IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p9173-d440062.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

(In)Sustainability of the Territory of Chapada Do Apodi-Rn (Brazil): The Expansion of Agribusiness versus the Impacts of Traditional Farmers and Local Rural Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Luís de Oliveira Pinto Filho

    (Centro de Estudos de Geografia e Ordenamento do Território—CEGOT, Universidade de Coimbra—UC, 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal
    Campus Pau dos Ferros, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido—UFERSA, Pau dos Ferros 59.900-000, RN, Brazil)

  • Alana Ticiane Alves do Rêgo

    (Departamento de Engenharias e Tecnologia, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido—UFERSA, Pau dos Ferros 59.900-000, RN, Brazil)

  • Anderson Rodrigo da Silva Lunes

    (Departamento de Engenharias e Tecnologia, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido—UFERSA, Pau dos Ferros 59.900-000, RN, Brazil)

  • Lucio Cunha

    (Centro de Estudos de Geografia e Ordenamento do Território—CEGOT, Universidade de Coimbra—UC, 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal)

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate the conditions of family agriculture and the respective environmental impacts of agribusiness. The research methodology is grounded on a theoretical survey of study descriptions of the area, a characterization of rural communities and local population through interviews, an identification of medium and large agricultural enterprises through documentary research on environmental licensing processes, and determination of the environmental impacts of agribusiness via an interaction matrix. Based on the data generated, it was found that the majority of the population has an incomplete elementary education; is involved in agricultural activity, livestock farming, and honey production, which provide a family income of up to one minimum wage; and is located in rural communities with environmental sanitation restrictions. Moreover, it was found that irrigated agriculture has positive impacts, such as the generation of employment and income. It was also evidenced that this activity causes adverse socioeconomic impacts and adverse impacts on the traditional activities of local rural communities through plant removal, water scarcity, and pesticide use. Thus, to mitigate the problems, it is necessary to apply the principles of Brazilian Environmental Law as correlated with the instruments of the National Environment Policy through environmental management guidelines.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Luís de Oliveira Pinto Filho & Alana Ticiane Alves do Rêgo & Anderson Rodrigo da Silva Lunes & Lucio Cunha, 2020. "(In)Sustainability of the Territory of Chapada Do Apodi-Rn (Brazil): The Expansion of Agribusiness versus the Impacts of Traditional Farmers and Local Rural Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9173-:d:440062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9173/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9173/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dolinska, Aleksandra & d'Aquino, Patrick, 2016. "Farmers as agents in innovation systems. Empowering farmers for innovation through communities of practice," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 122-130.
    2. Joaquim J. M. Guilhoto & Silvio M. Ichihara & Fernando Gaiger Silveira & Bernardo P. Campolina Diniz & Carlos R. Azzoni & Guilherme R. C. Moreira, 2007. "A Importância Da Agricultura Familiar No Brasil E Em Seus Estados," Anais do XXXV Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 35th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 089, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evelien Cronin & Sylvie Fosselle & Elke Rogge & Robert Home, 2021. "An Analytical Framework to Study Multi-Actor Partnerships Engaged in Interactive Innovation Processes in the Agriculture, Forestry, and Rural Development Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Bonamigo, Andrei & Ferenhof, Helio Aisenberg & Forcellini, Fernando Antonio, 2017. "Dairy Ecosystem Barriers Exposed - A Case Study In A Family Production Unit At Western Santa Catarina, Brazil," Organizações Rurais e Agroindustriais/Rural and Agro-Industrial Organizations, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Departamento de Administracao e Economia, vol. 19(1), January.
