IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i12p4866-d371593.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Study of Gaining More Detailed Variability Information of Soil Organic Carbon in Surface Soils and Its Significance to Enriching the Existing Soil Database

Author

Listed:
  • Zhongqi Zhang

    (School of Geography, Geomatics, and Planning, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China)

  • Jingzhang Li

    (School of Geography, Geomatics, and Planning, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China)

  • Chun-Chih Tsui

    (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan)

  • Zueng-Sang Chen

    (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan)

Abstract

To meet the increasing demands of precision agricultural and environmental management, more abundant and accurate information is needed to describe soil organic carbon (SOC) vertical variation. Based on 923 soil profiles (collected at the depths of 0–15, 15–30, 30–60, 60–90, 90–120, and 120–150 cm) in the central area of Changhua County, Taiwan, the distribution curve of the SOC content of each profile was fitted by the equal-area spline model, and it was possible to obtain the SOC content at all depths. Taking the 0–5 cm (L1), 5–10 cm (L2), and 10–15 cm (L3) sub-layers as examples, their SOC contents and stocks were compared to the mean values of the average 5-cm-thick sub-layers (Lm) derived from the value of the 0–15 cm layer. The results indicated that the SOC contents and stocks both reduced with increasing soil depths. The mean SOC contents of L1, L2, and L3 were 22.1, 21.0, and 18.7 g·kg −1 , respectively, with significant variation, and the values of L2 and L3 were 5.0% and 15.4% lower than that of L1. Similarly, the mean SOC stocks were 1.29, 1.25, and 1.16 kg·m −2 of the L1, L2, and L3 layers, also with significant variation, and the values of L2 and L3 were 4.0% and 10.1% lower than that of L1. Meanwhile, it was found that the SOC content and stock of Lm were both close to the corresponding values in L2, but were significantly different to that of L1 and L3. Furthermore, the interpolation contours of the SOC contents and stocks in L1, L2, and L3 by digital soil mapping also presented regular variation with increasing soil depths, while the contours of Lm had nearly identical patterns to that of L2. The results demonstrate that the typically used mean SOC contents with certain thicknesses calculated from the sampling layer can only approximately inflect the SOC situation at intermediate depths, but the SOC content in the upper and lower parts within the sampling layer varies greatly. Therefore, the actual distribution of SOC varies gradually depending on the soil depth. This study indicates that the combination of the equal-area spline model and digital soil mapping can greatly enrich the current soil SOC database and provide more abundant and accurate SOC content and stock information for precision agricultural and environmental management based on legacy soil database.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhongqi Zhang & Jingzhang Li & Chun-Chih Tsui & Zueng-Sang Chen, 2020. "The Study of Gaining More Detailed Variability Information of Soil Organic Carbon in Surface Soils and Its Significance to Enriching the Existing Soil Database," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:4866-:d:371593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/4866/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/4866/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tobias Rentschler & Philipp Gries & Thorsten Behrens & Helge Bruelheide & Peter Kühn & Steffen Seitz & Xuezheng Shi & Stefan Trogisch & Thomas Scholten & Karsten Schmidt, 2019. "Comparison of catchment scale 3D and 2.5D modelling of soil organic carbon stocks in Jiangxi Province, PR China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Dong, Xiaobin & Yang, Weikun & Ulgiati, Sergio & Yan, Maochao & Zhang, Xinshi, 2012. "The impact of human activities on natural capital and ecosystem services of natural pastures in North Xinjiang, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 28-39.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucy Semerjian & Kunle Okaiyeto & Mike O. Ojemaye & Temitope Cyrus Ekundayo & Aboi Igwaran & Anthony I. Okoh, 2021. "Global Systematic Mapping of Road Dust Research from 1906 to 2020: Research Gaps and Future Direction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Mellino, Salvatore & Ripa, Maddalena & Zucaro, Amalia & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2014. "An emergy–GIS approach to the evaluation of renewable resource flows: A case study of Campania Region, Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 271(C), pages 103-112.
