 48007 Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain)

  • Rafael Romón Sagredo

    (eVIDA Research Group, University of Deusto, Avd. de las Universidades, 24, 48007 Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain)

  • Rocío García-Carrión

    (Faculty of Psychology & Education, University of Deusto, Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, Avd. de las Universidades, 24, 48007 Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain)

  • Begonya Garcia-Zapirain

    (eVIDA Research Group, University of Deusto, Avd. de las Universidades, 24, 48007 Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain)

Abstract

Background: HealthyAIR is a tool that detects pollution risk in real life. The target population is people with cardiorespiratory complications who are especially susceptible to the current COVID-19. The goal is to empower people by controlling air pollution everywhere to minimize the risk of having a seizure. Methods: We measured the social impact of the HealthyAIR tool using a Likert scale survey with two groups: professionals (engineers/healthcare) and end-users. We assessed the data in accordance with the indicators for social impact defined for the Key Impact Pathways introduced by the European Commission for Horizon Europe, and the criteria of the Social Impact Open Repository (SIOR). Results: Professionals highlight the fact that they “totally agree” (33.33%) and “agree” (26.67%) that HealthyAIR could help authorities improve their health prevention policies and programs. Users considered the tool to be “very useful” (38.46%) and “quite useful” (42.31%), which denotes its necessity. Conclusions: professionals and end users see HealthyAIR as a great preventative tool, with the former seeing it as a way to avoid seizures in their patients who, in this COVID-19 era, are particularly sensitive to any cardiorespiratory health problem. However, users suggest improving the user’s manual to make it more understandable.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonia Moreno Cano & Rafael Romón Sagredo & Rocío García-Carrión & Begonya Garcia-Zapirain, 2020. "Social Impact Assessment of HealthyAIR Tool for Real-Time Detection of Pollution Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:9856-:d:450923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/9856/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/9856/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramon Flecha & Marta Soler-Gallart & Teresa Sordé, 2015. "Europe must fund social sciences," Nature, Nature, vol. 528(7581), pages 193-193, December.
    2. R. D. Boschloo, 1970. "Raised conditional level of significance for the 2 × 2‐table when testing the equality of two probabilities," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 24(1), pages 1-9, March.
    3. Emanuela Reale & Dragana Avramov & Kubra Canhial & Claire Donovan & Ramon Flecha & Poul Holm & Charles Larkin & Benedetto Lepori & Judith Mosoni-Fried & Esther Oliver & Emilia Primeri & Lidia Puigvert, 2018. "A review of literature on evaluating the scientific, social and political impact of social sciences and humanities research," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(4), pages 298-308.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan Camilo Gomez-Zapata & Cristhian Parrado & Theresa Frimberger & Fernando Barragán-Ochoa & Fabio Brill & Kerstin Büche & Michael Krautblatter & Michael Langbein & Massimiliano Pittore & Hugo Rosero, 2021. "Community Perception and Communication of Volcanic Risk from the Cotopaxi Volcano in Latacunga, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristina Mendoza-Holgado & Pablo A. Cantero-Garlito & Sabina Barrios-Fernandez, 2023. "Gender Composition in Occupational Therapy Journals’ Editorial Boards," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Lidia Puigvert & Marta Soler-Gallart & Ana Vidu, 2022. "From Bystanders to Upstanders: Supporters and Key Informants for Victims of Gender Violence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Alba Viana Lora & Marta Gemma Nel-lo Andreu, 2020. "Alternative Metrics for Assessing the Social Impact of Tourism Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-12, May.
    4. Ole Henning Sørensen & Jakob Bjørner & Andreas Holtermann & Johnny Dyreborg & Jorid Birkelund Sørli & Jesper Kristiansen & Steffen Bohni Nielsen, 2022. "Measuring societal impact of research—Developing and validating an impact instrument for occupational health and safety," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 118-131.
    5. Blanca L. Díaz Mariño & Frida Carmina Caballero-Rico & Ramón Ventura Roque Hernández & José Alberto Ramírez de León & Daniel Alejandro González-Bandala, 2021. "Towards the Construction of Productive Interactions for Social Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    6. James A. Cunningham & Kristel Miller & Jose-Luis Perea-Vicente, 2024. "Academic entrepreneurship in the humanities and social sciences: a systematic literature review and research agenda," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 1880-1913, October.
    7. Bartke, Simon & Friedl, Andreas & Gelhaar, Felix & Reh, Laura, 2017. "Social comparison nudges—Guessing the norm increases charitable giving," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 73-75.
    8. Concepta McManus & Abilio Afonso Baeta Neves & Alvaro Toubes Prata, 2021. "Scientific publications from non-academic sectors and their impact," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(11), pages 8887-8911, November.
    9. Stefan Wellek, 2015. "Nearly exact sample size calculation for powerful non-randomized tests for differences between binomial proportions," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 69(4), pages 358-373, November.
    10. Wang, Zuzheng & Lu, Yongxu & Zhou, Yuanyuan & Ji, Jiaojiao, 2024. "SMIAltmetric: A comprehensive metric for evaluating social media impact of scientific papers on Twitter (X)," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3).
    11. Martin Andres, A. & Mato, A. Silva & Garcia, J. M. Tapia & Quevedo, M. J. Sanchez, 2004. "Comparing the asymptotic power of exact tests in 2x2 tables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 745-756, November.
    12. Cristina M. Pulido & Laura Ruiz-Eugenio & Gisela Redondo-Sama & Beatriz Villarejo-Carballido, 2020. "A New Application of Social Impact in Social Media for Overcoming Fake News in Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Blanco, Mariana & Engelmann, Dirk & Koch, Alexander K. & Normann, Hans-Theo, 2014. "Preferences and beliefs in a sequential social dilemma: a within-subjects analysis," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 122-135.
    14. Skipka, G. & Munk, A. & Freitag, G., 2004. "Unconditional exact tests for the difference of binomial probabilities--contrasted and compared," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 757-773, November.
    15. Chi-Swian Wong, 2021. "Science Mapping: A Scientometric Review on Resource Curses, Dutch Diseases, and Conflict Resources during 1993–2020," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-48, July.
    16. Václav Linkov & Kieran O’Doherty & Eunsoo Choi & Gyuseog Han, 2021. "Linguistic Diversity Index: A Scientometric Measure to Enhance the Relevance of Small and Minority Group Languages," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, April.
    17. Jorrit P Smit & Laurens K Hessels, 2021. "The production of scientific and societal value in research evaluation: a review of societal impact assessment methods [Systems Thinking, Knowledge and Action: Towards Better Models and Methods]," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(3), pages 323-335.
    18. Zhenyu Gou & Fan Meng & Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez & Yi Bu, 2022. "Encoding the citation life-cycle: the operationalization of a literature-aging conceptual model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 5027-5052, August.
    19. Emilia Aiello & Ainhoa Flecha & Olga Serradell, 2018. "Exploring the Barriers: A Qualitative Study about the Experiences of Mid-SES Roma Navigating the Spanish Healthcare System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, February.
    20. Andrea Bonaccorsi & Filippo Chiarello & Gualtiero Fantoni, 2021. "Impact for whom? Mapping the users of public research with lexicon-based text mining," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1745-1774, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:23:p:9856-:d:450923. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.