IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i7p1889-d218164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Performance of UAS-Compatible Multispectral and Hyperspectral Sensors for Soil Organic Carbon Prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Giacomo Crucil

    (TECLIM, George Lemaitre Center for Earth and Climate, Earth and Life Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium)

  • Fabio Castaldi

    (TECLIM, George Lemaitre Center for Earth and Climate, Earth and Life Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium)

  • Emilien Aldana-Jague

    (TECLIM, George Lemaitre Center for Earth and Climate, Earth and Life Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium)

  • Bas van Wesemael

    (TECLIM, George Lemaitre Center for Earth and Climate, Earth and Life Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium)

  • Andy Macdonald

    (Sustainable Agriculture Sciences Department, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK)

  • Kristof Van Oost

    (TECLIM, George Lemaitre Center for Earth and Climate, Earth and Life Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium)

Abstract

Laboratory spectroscopy has proved its reliability for estimating soil organic carbon (SOC) by exploiting the relationship between electromagnetic radiation and key spectral features of organic carbon located in the VIS-NIR-SWIR (350–2500 nm) region. While this approach provides SOC estimates at specific sampling points, geo-statistical or interpolation techniques are required to infer continuous spatial information. UAS-based proximal or remote sensing has the potential to provide detailed and spatially explicit spectral sampling of the topsoil at the field or even watershed scale. However, the factors affecting the quality of spectral acquisition under outdoor conditions need to be considered. In this study, we investigate the capabilities of two portable hyperspectral sensors (STS-VIS and STS-NIR), and two small-form multispectral cameras with narrow bands in the VIS-NIR region (Parrot Sequoia and Mini-MCA6), to predict SOC content. We collected spectral data under both controlled laboratory and outdoor conditions, with the latter being affected by variable illumination and atmospheric conditions and sensor-sample distance. We also analysed the transferability of the prediction models between different measurement setups by aligning spectra acquired under different conditions (laboratory and outdoor) or by different instruments. Our results indicate that UAS-compatible small-form sensors can be used to reliably estimate SOC. The results show that: (i) the best performance for SOC estimation under outdoor conditions was obtained using the VIS-NIR range, while the addition of the SWIR region decreased the prediction accuracy; (ii) prediction models using only the narrow bands of multispectral cameras gave similar or better performances than those using continuous spectra from the STS hyperspectral sensors; and (iii) when used in outdoor conditions, the micro hyperspectral sensors substantially benefitted from a laboratory model calibration followed by a spectral transfer using an internal soil standard. Based on this analysis, we recommend VIS-NIR portable instruments for estimating spatially distributed SOC data. The integration of these sensors in UAS-mapping devices could represent a cost-effective solution for soil research and precision farming applications when high resolution data are required.

