IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i24p7087-d296538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protected Areas, Tourism, and Rural Transition in Aysén, Chile

Author

Listed:
  • Heidi Blair

    (Department of Society and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA)

  • Keith Bosak

    (Department of Society and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA)

  • Trace Gale

    (Department of Society and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA
    Department of Sustainable Tourism, Center for Patagonia Ecosystem Investigation, Coyhaique 5951369, Chile)

Abstract

Following global trends, nature-based tourism in the Aysén region of Chilean Patagonia has grown dramatically in recent years. This growth has challenged traditional economic activities derived from commodification of natural resources, including ranching, logging, and mining. A qualitative research study conducted in 2016–2017 used semi-structured interviews and focus groups to investigate how local residents perceived the changes that accompany rural development around the nationally protected area of Cerro Castillo, projected to be one of the region’s protected areas that will drive economic development through tourism in coming decades. Results identified several themes reminiscent of the rural transition that took place in the western United States in the mid to late-1900s. During this era, the remote, rugged, wild frontier lands of the sparsely populated intermountain west shifted from an economy grounded in extractive industries to a service-based one, geared towards amenity migrants and tourists seeking recreation opportunities and closeness to nature. Patterns and lessons are drawn between similar transitions across geographies and timescales, which may assist planners with understandings of trends and tendencies as tourism continues to influence rural transition in Patagonia.

Suggested Citation

  • Heidi Blair & Keith Bosak & Trace Gale, 2019. "Protected Areas, Tourism, and Rural Transition in Aysén, Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-22, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7087-:d:296538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7087/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7087/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Butler, 2018. "Sustainable Tourism in Sensitive Environments: A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-11, May.
    2. Andrew Balmford & Jonathan M H Green & Michael Anderson & James Beresford & Charles Huang & Robin Naidoo & Matt Walpole & Andrea Manica, 2015. "Walk on the Wild Side: Estimating the Global Magnitude of Visits to Protected Areas," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-6, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tawfik, Rady & Sarhan, Mahmoud, 2021. "Ecotourism And Protected Areas Sustainable Financing: A Case Study Of Wadi El Gemal Visitor Center," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 9(2), pages 156-172.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adam Burke, 2021. "The Crossroads of Ecotourism Dependency, Food Security and a Global Pandemic in Galápagos, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Radisti A. Praptiwi & Carya Maharja & Matt Fortnam & Tomas Chaigneau & Louisa Evans & Leuserina Garniati & Jito Sugardjito, 2021. "Tourism-Based Alternative Livelihoods for Small Island Communities Transitioning towards a Blue Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Min Gon Chung & Tao Pan & Xintong Zou & Jianguo Liu, 2018. "Complex Interrelationships between Ecosystem Services Supply and Tourism Demand: General Framework and Evidence from the Origin of Three Asian Rivers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Thomas Dax & Oliver Tamme, 2023. "Attractive Landscape Features as Drivers for Sustainable Mountain Tourism Experiences," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Yingying Qiu & Dan He & Zhe Xu & Xiaoliang Shi, 2023. "The Role of the Forest Recreation Industry in China’s National Economy: An Input–Output Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, June.
    6. Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Thomas E. Jones, 2022. "Building eco-surplus culture among urban residents as a novel strategy to improve finance for conservation in protected areas," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Ahmad Salman & Mastura Jaafar & Diana Mohamad & Mana Khoshkam, 2023. "Understanding Multi-stakeholder Complexity & Developing a Causal Recipe (fsQCA) for achieving Sustainable Ecotourism," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 10261-10284, September.
    8. Agnieszka Niezgoda & Marek Nowacki, 2020. "Experiencing Nature: Physical Activity, Beauty and Tension in Tatra National Park—Analysis of TripAdvisor Reviews," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Sébastien Boillat & Jean-David Gerber & Christoph Oberlack & Julie G. Zaehringer & Chinwe Ifejika Speranza & Stephan Rist, 2018. "Distant Interactions, Power, and Environmental Justice in Protected Area Governance: A Telecoupling Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-30, October.
    10. Sinclair, Michael & Ghermandi, Andrea & Signorello, Giovanni & Giuffrida, Laura & De Salvo, Maria, 2022. "Valuing Recreation in Italy's Protected Areas Using Spatial Big Data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    11. Adam R. Szromek & Zygmunt Kruczek & Bartłomiej Walas, 2019. "The Attitude of Tourist Destination Residents towards the Effects of Overtourism—Kraków Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Tafesse Estifanos & Maksym Polyakov & Ram Pandit & Atakelty Hailu & Michael Burton, 2021. "What are tourists willing to pay for securing the survival of a flagship species? The case of protection of the Ethiopian wolf," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(1), pages 45-69, February.
    13. Li, Yi & Song, Zhenjiang, 2022. "Have protected areas in China achieved the ecological and economic “win-win” goals? Evidence from the Giant Panda Reserves of the Min Mont Range," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    14. Andrés Vargas Pérez & David Díaz Florián & Tatiana Cantillo, 2020. "Preferences of Prospective Visitors for Nature-Based Recreational Activities in the Salamanca Island Protected Area, Colombia," Documentos Departamento de Economía 18415, Universidad del Norte.
    15. Arnberger, Arne & Eder, Renate & Allex, Brigitte & Preisel, Hemma & Ebenberger, Martin & Husslein, Maria, 2018. "Trade-offs between wind energy, recreational, and bark-beetle impacts on visual preferences of national park visitors," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 166-177.
    16. Lishan Xu & Changlin Ao & Baoqi Liu & Zhenyu Cai, 2023. "Ecotourism and sustainable development: a scientometric review of global research trends," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 2977-3003, April.
    17. Arnberger Arne & Eder Renate & Preisel Hemma, 2016. "Tagestourismus oder Wohnumfeldnutzung?," Zeitschrift für Tourismuswissenschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 199-221, November.
    18. Roux, Dirk J. & Smith, M. Kyle S. & Smit, Izak P.J. & Freitag, Stefanie & Slabbert, Liandi & Mokhatla, Mohlamatsane M. & Hayes, Jessica & Mpapane, Nelsiwe P., 2020. "Cultural ecosystem services as complex outcomes of people–nature interactions in protected areas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    19. Ciesielski, Mariusz & Stereńczak, Krzysztof, 2021. "Using Flickr data and selected environmental characteristics to analyse the temporal and spatial distribution of activities in forest areas," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    20. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2020. "Evaluation of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets: The international collaboration trilemma in interdisciplinary research," OSF Preprints 84j76, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7087-:d:296538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.