IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i23p6786-d292410.html

Spatial Access to Medical Services in the Underdeveloped Region of Northwestern China: A Case Study in Lanzhou City

Author

Listed:
  • Wantong Xu

    (College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Fuguang Zhang

    (College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Biao Zeng

    (College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Taibao Yang

    (College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Hui Wang

    (College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

Abstract

Research on the spatial access to medical services has become a hot topic in recent years. The representative provincial capital in the underdeveloped region of northwestern China, Lanzhou, was selected for the research area. In this paper, methods such as the two-step floating catchment area and ArcGIS network analysis are used to analyze the geographic spatial accessibility of medical services and differences of spatial access between urban and rural areas in Lanzhou city. The results show that 1. Areas in General and below grade of accessibility account for most of Lanzhou city. Therefore, the spatial accessibility of whole Lanzhou city is comparatively unsatisfactory. It shows a tendency of the north region to be worse than south region, and areas in parts of the main districts, parts of HG, and other tiny minority show Great grade of accessibility, and most of other areas distribute in poorer grade of accessibility, especially the surrounding mountainous region. 2. There are obvious differences in accessibility between urban and rural regions, mainly reflected in that residents and areas are basically districted in the Great and Good grade in the urban region, while almost 75% of the population and 35% of the areas are distributed in the Great and Good grade, and nearly 25% of the residents and 65% of the areas are still in the unsatisfactory accessibility grade in the rural region. According to the results, the researchers put forward corresponding suggestions to improve the current situation, which are roughly as follows: The construction of hospitals and primary health care should be strengthened in the rural region, especially the construction of township health centers and health stations. High-class hospitals are needed in Honggu district, Yongdeng county, Yuzhong county, and Gaolan county, while the medical capacity and facility grade of existing hospitals should be improved to satisfy the demand of local residents. Meanwhile, rural areas should strengthen the construction of road networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Wantong Xu & Fuguang Zhang & Biao Zeng & Taibao Yang & Hui Wang, 2019. "Spatial Access to Medical Services in the Underdeveloped Region of Northwestern China: A Case Study in Lanzhou City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6786-:d:292410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6786/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6786/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Luo & Fahui Wang, 2003. "Measures of Spatial Accessibility to Health Care in a GIS Environment: Synthesis and a Case Study in the Chicago Region," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 30(6), pages 865-884, December.
    2. Wang, Xiuli & Yang, Huazhen & Duan, Zhanqi & Pan, Jay, 2018. "Spatial accessibility of primary health care in China: A case study in Sichuan Province," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 14-24.
    3. Khan, Abdullah A., 1992. "An integrated approach to measuring potential spatial access to health care services," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 275-287, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qidi Dong & Heng Lu & Xiaohong Luo & Pengman He & Di Li & Linjia Wu & Yundi Wei & Xuli Chen, 2023. "Evaluation and Optimization of Green Space Fairness in Urban Built-Up Areas Based on an Improved Supply and Demand Model: A Case Study of Chengdu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:socarx:s78xa_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Chen, Wendong & Cheng, Long & Chen, Xuewu & Chen, Jingxu & Cao, Mengqiu, 2021. "Measuring accessibility to health care services for older bus passengers: A finer spatial resolution," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    3. Wang, Jianying & Dong, Lei & Cheng, Ximeng & Yang, Weijun & Liu, Yu, 2019. "An extended exploration and preferential return model for human mobility simulation at individual and collective levels," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    4. Fahui Wang & Quan Tang, 2013. "Planning toward Equal Accessibility to Services: A Quadratic Programming Approach," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(2), pages 195-212, April.
