IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i19p5469-d273013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of the Effectiveness of Using Renewable Resource Management-Based Simulations in the Development of Critical Thinking: An Application of the Experiential Learning Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Ana C. Urquidi-Martín

    (Accounting Department, School of Economics, Universitat de València, Avda. dels Tarongers, s/n, 46071 Valencia, Spain)

  • Carmen Tamarit-Aznar

    (Accounting Department, School of Economics, Universitat de València, Avda. dels Tarongers, s/n, 46071 Valencia, Spain)

  • Javier Sánchez-García

    (Department of Business Administration and Marketing, Universitat Jaume I, Campus Riu Sec, 12071 Castelló de la Plana, Spain)

Abstract

The twenty-first century’s society experiences new challenges in being immersed in a new paradigm of the educational system. Higher education institutions should train professionals so that they are able to experience real situations in order to encourage reflection on affective, aesthetic, and ethical dimensions of these people in their relations with the natural and sociocultural environment. Learning strategies must allow the acquisition of creative, active, and applied knowledge as well as the development of critical thinking. According to the experiential learning theory, to achieve this, higher education should use student-centered interactive and collaborative teaching methodologies and focus studies on the skills that graduates must have, promoting student know-how, initiative, and autonomous learning. Business simulations are instruments that fulfil the above characteristics, facilitating learning. The objective of this research was to provide a model that identifies the determining factors (simulation’s realism and structure, perceived usefulness, and students’ learning motivation) in the effectiveness of using these tools to develop critical thinking focused on sustainability. Three hundred and twenty-six surveys completed by undergraduate students were obtained, which used a structural equation model (SEM) to analyze the influence of realism, simulation structure, perceived usefulness, and students’ motivations to develop critical thinking. The outcomes according to the experiential learning theory showed that the game’s realism lets students perceive its usefulness and, together with an adequate simulation structure, determines the students’ learning motivations by developing critical thinking.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana C. Urquidi-Martín & Carmen Tamarit-Aznar & Javier Sánchez-García, 2019. "Determinants of the Effectiveness of Using Renewable Resource Management-Based Simulations in the Development of Critical Thinking: An Application of the Experiential Learning Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5469-:d:273013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5469/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5469/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bankole Osita Awuzie & Amal Abuzeinab, 2019. "Modelling Organisational Factors Influencing Sustainable Development Implementation Performance in Higher Education Institutions: An Interpretative Structural Modelling (ISM) Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Yves Levant & Michel Coulmont & Raluca Sandu, 2016. "Business simulation as an active learning activity for developing soft skills," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 368-395, July.
    3. Thomas Farrenkopf & Michael Guckert & Neil Urquhart & Simon Wells, 2016. "Ontology Based Business Simulations," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14.
    4. Rivero-Menéndez, M. José & Urquía-Grande, Elena & López-Sánchez, Pilar & Camacho-Miñano, M. Mar, 2018. "Motivation and learning strategies in accounting: Are there differences in English as a medium of instruction (EMI) versus non-EMI students?," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 128-139.
    5. Fernando Arellano & Susan Hine & Dawn D. Thilmany, 2001. "Using MANECSIM as a Simulation for Agribusiness Capstone Courses," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 23(1), pages 275-285.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amila Omazic & Bernd Markus Zunk, 2021. "Semi-Systematic Literature Review on Sustainability and Sustainable Development in Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-45, July.
    2. Pablo Aránguiz & Guillermo Palau-Salvador & Ana Belda & Jordi Peris, 2020. "Critical Thinking Using Project-Based Learning: The Case of The Agroecological Market at the “Universitat Politècnica de València”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Maria-Mar Fernandez-Antolin & José-Manuel del-Río & Fernando del Ama Gonzalo & Roberto-Alonso Gonzalez-Lezcano, 2020. "The Relationship between the Use of Building Performance Simulation Tools by Recent Graduate Architects and the Deficiencies in Architectural Education," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Lorenz Probst, 2022. "Higher Education for Sustainability: A Critical Review of the Empirical Evidence 2013–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Karina Cecilia Arredondo-Soto & Jean Paul Serrano-Manrrique & Julio Blanco-Fernandez & Guadalupe Hernández-Escobedo & Marco Augusto Miranda-Ackerman & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz, 