    3. Eastwood, C.R. & Turner, F.J. & Romera, A.J., 2022. "Farmer-centred design: An affordances-based framework for identifying processes that facilitate farmers as co-designers in addressing complex agricultural challenges," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    4. Verburg, René W. & Verberne, Emma & Negro, Simona O., 2022. "Accelerating the transition towards sustainable agriculture: The case of organic dairy farming in the Netherlands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    5. Tran, Thong Anh & Nguyen, Tri Huu & Vo, Thang Tat, 2019. "Adaptation to flood and salinity environments in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta: Empirical analysis of farmer-led innovations," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 89-97.
    6. Ivano Scotti & Corrado Ievoli & Letizia Bindi & Sara Bispini & Angelo Belliggiano, 2023. "Facing Climate Vulnerability in Mountain Areas: The Role of Rural Actors’ Agency and Situated Knowledge Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Fieldsend, Andrew F. & Varga, Eszter & Biró, Szabolcs & Von Münchhausen, Susanne & Häring, Anna Maria, 2022. "Multi-actor co-innovation partnerships in agriculture, forestry and related sectors in Europe: Contrasting approaches to implementation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    8. Slijper, Thomas & Urquhart, Julie & Poortvliet, P. Marijn & Soriano, Bárbara & Meuwissen, Miranda P.M., 2022. "Exploring how social capital and learning are related to the resilience of Dutch arable farmers," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    9. Kathrin Hasler & Hans-Werner Olfs & Onno Omta & Stefanie Bröring, 2016. "Drivers for the Adoption of Eco-Innovations in the German Fertilizer Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Vincent R. Nyirenda & Bimo A. Nkhata & Oscar Tembo & Susan Siamundele, 2018. "Elephant Crop Damage: Subsistence Farmers’ Social Vulnerability, Livelihood Sustainability and Elephant Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Michalscheck, M. & Groot, J.C.J. & Kotu, B. & Hoeschle-Zeledon, I. & Kuivanen, K. & Descheemaeker, K. & Tittonell, P., 2018. "Model results versus farmer realities. Operationalizing diversity within and among smallholder farm systems for a nuanced impact assessment of technology packages," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 164-178.
    12. Lawrence, Anna & Deuffic, Philippe & Hujala, Teppo & Nichiforel, Liviu & Feliciano, Diana & Jodlowski, Krzysztof & Lind, Torgny & Marchal, Didier & Talkkari, Ari & Teder, Meelis & Vilkriste, Lelde & W, 2020. "Extension, advice and knowledge systems for private forestry: Understanding diversity and change across Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    13. Camille Robert-Boeuf, 2023. "Promoting Rural Regeneration and Sustainable Farming near Cities Thanks to Facilitating Operators in France? The Case of the Versailles Plain’s Association Governance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Costin Lianu & Irina Gabriela Radulescu & Simona Corina Dobre Gudei & Cosmin Lianu & Veronica Mindrescu, 2022. "Cohesion Forces Determinants in Cluster Development: A Study Case for Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-12, March.
    15. Vik, Jostein & Stræte, Egil Petter, 2017. "Embedded Competence: A Study of Farmers’ Relation to Competence and Knowledge," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2017(1), June.
    16. Maria, Kernecker & Maria, Busse & Andrea, Knierim, 2021. "Exploring actors, their constellations, and roles in digital agricultural innovations," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    17. Vik, Jostein & Stræte, Egil Petter, 2017. "Embedded Competence: A Study of Farmers’ Relation to Competence and Knowledge," 2018 International European Forum (163rd EAAE Seminar), February 5-9, 2018, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 276932, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    18. Medina, Gabriel & Almeida, Camila & Novaes, Evandro & Godar, Javier & Pokorny, Benno, 2015. "Development Conditions for Family Farming: Lessons From Brazil," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 386-396.
    19. Lima, Daniela Oliveira de & Crouzeilles, Renato & Vieira, Marcus Vinícius, 2020. "Integrating strict protection and sustainable use areas to preserve the Brazilian Pampa biome through conservation planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    20. Kernecker, Maria & Seufert, Verena & Chapman, Mollie, 2021. "Farmer-centered ecological intensification: Using innovation characteristics to identify barriers and opportunities for a transition of agroecosystems towards sustainability," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9173-:d:440062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.