IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i15p5907-d388174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Social Outcomes from Urban Transport Infrastructure: Long-Term Consequences of Spatial Changes and Varied Interests at Multiple Levels

Author

Listed:
  • Juhyun Lee

    (Faculty of Spatial Science, University of Groningen, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Jos Arts

    (Faculty of Spatial Science, University of Groningen, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Frank Vanclay

    (Faculty of Spatial Science, University of Groningen, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • John Ward

    (The Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, London WC1H 0NN, UK)

Abstract

This paper investigates how social outcomes from urban transport projects typically play out by reflecting on multi-scale spatial changes induced by projects over time, and the extent to which such changes meet varied interests in project outcomes. We use a multi-methods case study approach using two exemplars, a metro project in London and Seoul, which established extensive public transport networks to support urban growth. Our study highlighted that urban transport network expansion does not always enhance life opportunities for all due to intermediate and cumulative impacts of spatial changes induced by projects. Immediate benefits such as enhanced accessibility were often undermined by long-term consequences of incremental spatial changes at local scales. This study also indicated that differential patterns of spatial changes around nodes between centre and periphery could be attributed to multiple negative impacts on people living in the most deprived areas. To enhance social outcomes, we suggest an integrated approach to urban transport and spatial development that focuses on scale and temporal dimensions of spatial transformation enacted by projects. In conclusion, achieving sustainable and equitable effects from urban transport infrastructure requires careful examination of broader societal consequences of long-term spatial changes and locational contexts, especially function and socio-economic conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Juhyun Lee & Jos Arts & Frank Vanclay & John Ward, 2020. "Examining the Social Outcomes from Urban Transport Infrastructure: Long-Term Consequences of Spatial Changes and Varied Interests at Multiple Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:5907-:d:388174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/5907/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/5907/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank Vanclay, 2015. "The Potential Application of Qualitative Evaluation Methods in European Regional Development: Reflections on the Use of Performance Story Reporting in Australian Natural Resource Management," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(8), pages 1326-1339, August.
    2. Karen Lucas & Bert Wee & Kees Maat, 2016. "A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 473-490, May.
    3. Bruno Zanon, 2011. "Infrastructure Network Development, Re-territorialization Processes and Multilevel Territorial Governance: A Case Study in Northern Italy," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 325-347.
    4. David Levinson, 2002. "Identifying Winners and Losers in Transportation," Working Papers 200204, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    5. Marco Te Brömmelstroet & Luca Bertolini, 2010. "Integrating land use and transport knowledge in strategy-making," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 85-104, January.
    6. Giovanni Vecchio & Riccardo Porreca & Daniela Jácome Rivera, 2020. "Socio-Spatial Concerns in Urban Mobility Planning: Insights from Competing Policies in Quito," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Gerard Hoekveld & Barrie Needham, 2013. "Planning Practice between Ethics and the Power Game: Making and Applying an Ethical Code for Planning Agencies," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1638-1653, September.
    8. Hugo Priemus & Bent Flyvbjerg & Bert van Wee (ed.), 2008. "Decision-Making on Mega-Projects," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 4112.
    9. Irène Mboumoua, 2017. "Revisiting the growth coalition concept to analyse the success of the Crossrail London megaproject," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 314-331, February.
    10. Karel Martens, 2012. "Justice in transport as justice in accessibility: applying Walzer’s ‘Spheres of Justice’ to the transport sector," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 1035-1053, November.
    11. Neil Brenner, 2000. "The Urban Question: Reflections on Henri Lefebvre, Urban Theory and the Politics of scale," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 361-378, June.
    12. Jones, Peter & Lucas, Karen, 2012. "The social consequences of transport decision-making: clarifying concepts, synthesising knowledge and assessing implications," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 4-16.
    13. Eda Beyazit, 2010. "Evaluating Social Justice in Transport: Lessons to be Learned from the Capability Approach," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 117-134, June.
    14. Rafael H. M. Pereira & Tim Schwanen & David Banister, 2017. "Distributive justice and equity in transportation," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 170-191, March.