    3. Jiang, Wei, 2017. "Ecosystem services research in China: A critical review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PA), pages 10-16.
    4. You, L. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Zhang, J.L., 2014. "Modeling regional ecosystem development under uncertainty – A case study for New Binhai District of Tianjin," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 288(C), pages 127-142.
    5. Song, Wei & Deng, Xiangzheng & Yuan, Yongwei & Wang, Zhan & Li, Zhaohua, 2015. "Impacts of land-use change on valued ecosystem service in rapidly urbanized North China Plain," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 245-253.
    6. Jian Zhang & Meixia Ren & Xin Lu & Yu Li & Jianjun Cao, 2022. "Effect of the Belt and Road Initiatives on Trade and Its Related LUCC and Ecosystem Services of Central Asian Nations," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    7. Fengjiao Ma & A. Egrinya Eneji & Jintong Liu, 2014. "Understanding Relationships among Agro-Ecosystem Services Based on Emergy Analysis in Luancheng County, North China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-20, November.
    8. Lee, Dong Joo & Brown, Mark T., 2021. "Estimating the Value of Global Ecosystem Structure and Productivity: A Geographic Information System and Emergy Based Approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 439(C).
    9. Lina Tang & Alimujiang Kasimu & Haitao Ma & Mamattursun Eziz, 2023. "Monitoring Multi-Scale Ecological Change and Its Potential Drivers in the Economic Zone of the Tianshan Mountains’ Northern Slopes, Xinjiang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Mariana Oliveira & Remo Santagata & Serena Kaiser & Yanxin Liu & Chiara Vassillo & Patrizia Ghisellini & Gengyuan Liu & Sergio Ulgiati, 2022. "Socioeconomic and Environmental Benefits of Expanding Urban Green Areas: A Joint Application of i-Tree and LCA Approaches," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, November.
    11. Oliveira, M. & Zucaro, A. & Santagata, R. & Ulgiati, S., 2022. "Environmental assessment of milk production from local to regional scales," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 463(C).
    12. Shoyama, Kikuko & Kamiyama, Chiho & Morimoto, Junko & Ooba, Makoto & Okuro, Toshiya, 2017. "A review of modeling approaches for ecosystem services assessment in the Asian region," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PB), pages 316-328.
    13. Ni, Jingneng & Xu, Jiuping & Zhang, Mengxiang, 2018. "Constructed wetland modelling for watershed ecosystem protection under a certain economic load: A case study at the Chaohu Lake watershed, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 180-190.
    14. Xu, Zihan & Wei, Hejie & Fan, Weiguo & Wang, Xuechao & Huang, Bingling & Lu, Nachuan & Ren, Jiahui & Dong, Xiaobin, 2018. "Energy modeling simulation of changes in ecosystem services before and after the implementation of a Grain-for-Green program on the Loess Plateau—A case study of the Zhifanggou valley in Ansai Count," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PA), pages 32-43.
    15. Sannigrahi, Srikanta, 2017. "Modeling terrestrial ecosystem productivity of an estuarine ecosystem in the Sundarban Biosphere Region, India using seven ecosystem models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 356(C), pages 73-90.
    16. Moran, C.J. & Franks, D.M. & Sonter, L.J., 2013. "Using the multiple capitals framework to connect indicators of regional cumulative impacts of mining and pastoralism in the Murray Darling Basin, Australia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 733-744.
    17. Sareh Hosseini & Jafar Oladi & Hamid Amirnejad, 2021. "The evaluation of environmental, economic and social services of national parks," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 9052-9075, June.
    18. Dong, X.B. & Yu, B.H. & Brown, M.T. & Zhang, Y.S. & Kang, M.Y. & Jin, Y. & Zhang, X.S. & Ulgiati, S., 2014. "Environmental and economic consequences of the overexploitation of natural capital and ecosystem services in Xilinguole League, China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 767-780.
    19. Oliveira, Mariana & Cocozza, Annalisa & Zucaro, Amalia & Santagata, Remo & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2021. "Circular economy in the agro-industry: Integrated environmental assessment of dairy products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    20. Fengjin Xiao & Qiufeng Liu & Yuqing Xu, 2022. "Estimation of Terrestrial Net Primary Productivity in the Yellow River Basin of China Using Light Use Efficiency Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:4866-:d:371593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.