IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p9270-d441699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community-Based Processes for Revitalizing Heritage: Questioning Justice in the Experimental Practice of Ecomuseums

Author

Listed:
  • Giusy Pappalardo

    (Ecological Planning and Territorial Design Laboratory (LabPEAT), Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 64, 95123 Catania, Italy)

Abstract

Heritage is not only what societies inherit from the past: it is also an opportunity for practicing the principles of sustainability in the making of the future. A community-based approach is pivotal for generating long lasting processes aimed at revitalizing heritage. This assertion has been widely stated in several norms and conventions, such as the 2000 European Landscape Convention and the 2005 European Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society. Some practices aimed at revitalizing heritage with a community-based approach can be ascribed to the organizational form of the so-called ecomuseums, born in France in the 1970s and today spread worldwide. Ecomuseums soon became a tool for organizing community-based processes aimed at protecting and enhancing heritage in its various facets while promoting local development. However, not every existing ecomuseum is also able to grasp the opportunity of including disadvantaged persons and guaranteeing the right to heritage for all. This paper discusses the innovative elements and criticalities of ecomuseums, questioning how could they target heritage’s enhancement as well as justice simultaneously. This paper gains evidence from an ongoing action-research process and provides policy recommendations for EU southern regions that are now starting to experiment with the practice of ecomuseums, such as Sicily (IT).

Suggested Citation

  • Giusy Pappalardo, 2020. "Community-Based Processes for Revitalizing Heritage: Questioning Justice in the Experimental Practice of Ecomuseums," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9270-:d:441699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9270/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9270/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glenn C. Sutter & Tobias Sperlich & Douglas Worts & René Rivard & Lynne Teather, 2016. "Fostering Cultures of Sustainability through Community-Engaged Museums: The History and Re-Emergence of Ecomuseums in Canada and the USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Luigi Petti & Claudia Trillo & Busisiwe Ncube Makore, 2020. "Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development Targets: A Possible Harmonisation? Insights from the European Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Laura Saija & Daniela De Leo & John Forester & Giusy Pappalardo & Ives Rocha & Bjørn Sletto & Jason Corburn & Baraka Mwau & Alberto Magnaghi, 2017. "Learning from practice: environmental and community mapping as participatory action research in planning," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 127-153, January.
    4. Laura Saija, 2014. "Proactive conservancy in a contested milieu: from social mobilisation to community-led resource management in the Simeto Valley," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(1), pages 27-49, January.
    5. Francesca Simeoni & Veronica De Crescenzo, 2018. "Ecomuseums (on Clean Energy), Cycle Tourism and Civic Crowdfunding: A New Match for Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    6. David Harvey, 2003. "The right to the city," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 939-941, December.
    7. Zhen-Hui Liu & Yung-Jaan Lee, 2015. "A Method for Development of Ecomuseums in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Kuo-Wei Hsu & Meng-Li Lin & Jen-Chih Chao & Shu-Fang Huang, 2018. "Constructing an Evaluation Framework for Eco-Museum Operations-Management Performance, Based on the Case of Jhushan, Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, June.
    9. Giusy Pappalardo, 2017. "Giusy Pappalardo responds to her commentators of the “Learning from practice: environmental and community mapping as participatory action research in planning” (Volume 18, 2017, Issue 1)," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 513-515, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessandro Lo Faro & Alessia Miceli, 2021. "New Life for Disused Religious Heritage: A Sustainable Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Gina Rico Mendez & Giusy Pappalardo & Bryan Farrell, 2021. "Practicing Fair and Sustainable Local Food Systems: Elements of Food Citizenship in the Simeto River Valley," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Magdalena Roszczyńska-Kurasińska & Anna Domaradzka & Bartosz Ślosarski & Agata Żbikowska, 2021. "Facebook Data as Part of Cultural Heritage Investments Toolbox: Pilot Analysis of Users Interests and Preferences Concerning Adaptive Reuse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gina Rico Mendez & Giusy Pappalardo & Bryan Farrell, 2021. "Practicing Fair and Sustainable Local Food Systems: Elements of Food Citizenship in the Simeto River Valley," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Francesca Simeoni & Veronica De Crescenzo, 2018. "Ecomuseums (on Clean Energy), Cycle Tourism and Civic Crowdfunding: A New Match for Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Eduard Cristobal-Fransi & Natalia Daries & Eva Martin-Fuentes & Yolanda Montegut-Salla, 2020. "Industrial Heritage 2.0: Internet Presence and Development of the Electronic Commerce of Industrial Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Jirawan Sirivanichkul & Koompong Noobanjong & Supornchai Saengratwatchara & Weeranan Damrongsakul & Chaturong Louhapensang, 2018. "Interpretation of a Local Museum in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-33, July.
    5. Mara Cerquetti & Concetta Ferrara, 2018. "Marketing Research for Cultural Heritage Conservation and Sustainability: Lessons from the Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Fancello, Giovanna & Tsoukiàs, Alexis, 2021. "Learning urban capabilities from behaviours. A focus on visitors values for urban planning," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    7. Ernestyna Szpakowska-Loranc, 2021. "Multi-Attribute Analysis of Contemporary Cultural Buildings in the Historic Urban Fabric as Sustainable Spaces—Krakow Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    8. Jesús M. González-Pérez, 2022. "Evictions, Foreclosures, and Global Housing Speculation in Palma, Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-26, February.
    9. Yikang Sun & Chia-Chan Liao & Sai-Ching Chang & Rungtai Lin, 2022. "The Communication Mechanism in the Workshop and Its Implications for the Sustainable Development of Traditional Crafts: A Case Study of Lacquer Culture in Taomi Eco-Village," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, October.
    10. Mercè Roca & Jaume Albertí & Alba Bala & Laura Batlle-Bayer & Joan Ribas-Tur & Pere Fullana-i-Palmer, 2021. "Sustainability in the Opera Sector: Main Drivers and Limitations to Improve the Environmental Performance of Scenography," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    11. Clara Irazábal, 2009. "One Size Does Not Fit All: Land Markets and Property Rights for the Construction of the Just City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 558-563, June.
    12. Joris Van Doorsselaere, 2021. "Connecting Sustainable Development and Heritage Education? An Analysis of the Curriculum Reform in Flemish Public Secondary Schools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    13. IOVINO, Giorgia, 2017. "Waterfront Urbani: Approcci Rigenerativi e Visioni di Città," CELPE Discussion Papers 148, CELPE - CEnter for Labor and Political Economics, University of Salerno, Italy.
    14. Maria-Lluïsa Marsal-Llacuna, 2016. "City Indicators on Social Sustainability as Standardization Technologies for Smarter (Citizen-Centered) Governance of Cities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 1193-1216, September.
    15. Viccaro, Mauro & Romano, Severino & Prete, Carmelina & Cozzi, Mario, 2021. "Rural planning? An integrated dynamic model for assessing quality of life at a local scale," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    16. K. C. Ho, 2021. "Land and Housing in Singapore: Three Conversations with Anne Haila," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 325-351, March.
    17. Junxi Qian, 2015. "No right to the street: Motorcycle taxis, discourse production and the regulation of unruly mobility," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(15), pages 2922-2947, November.
    18. Murray, Michael, 2013. "Economic Democracy," MPRA Paper 49755, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Juliet Carpenter & Christina Horvath & Ben Spencer, 2021. "Co-Creation as an agonistic practice in the favela of Santa Marta, Rio de Janeiro," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(9), pages 1906-1923, July.
    20. Carijn Beumer, 2017. "Sustopia or Cosmopolis? A Critical Reflection on the Sustainable City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9270-:d:441699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.