Suggested Citation

  • Giacomo Crucil & Fabio Castaldi & Emilien Aldana-Jague & Bas van Wesemael & Andy Macdonald & Kristof Van Oost, 2019. "Assessing the Performance of UAS-Compatible Multispectral and Hyperspectral Sensors for Soil Organic Carbon Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:1889-:d:218164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1889/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1889/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mevik, Björn-Helge & Wehrens, Ron, 2007. "The pls Package: Principal Component and Partial Least Squares Regression in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 18(i02).
    2. Antoine Stevens & Marco Nocita & Gergely Tóth & Luca Montanarella & Bas van Wesemael, 2013. "Prediction of Soil Organic Carbon at the European Scale by Visible and Near InfraRed Reflectance Spectroscopy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ana Andries & Stephen Morse & Richard J. Murphy & Jim Lynch & Bernardo Mota & Emma R. Woolliams, 2021. "Can Current Earth Observation Technologies Provide Useful Information on Soil Organic Carbon Stocks for Environmental Land Management Policy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-28, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Jianqing & Jiang, Bai & Sun, Qiang, 2022. "Bayesian factor-adjusted sparse regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 3-19.
    2. repec:jss:jstsof:23:i12 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Elton Mammadov & Michael Denk & Frank Riedel & Cezary Kaźmierowski & Karolina Lewinska & Remigiusz Łukowiak & Witold Grzebisz & Amrakh I. Mamedov & Cornelia Glaesser, 2022. "Determination of Mehlich 3 Extractable Elements with Visible and Near Infrared Spectroscopy in a Mountainous Agricultural Land, the Caucasus Mountains," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Jasiewicz Jarosław & Cierniewski Jerzy, 2021. "SALBEC – A Python Library and GUI Application to Calculate the Diurnal Variation of the Soil Albedo," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 40(3), pages 95-107, September.
    5. Alessandro Barbarino & Efstathia Bura, 2015. "Forecasting with Sufficient Dimension Reductions," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2015-74, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    6. Samuel Trachsel & Thanda Dhliwayo & Lorena Gonzalez Perez & Jose Alberto Mendoza Lugo & Mathias Trachsel, 2019. "Estimation of physiological genomic estimated breeding values (PGEBV) combining full hyperspectral and marker data across environments for grain yield under combined heat and drought stress in tropica," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Tomasz Rymarczyk & Krzysztof Król & Edward Kozłowski & Tomasz Wołowiec & Marta Cholewa-Wiktor & Piotr Bednarczuk, 2021. "Application of Electrical Tomography Imaging Using Machine Learning Methods for the Monitoring of Flood Embankments Leaks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-35, December.
    8. Natallia Pashkevich & Darek Haftor & Mikael Karlsson & Soumitra Chowdhury, 2019. "Sustainability through the Digitalization of Industrial Machines: Complementary Factors of Fuel Consumption and Productivity for Forklifts with Sensors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Hernandez-Villafuerte, Karla Vanessa, 2011. "Relationship Between Spatial Price Transmission And Geographical Distance In Brazil," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114545, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Nunes Matthew A & Balding David J, 2010. "On Optimal Selection of Summary Statistics for Approximate Bayesian Computation," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, September.
    11. Wehrens, Ron & Franceschi, Pietro, 2012. "Meta-Statistics for Variable Selection: The R Package BioMark," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 51(i10).
    12. Oladosu, Gbadebo A. & Leiby, Paul N. & Bowman, David C. & Uría-Martínez, Rocio & Johnson, Megan M., 2018. "Impacts of oil price shocks on the United States economy: A meta-analysis of the oil price elasticity of GDP for net oil-importing economies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 523-544.
    13. Tao Liu & Huan Zhang & Tiezhu Shi, 2020. "Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Soil Organic Carbon Density in a Small-Scale Area Using Geographically Weighted Regression Kriging Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-12, November.
    14. Zhao, Ting & Yang, Zhenshan, 2017. "Towards green growth and management: Relative efficiency and gaps of Chinese cities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 481-494.
    15. Miles Grafton & Therese Kaul & Alan Palmer & Peter Bishop & Michael White, 2019. "Technical Note: Regression Analysis of Proximal Hyperspectral Data to Predict Soil pH and Olsen P," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Tanin Sirimongkolkasem & Reza Drikvandi, 2019. "On Regularisation Methods for Analysis of High Dimensional Data," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 737-763, December.
    17. Radim VAŠÁT & Radka KODEŠOVÁ & Aleš KLEMENT & Ondřej JAKŠÍK, 2015. "Predicting oxidizable carbon content via visible- and near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy in soils heavily affected by water erosion," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 74-77.
    18. Carolina Olid & Valentí Rodellas & Gerard Rocher-Ros & Jordi Garcia-Orellana & Marc Diego-Feliu & Aaron Alorda-Kleinglass & David Bastviken & Jan Karlsson, 2022. "Groundwater discharge as a driver of methane emissions from Arctic lakes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    19. Fitzpatrick, Trevor & Mues, Christophe, 2021. "How can lenders prosper? Comparing machine learning approaches to identify profitable peer-to-peer loan investments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 711-722.
    20. Alamgir Kabir & Md Jahanur Rahman & Abu Ahmed Shamim & Rolf D W Klemm & Alain B Labrique & Mahbubur Rashid & Parul Christian & Keith P West Jr., 2017. "Identifying maternal and infant factors associated with newborn size in rural Bangladesh by partial least squares (PLS) regression analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, December.
    21. Shianghau Wu & Jiannjong Guo, 2018. "PLS and OPLS Discriminatory Analyses on Political Sustainability in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:1889-:d:218164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.