IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i10p2829-d232211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Day-Ahead Scheduling Model of the Distributed Small Hydro-Wind-Energy Storage Power System Based on Two-Stage Stochastic Robust Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Dong

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Peiwen Yang

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Shilin Nie

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

With renewable energy sources (RESs) highly penetrating into the power system, new problems emerge for the independent system operator (ISO) to maintain and keep the power system safe and reliable in the day-ahead dispatching process under the fluctuation caused by renewable energy. In this paper, considering the small hydropower with no reservoir, different from the other hydro optimization research and wind power uncertain circumstances, a day-ahead scheduling model is proposed for a distributed power grid system which contains several distributed generators, such as small hydropower and wind power, and energy storage systems. To solve this model, a two-stage stochastic robust optimization approach is presented to smooth out hydro power and wind power output fluctuation with the aim of minimizing the total expected system operation cost under multiple cluster water inflow scenarios, and the worst case of wind power output uncertainty. More specifically, before dispatching and clearing, it is necessary to cluster the historical inflow scenarios of small hydropower into several typical scenarios via the Fuzzy C-means (FCM) clustering method, and then the clustering comprehensive quality (CCQ) method is also presented to evaluate whether these scenarios are representative, which has previously been ignored by cluster research. It can be found through numerical examples that FCM-CCQ can explain the classification more reasonably than the common clustering method. Then we optimize the two stage scheduling, which contain the pre-clearing stage and the rescheduling stage under each typical inflow scenario after clustering, and then calculate the final operating cost under the worst wind power output scenario. To conduct the proposed model, the day-ahead scheduling procedure on the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 30-bus test system is simulated with real hydropower and wind power data. Compared with traditional deterministic optimization, the results of two-stage stochastic robust optimization structured in this paper, increases the total cost of the system, but enhances the conservative scheduling strategy, improves the stability and reliability of the power system, and reduces the risk of decision-making simultaneously.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Dong & Peiwen Yang & Shilin Nie, 2019. "Day-Ahead Scheduling Model of the Distributed Small Hydro-Wind-Energy Storage Power System Based on Two-Stage Stochastic Robust Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:2829-:d:232211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2829/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2829/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mitali Sarkar & Biswajit Sarkar & Muhammad Waqas Iqbal, 2018. "Effect of Energy and Failure Rate in a Multi-Item Smart Production System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Huiru Zhao & Yuwei Wang & Mingrui Zhao & Qingkun Tan & Sen Guo, 2017. "Day-Ahead Market Modeling for Strategic Wind Power Producers under Robust Market Clearing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-27, July.
    3. Sichilalu, Sam & Wamalwa, Fhazhil & Akinlabi, Esther T., 2019. "Optimal control of wind-hydrokinetic pumpback hydropower plant constrained with ecological water flows," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 54-69.
    4. Shams, Mohammad H. & Shahabi, Majid & Khodayar, Mohammad E., 2018. "Stochastic day-ahead scheduling of multiple energy Carrier microgrids with demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 326-338.
    5. Seme, Sebastijan & Sredenšek, Klemen & Praunseis, Zdravko & Štumberger, Bojan & Hadžiselimović, Miralem, 2018. "Optimal price of electricity of solar power plants and small hydro power plants – Technical and economical part of investments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 87-95.
    6. de Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo, 2016. "Stochastic hydro-thermal scheduling optimization: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 382-395.
    7. Chen, J.J. & Zhuang, Y.B. & Li, Y.Z. & Wang, P. & Zhao, Y.L. & Zhang, C.S., 2017. "Risk-aware short term hydro-wind-thermal scheduling using a probability interval optimization model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 534-554.
    8. Chen, Yue & Wei, Wei & Liu, Feng & Mei, Shengwei, 2016. "Distributionally robust hydro-thermal-wind economic dispatch," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 511-519.
    9. Wang, Dongxiao & Qiu, Jing & Reedman, Luke & Meng, Ke & Lai, Loi Lei, 2018. "Two-stage energy management for networked microgrids with high renewable penetration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 39-48.
    10. Paish, Oliver, 2002. "Small hydro power: technology and current status," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 6(6), pages 537-556, December.
    11. Biswas, Partha P. & Suganthan, P.N. & Qu, B.Y. & Amaratunga, Gehan A.J., 2018. "Multiobjective economic-environmental power dispatch with stochastic wind-solar-small hydro power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 1039-1057.
