IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i10p3992-d357646.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifier of Regional Food Presence (IRFP): A New Perspective to Evaluate Sustainable Menus

Author

Listed:
  • Verônica Cortez Ginani

    (Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Wilma Maria Coelho Araújo

    (Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Renata Puppin Zandonadi

    (Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Raquel B. Assunção Botelho

    (Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

Abstract

The menu offered in restaurants must meet different aspects of quality. Cultural elements are related to their acceptance and can contribute to the preservation of habits, sustainable agricultural systems, and the maintenance of biodiversity and sustainability, among other factors. In this context, this research proposes an instrument for classifying menus regarding the presence/absence of regional foods called the identifier of regional foods presence (IRFP) as a new perspective to evaluate sustainable menus. For this, lists of regional preparations and ingredients were prepared for each Brazilian region. Sequentially, we submitted the dishes/ingredients to a developed decision tree for the classification of foods into regional or national foods. The score, based on the presence/absence of regional foods, considered the components of a menu, with zero attributed to a lack of regional ingredients/dishes. For national dishes/ingredients, researchers attributed a minimum score equal to ten. One regional food gave a score of50 to the menu, and with more than one regional food, a daily menu scored 100. The final menu evaluation was based on the mean scores of the menus in each restaurant. Scores between 0–49.9 were considered inadequate; 50–74.9, adequate; and excellent between 75–100. The IRFP was applied to 111 menus with data collected from all the offered dishes. In total, the study evaluated data from 774 recipes from the menus of 37 restaurants located in the five Brazilian regions with a similar operating system. ANOVA was used to verify if there was a statistical difference between the mean score of each Brazilian region ( p < 0.05). The average score obtained by the IRFP in menus from Brazilian community restaurants was 80.3 ± 30.9 (excellent), showing a significant difference between the Northeast and Southeast Regions, with a more significant presence of regional foods in the Northeast (87.7 ± 28.7). The use of the IRFP in menus was shown to be easy in its application, contributing to a stimulation of the use of regional items and, consequently, to the direct and indirect benefits generated for the food system and the local population.

Suggested Citation

  • Verônica Cortez Ginani & Wilma Maria Coelho Araújo & Renata Puppin Zandonadi & Raquel B. Assunção Botelho, 2020. "Identifier of Regional Food Presence (IRFP): A New Perspective to Evaluate Sustainable Menus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:3992-:d:357646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/3992/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/3992/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:mpr:mprres:2894 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Dayanne da Costa Maynard & Mayara Daré Vidigal & Priscila Farage & Renata Puppin Zandonadi & Eduardo Yoshio Nakano & Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho, 2020. "Environmental, Social and Economic Sustainability Indicators Applied to Food Services: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Patricia Allen, 2010. "Realizing justice in local food systems," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 3(2), pages 295-308.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janice Ramos de Sousa & Rita de Cássia C.A. Akutsu & Renata Puppin Zandonadi & Raquel B. A. Botelho, 2020. "Breakfast Characterization and Consumption by Low-Income Brazilians: Food Identity and Regional Food," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Codruța Adina Băltescu & Nicoleta Andreea Neacșu & Anca Madar & Dana Boșcor & Alexandra Zamfirache, 2022. "Sustainable Development Practices of Restaurants in Romania and Changes during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Alessandra Cupertino & Veronica Ginani & Ana Paula Cupertino & Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho, 2022. "School Feeding Programs: What Happens Globally?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-12, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara A. L. Smaal & Joost Dessein & Barend J. Wind & Elke Rogge, 2021. "Social justice-oriented narratives in European urban food strategies: Bringing forward redistribution, recognition and representation," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(3), pages 709-727, September.
    2. Annelie Sieveking, 2019. "Food Policy Councils as Loci for Practising Food Democracy? Insights from the Case of Oldenburg, Germany," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 48-58.
    3. Alexandrine Lapoutte & Clara Lohier-Fanchini & Séverine Saleilles, 2017. "De l’aide à la justice alimentaire : Étude d’un partenariat entre Biocoop et des épiceries sociales et solidaires," Post-Print halshs-01660289, HAL.
    4. Nina Stępnicka & Grzegorz Zimon & Dariusz Brzozowiec, 2021. "The Complementary Currency Zielony in Poland and Its Importance for the Development of Local Economy Entities during the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    5. Omar Ouro-Salim & Patricia Guarnieri, 2025. "Sustainable food waste management: comparative study of NGO and restaurant practices in Brazil and Togo," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 106(1), pages 99-136, May.
    6. Joana Maria Sousa & Ana Catarina Teixeira & Margarida Liz Martins, 2025. "Assessment of Food Sustainability in School Canteens: Menu Quality and Environmental Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Chakori, Sabrina & Aziz, Ammar Abdul & Smith, Carl & Dargusch, Paul, 2021. "Untangling the underlying drivers of the use of single-use food packaging," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    8. Jeannette M. Blackmar, 2014. "Deliberative Democracy, Civic Engagement and Food Policy Councils," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(2), pages 43-57.
    9. Annelie Sieveking, 2019. "Food Policy Councils as Loci for Practising Food Democracy? Insights from the Case of Oldenburg, Germany," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 48-58.
    10. Rafael Ninno Muniz & Carlos Tavares da Costa Júnior & William Gouvêa Buratto & Ademir Nied & Gabriel Villarrubia González, 2023. "The Sustainability Concept: A Review Focusing on Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Kevin Morgan, 2015. "Nourishing the city: The rise of the urban food question in the Global North," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(8), pages 1379-1394, June.
    12. Giovana Vitória Nunes Leite Duarte & Susana Pereira Antunes Procópio & Angélica Cotta Lobo Leite Carneiro & Leandro de Morais Cardoso, 2022. "Development and Validation of a Tool for Assessing Sustainable Social Practices in Food Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Yuying Huang & C. Michael Hall, 2023. "Locality in the Promoted Sustainability Practices of Michelin-Starred Restaurants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    14. N.I. Pyzhikova & D.V. Parshukov & E.Yu. Vlasova & E.V. Pyhanova, 2018. "Monitoring and Forecasting the Development of Local Food Systems: A Case Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 362-377.
    15. Róbert Štefko & Petra Vašaničová & Sylvia Jenčová & Aneta Pachura, 2021. "Management and Economic Sustainability of the Slovak Industrial Companies with Medium Energy Intensity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, January.
    16. Esteve G. Giraud & Sara El-Sayed & Adenike Opejin, 2021. "Gardening for Food Well-Being in the COVID-19 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, August.
    17. Lea Loretta Zentgraf, 2025. "How Democratic Is Just Enough? Critical Reflections on the Transformative Potential of the Berlin Food Policy Council," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10.
    18. Joseph Kangmennaang & Rachel Bezner Kerr & Esther Lupafya & Laifolo Dakishoni & Mangani Katundu & Isaac Luginaah, 2017. "Impact of a participatory agroecological development project on household wealth and food security in Malawi," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(3), pages 561-576, June.
    19. Linda Lobao & Jeff Sharp, 2013. "Agriculture and rural development," Chapters, in: Gary Paul Green (ed.), Handbook of Rural Development, chapter 7, pages i-ii, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Alexandrine Lapoutte & Clara Lohier-Fanchini & Séverine Saleilles, 2020. "De l’aide à la justice alimentaire : Etude d’un partenariat entre Biocoop et des épiceries sociales et solidaires," Post-Print halshs-02556609, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:3992-:d:357646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.