IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i18p5011-d266910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do We Know Enough to Save European Riverine Fish?—A Systematic Review on Autecological Requirements During Critical Life Stages of 10 Rheophilic Species at Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Nicole Smialek

    (Aquatic Systems Biology Unit, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Technical University Munich, Freising 85354, Germany)

  • Joachim Pander

    (Aquatic Systems Biology Unit, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Technical University Munich, Freising 85354, Germany)

  • Melanie Mueller

    (Aquatic Systems Biology Unit, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Technical University Munich, Freising 85354, Germany)

  • Ruben van Treeck

    (Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin 12587, Germany)

  • Christian Wolter

    (Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin 12587, Germany)

  • Juergen Geist

    (Aquatic Systems Biology Unit, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Technical University Munich, Freising 85354, Germany)

Abstract

Modeling of fish population developments in the context of hydropower impacts and restoration planning requires autecological information on critical life stages (especially on juvenile stages and reproduction). We compiled and examined the current data availability in peer-reviewed and grey literature on autecological requirements of ten rheophilic fish species at risk, belonging to the salmonid, cyprinid, and cottid families. In total, 1725 data points from 223 sources were included. Economically important salmonids and the common nase were the most studied species. Grey and peer-reviewed data showed similar dispersion and variance and contributed nearly equally to the data pool of the specific species. An in-depth analysis on seven ecological parameters revealed no significant differences between both sources in terms of data availability and quality. We found substantial deficits in the data for about a quarter of the reviewed ecological parameters, in particular on individual densities in the habitats, egg development and information about juvenile stages despite the necessity of such data for more advanced population analyses. To secure fish populations in the long term, more data on basic autecological parameters is needed and grey literature might add valuable information, particularly if it relies on standardized methodologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicole Smialek & Joachim Pander & Melanie Mueller & Ruben van Treeck & Christian Wolter & Juergen Geist, 2019. "Do We Know Enough to Save European Riverine Fish?—A Systematic Review on Autecological Requirements During Critical Life Stages of 10 Rheophilic Species at Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:5011-:d:266910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/5011/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/5011/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fletcher, W.J. & Shaw, J. & Metcalf, S.J. & Gaughan, D.J., 2010. "An Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management framework: the efficient, regional-level planning tool for management agencies," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1226-1238, November.
    2. Wickham, Hadley, 2011. "The Split-Apply-Combine Strategy for Data Analysis," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 40(i01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dolejš Martin & Forejt Michal, 2019. "Franziscean cadastre in landscape structure research: a systematic review," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 38(1), pages 131-144, March.
    2. Brias, Antoine & Munch, Stephan B., 2021. "Ecosystem based multi-species management using Empirical Dynamic Programming," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 441(C).
    3. Ravic Nijbroek & Kristin Piikki & Mats Söderström & Bas Kempen & Katrine G. Turner & Simeon Hengari & John Mutua, 2018. "Soil Organic Carbon Baselines for Land Degradation Neutrality: Map Accuracy and Cost Tradeoffs with Respect to Complexity in Otjozondjupa, Namibia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Merl, Robert & Stöckl, Thomas & Palan, Stefan, 2023. "Insider trading regulation and shorting constraints. Evaluating the joint effects of two market interventions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    5. Miller, Christine M.F. & Waterhouse, Hannah & Harter, Thomas & Fadel, James G. & Meyer, Deanne, 2020. "Quantifying the uncertainty in nitrogen application and groundwater nitrate leaching in manure based cropping systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    6. Sarlas, Georgios & Páez, Antonio & Axhausen, Kay W., 2020. "Betweenness-accessibility: Estimating impacts of accessibility on networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    7. Marin FOTACHE & Florin DUMITRU & Valerica GREAVU-SERBAN, 2015. "An Information Systems Master Programme in Romania. Some Commonalities and Specificities," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(3), pages 5-18.
    8. Martijn Van Heel & Dinska Van Gucht & Koen Vanbrabant & Frank Baeyens, 2017. "The Importance of Conditioned Stimuli in Cigarette and E-Cigarette Craving Reduction by E-Cigarettes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Sean McKenzie & Hilary Parkinson & Jane Mangold & Mary Burrows & Selena Ahmed & Fabian Menalled, 2018. "Perceptions, Experiences, and Priorities Supporting Agroecosystem Management Decisions Differ among Agricultural Producers, Consultants, and Researchers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Milad Abbasiharofteh & Tom Broekel, 2021. "Still in the shadow of the wall? The case of the Berlin biotechnology cluster," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(1), pages 73-94, February.
    11. Andee J. Kaplan & Eric R. Hare, 2019. "Putting down roots: a graphical exploration of community attachment," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1449-1464, December.
    12. Ahmad Alsaber & Jiazhu Pan & Adeeba Al-Herz & Dhary S. Alkandary & Adeeba Al-Hurban & Parul Setiya & on behalf of the KRRD Group, 2020. "Influence of Ambient Air Pollution on Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Score Index," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Kane, Michael & Emerson, John W. & Weston, Stephen, 2013. "Scalable Strategies for Computing with Massive Data," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 55(i14).
    14. Haunschild, Robin & Bornmann, Lutz, 2023. "Which papers cited which tweets? An exploratory analysis based on Scopus data," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).
    15. Fulya Gokalp Yavuz & Barret Schloerke, 2020. "Parallel computing in linear mixed models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 1273-1289, September.
    16. Rebecca Hong & Monica Perkins & Belinda J. Gabbe & Lincoln M. Tracy, 2022. "Comparing Peak Burn Injury Times and Characteristics in Australia and New Zealand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-9, August.
    17. Ioannis Politis & Ioannis Fyrogenis & Efthymis Papadopoulos & Anastasia Nikolaidou & Eleni Verani, 2020. "Shifting to Shared Wheels: Factors Affecting Dockless Bike-Sharing Choice for Short and Long Trips," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-25, October.
    18. Hooper, Tara & Austen, Melanie, 2013. "Tidal barrages in the UK: Ecological and social impacts, potential mitigation, and tools to support barrage planning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 289-298.
    19. Paul J McMurdie & Susan Holmes, 2014. "Waste Not, Want Not: Why Rarefying Microbiome Data Is Inadmissible," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.
    20. Debanjan Mukherjee & Ângelo Ferreira Chora & Jean-Christophe Lone & Ricardo S. Ramiro & Birte Blankenhaus & Karine Serre & Mário Ramirez & Isabel Gordo & Marc Veldhoen & Patrick Varga-Weisz & Maria M., 2022. "Host lung microbiota promotes malaria-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:5011-:d:266910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.