2020. "Modeling of the Factors of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) Influencing the Strategic Linking Decisions with the Industrial Sector: Whole-Institution Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Corina-Ionela Dumitrescu & Georgiana Moiceanu & Razvan-Mihai Dobrescu & Mirona Ana Maria Popescu, 2022. "Analysis of UNESCO ESD Priority Areas’ Implementation in Romanian HEIs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Sarah Cheah & Shiyu Li, 2020. "The Effect of Structured Feedback on Performance: the Role of Attitude and Perceived Usefulness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicola Andreij Rieg & Birgitta Gatersleben & Ian Christie, 2021. "Organizational Change Management for Sustainability in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Quantitative Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Cristina Robledo-Ardila & Juan Pablo Román-Calderón, 2022. "Potential: in search for meaning, theory and avenues for future research a systematic review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 149-186, February.
    3. Popp, Jennie S. Hughes, 2002. "Impacts Of University Financial And Academic Support On Student Performance At The Ss-Aaea Quizbowl Competition And In The Classroom," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19836, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Ismaila Rimi Abubakar & Yusuf A. Aina & Habib M. Alshuwaikhat, 2020. "Sustainable Development at Saudi Arabian Universities: An Overview of Institutional Frameworks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Mara Bauer & Sebastian Niedlich & Marco Rieckmann & Inka Bormann & Larissa Jaeger, 2020. "Interdependencies of Culture and Functions of Sustainability Governance at Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Saadullah, Shahriar M. & Elsayed, Nader, 2020. "An audit simulation of the substantive procedures in the revenue process – A teaching case incorporating Bloom’s taxonomy," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    7. María del Carmen Olmos-Gómez & Mónica Luque-Suárez & Concetta Ferrara & Jesús Manuel Cuevas-Rincón, 2020. "Analysis of Psychometric Properties of the Quality and Satisfaction Questionnaire Focused on Sustainability in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Daniel Lovin & Monica Raducan & Alexandru Capatina & Nicoleta Cristache, 2021. "Sustainable Knowledge Transfer from Business Simulations to Working Environments: Correlational vs. Configurational Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E., 2017. "Accounting education literature review (2016)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1-31.
    10. Nathaniel S. Wright & Tony G. Reames, 2020. "Unraveling the Links between Organizational Factors and Perceptions of Community Sustainability Performance: An Empirical Investigation of Community-Based Nongovernmental Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Rodrigo Macaraig Velasco, 2019. "Factors Associated with Failure in Accounting: A Case Study of the Omani Students," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(6), pages 157-157, December.
    12. Sugahara, Satoshi & Cilloni, Andrea, 2021. "Mediation effect of students’ perception of accounting on the relationship between game-based learning and learning approaches," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    13. Elisabeth Sinnewe & Daifei (Troy) Yao & Laura De Zwaan, 2023. "Developing critical thinking: An examination of contemporary practices in accounting," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(1), pages 403-425, March.
    14. Popp, Jennie S. Hughes & Rodriguez, German, 2006. "Quizbowl: Success In and Out of the Classroom, a Five Year Study," 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida 35395, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    15. Popp, Jennie S. Hughes, 2004. "The Ss-Aaea Quizbowl: Success In And Out Of The Classroom A Three Year Study," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20119, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Amila Omazic & Bernd Markus Zunk, 2021. "Semi-Systematic Literature Review on Sustainability and Sustainable Development in Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-45, July.
    17. Chioma Sylvia Okoro, 2023. "Sustainable Facilities Management in the Built Environment: A Mixed-Method Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    18. Wolcott, Susan K. & Sargent, Matthew J., 2021. "Critical thinking in accounting education: Status and call to action," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    19. Karina Cecilia Arredondo-Soto & Jean Paul Serrano-Manrrique & Julio Blanco-Fernandez & Guadalupe Hernández-Escobedo & Marco Augusto Miranda-Ackerman & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz, 2020. "Modeling of the Factors of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) Influencing the Strategic Linking Decisions with the Industrial Sector: Whole-Institution Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    20. Jacob Peng & Ira Abdullah, 2018. "Building a market simulation to teach business process analysis: effects of realism on engaged learning," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 208-222, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5469-:d:273013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.