    15. Aspa Gospodini, 2005. "Urban development, redevelopment and regeneration encouraged by transport infrastructure projects: The case study of 12 European cities," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(7), pages 1083-1111, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dietmar Göhlich & Kai Nagel & Anne Magdalene Syré & Alexander Grahle & Kai Martins-Turner & Ricardo Ewert & Ricardo Miranda Jahn & Dominic Jefferies, 2021. "Integrated Approach for the Assessment of Strategies for the Decarbonization of Urban Traffic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-31, January.
    2. Gbban, Abdulrhman M. & Kamruzzaman, Md. & Delbosc, Alexa & Coxon, Selby, 2023. "The wider barrier effects of public transport infrastructure: The case of level crossings in Melbourne," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. Anna Brzozowska & Jerzy Korczak & Antonina Kalinichenko & Dagmara Bubel & Katarzyna Sukiennik & Daniel Sikora & Jan Stebila, 2021. "Analysis of Pollutant Emissions on City Arteries—Aspects of Transport Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ryan, Jean & Martens, Karel, 2023. "Defining and implementing a sufficient level of accessibility: What’s stopping us?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Lin, Joanne Yuh-Jye & Jenelius, Erik & Cebecauer, Matej & Rubensson, Isak & Chen, Cynthia, 2023. "The equity of public transport crowding exposure," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    3. Massingue, Suzanna Allen & Oviedo, Daniel, 2021. "Walkability and the Right to the city: A snapshot critique of pedestrian space in Maputo, Mozambique," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    4. Song, Yena & Kim, Hyun & Lee, Keumsook & Ahn, Kwangwon, 2018. "Subway network expansion and transit equity: A case study of Gwangju metropolitan area, South Korea," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 148-158.
    5. Linovski, Orly & Manaugh, Kevin & Baker, Dwayne Marshall, 2022. "The route not taken: Equity and transparency in unfunded transit proposals," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 77-84.
    6. Liu, Qiyang & Lucas, Karen & Marsden, Greg & Liu, Yang, 2019. "Egalitarianism and public perception of social inequities: A case study of Beijing congestion charge," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 47-62.
    7. Luis A. Guzman & Daniel Oviedo & Rafael Cardona, 2018. "Accessibility Changes: Analysis of the Integrated Public Transport System of Bogotá," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Oviedo, Daniel & Cavoli, Clemence & Levy, Caren & Koroma, Braima & Macarthy, Joseph & Sabogal, Orlando & Arroyo, Fatima & Jones, Peter, 2022. "Accessibility and sustainable mobility transitions in Africa: Insights from Freetown," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    9. Jin, Tanhua & Cheng, Long & Wang, Kailai & Cao, Jun & Huang, Haosheng & Witlox, Frank, 2022. "Examining equity in accessibility to multi-tier healthcare services across different income households using estimated travel time," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 1-13.
    10. Boisjoly, Geneviève & Serra, Bernardo & Oliveira, Gabriel T. & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2020. "Accessibility measurements in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Curitiba and Recife, Brazil," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. Herszenhut, Daniel & Pereira, Rafael H. M. & da Silva Portugal, Licinio & de Sousa Oliveira, Matheus Henrique, 2021. "The impact of transit monetary costs on transport equity analyses," OSF Preprints e3tac, Center for Open Science.
    12. Singer, Matan E. & Cohen-Zada, Aviv L. & Martens, Karel, 2022. "Core versus periphery: Examining the spatial patterns of insufficient accessibility in U.S. metropolitan areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    13. Daniel Oviedo & Luis A. Guzman, 2020. "Revisiting Accessibility in a Context of Sustainable Transport: Capabilities and Inequalities in Bogotá," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Turbay, André L. B. & Pereira, Rafael H. M. & Firmino, Rodrigo, 2022. "The equity implications of TOD in Curitiba," SocArXiv cj87q, Center for Open Science.
    15. Luz, Gregório & Barboza, Matheus H.C. & Portugal, Licinio & Giannotti, Mariana & van Wee, Bert, 2022. "Does better accessibility help to reduce social exclusion? Evidence from the city of São Paulo, Brazil," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 186-217.
    16. Nazari Adli, Saeid & Donovan, Stuart, 2018. "Right to the city: Applying justice tests to public transport investments," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 56-65.
    17. Stewart, Anson F. & Zegras, P. Christopher, 2016. "CoAXs: A Collaborative Accessibility-based Stakeholder Engagement System for communicating transport impacts," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 423-433.
    18. Xia, Jianhong(Cecilia) & Nesbitt, Joshua & Daley, Rebekah & Najnin, Arfanara & Litman, Todd & Tiwari, Surya Prasad, 2016. "A multi-dimensional view of transport-related social exclusion: A comparative study of Greater Perth and Sydney," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 205-221.
    19. Vecchio, Giovanni, 2020. "Microstories of everyday mobilities and opportunities in Bogotá: A tool for bringing capabilities into urban mobility planning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    20. Navid Nadimi & Rosalia Camporeale & Mostafa Khaleghi & Mohamadreza Haghani & Abbas Sheykhfard & Khaled Shaaban, 2023. "A Method to Determine an Equity Score for Transportation Systems in the Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:5907-:d:388174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.