    5. Lei Mu & Lijun Xing & Ying Jing & Qinjiang Hu, 2023. "Spatial Optimization of Park Green Spaces by an Improved Two-Step Optimization Model from the Perspective of Maximizing Accessibility Equity," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Xiuli Wang & Barnabas C. Seyler & Ting Chen & Weiyan Jian & Hongqiao Fu & Baofeng Di & Winnie Yip & Jay Pan, 2024. "Disparity in healthcare seeking behaviors between impoverished and non-impoverished populations with implications for healthcare resource optimization," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Ma, Yuanyuan & Zheng, Wenyuan & Huang, Zhiyong, 2025. "Navigating healthcare for older adults after a chronic illness diagnosis: Evidence from China," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    8. Jiahui Qin & Shijia Luo & Disheng Yi & Heping Jiang & Jing Zhang, 2022. "Measuring Cluster-Based Spatial Access to Shopping Stores under Real-Time Travel Time," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Xiaoxiao Liu & Judy E. Seidel & Terrence McDonald & Alka B. Patel & Nigel Waters & Stefania Bertazzon & Rizwan Shahid & Deborah A. Marshall, 2022. "Rural–Urban Disparities in Realized Spatial Access to General Practitioners, Orthopedic Surgeons, and Physiotherapists among People with Osteoarthritis in Alberta, Canada," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-20, June.
    10. Neutens, Tijs, 2015. "Accessibility, equity and health care: review and research directions for transport geographers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 14-27.
    11. Matthew Tuson & Berwin Turlach & Kevin Murray & Mei Ruu Kok & Alistair Vickery & David Whyatt, 2021. "Predicting Future Geographic Hotspots of Potentially Preventable Hospitalisations Using All Subset Model Selection and Repeated K-Fold Cross-Validation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-21, September.
    12. Voicu, Bogdan & Fărcășanu, Dana & Mustață, Mirela & Deliu, Alexandra & Vișinescu, Iulia, 2023. "Using laws, common sense, and statistical approaches to design indicators for ‘medical desertification’. An application on the Romanian case," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    13. Danny van Steijn & Juan José Pons Izquierdo & Eduardo Garralda Domezain & Miguel Antonio Sánchez-Cárdenas & Carlos Centeno Cortés, 2021. "Population’s Potential Accessibility to Specialized Palliative Care Services: A Comparative Study in Three European Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-14, September.
    14. Jia, Peng & Wang, Youfa & Yang, Min & Wang, Limin & Yang, Xuchao & Shi, Xinyu & Yang, Lijian & Wen, Jin & Liu, Yi & Yang, Maokang & Xin, Junguo & Zhang, Fengying & Jiang, Lihua & Chi, Chunhua & Zhang,, 2022. "Inequalities of spatial primary healthcare accessibility in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    15. Yu, Dongwei & Tan, Hongwei & Ruan, Yingjun, 2012. "An improved two-step floating catchment area method for supporting district building energy planning: A case study of Yongding County city, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 156-163.
    16. Liu, Yun & Kong, Qingxia & de Bekker-Grob, Esther W., 2019. "Public preferences for health care facilities in rural China: A discrete choice experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Wei Luo & Fahui Wang, 2003. "Measures of Spatial Accessibility to Health Care in a GIS Environment: Synthesis and a Case Study in the Chicago Region," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 30(6), pages 865-884, December.
    18. Zhuolin Tao & Qi Wang, 2022. "Facility or Transport Inequality? Decomposing Healthcare Accessibility Inequality in Shenzhen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-14, June.
    19. Zongpeng Xu & Fuyu Ban & Pasquale Fotia, 2026. "Efficient QoS processing for internet of medical things using non-cooperative game theory: resource allocation in cloud framework," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 356(1), pages 427-442, January.
    20. Jingyuan Chen & Yuqi Bai & Pei Zhang & Jingyuan Qiu & Yichun Hu & Tianhao Wang & Chengzhong Xu & Peng Gong, 2019. "A Spatial Distribution Equilibrium Evaluation of Health Service Resources at Community Grid Scale in Yichang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-28, December.
    21. Meijie Chen & Yumin Chen & Xiaoguang Wang & Huangyuan Tan & Fenglan Luo, 2019. "Spatial Difference of Transit-Based Accessibility to Hospitals by Regions Using Spatially Adjusted ANOVA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6786-:d:292410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.