    12. Teichgraeber, Holger & Brandt, Adam R., 2019. "Clustering methods to find representative periods for the optimization of energy systems: An initial framework and comparison," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1283-1293.
    13. Li, Shuai & Ma, Hongjie & Li, Weiyi, 2017. "Typical solar radiation year construction using k-means clustering and discrete-time Markov chain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 720-731.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hang Liu & Shilin Nie, 2019. "Low Carbon Scheduling Optimization of Flexible Integrated Energy System Considering CVaR and Energy Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-27, September.
    2. Marco van Dijk & Stefanus Johannes van Vuuren & Giovanna Cavazzini & Chantel Monica Niebuhr & Alberto Santolin, 2022. "Optimizing Conduit Hydropower Potential by Determining Pareto-Optimal Trade-Off Curve," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Minhui Qian & Ning Chen & Yuge Chen & Changming Chen & Weiqiang Qiu & Dawei Zhao & Zhenzhi Lin, 2021. "Optimal Coordinated Dispatching Strategy of Multi-Sources Power System with Wind, Hydro and Thermal Power Based on CVaR in Typhoon Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-35, June.
    4. Jun Dong & Shilin Nie & Hui Huang & Peiwen Yang & Anyuan Fu & Jin Lin, 2019. "Research on Economic Operation Strategy of CHP Microgrid Considering Renewable Energy Sources and Integrated Energy Demand Response," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Hang Liu & Yongcheng Wang & Shilin Nie & Yi Wang & Yu Chen, 2022. "Multistage Economic Scheduling Model of Micro-Energy Grids Considering Flexible Capacity Allocation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, July.
    6. Yue Chen & Zhizhong Guo & Abebe Tilahun Tadie & Hongbo Li & Guizhong Wang & Yingwei Hou, 2019. "Tie-Line Reserve Power Probability Margin for Day-Ahead Dispatching in Power Systems with High Proportion Renewable Power Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Yuqi & Zhou, Jianzhong & Liu, Guangbiao & Mo, Li & Wang, Yongqiang & Jia, Benjun & He, Feifei, 2020. "Multi-plan formulation of hydropower generation considering uncertainty of wind power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    2. Lavrič, Henrik & Rihar, Andraž & Fišer, Rastko, 2018. "Simulation of electrical energy production in Archimedes screw-based ultra-low head small hydropower plant considering environment protection conditions and technical limitations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 87-98.
    3. Jung, In Hyuk & Kim, Young Soo & Shin, Dong Ho & Chung, Jin Taek & Shin, Youhwan, 2019. "Influence of spear needle eccentricity on jet quality in micro Pelton turbine for power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 58-65.
    4. Zhang, Yusheng & Ma, Chao & Yang, Yang & Pang, Xiulan & Liu, Lu & Lian, Jijian, 2021. "Study on short-term optimal operation of cascade hydro-photovoltaic hybrid systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    5. Ming, Bo & Liu, Pan & Guo, Shenglian & Cheng, Lei & Zhou, Yanlai & Gao, Shida & Li, He, 2018. "Robust hydroelectric unit commitment considering integration of large-scale photovoltaic power: A case study in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1341-1352.
    6. Wang, Yuwei & Tang, Liu & Yang, Yuanjuan & Sun, Wei & Zhao, Huiru, 2020. "A stochastic-robust coordinated optimization model for CCHP micro-grid considering multi-energy operation and power trading with electricity markets under uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    7. Nikzad, Mehdi & Samimi, Abouzar, 2021. "Integration of designing price-based demand response models into a stochastic bi-level scheduling of multiple energy carrier microgrids considering energy storage systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    8. Qiu, Haifeng & Gu, Wei & Liu, Pengxiang & Sun, Qirun & Wu, Zhi & Lu, Xi, 2022. "Application of two-stage robust optimization theory in power system scheduling under uncertainties: A review and perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    9. Ming, Bo & Liu, Pan & Guo, Shenglian & Cheng, Lei & Zhang, Jingwen, 2019. "Hydropower reservoir reoperation to adapt to large-scale photovoltaic power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 268-279.
    10. Ji, Bin & Zhang, Binqiao & Yu, Samson S. & Zhang, Dezhi & Yuan, Xiaohui, 2021. "An enhanced Borg algorithmic framework for solving the hydro-thermal-wind Co-scheduling problem," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    11. Roy, Sanjoy, 2019. "Run-of-river hydro generation in presence of sub-daily source flow variations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1268-1276.
    12. Zhou, Yanlai & Chang, Li-Chiu & Uen, Tin-Shuan & Guo, Shenglian & Xu, Chong-Yu & Chang, Fi-John, 2019. "Prospect for small-hydropower installation settled upon optimal water allocation: An action to stimulate synergies of water-food-energy nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 668-682.
    13. Kumbuso Joshua Nyoni & Anesu Maronga & Paul Gerard Tuohy & Agabu Shane, 2021. "Hydro–Connected Floating PV Renewable Energy System and Onshore Wind Potential in Zambia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-42, August.
    14. Guo, Yi & Ming, Bo & Huang, Qiang & Wang, Yimin & Zheng, Xudong & Zhang, Wei, 2022. "Risk-averse day-ahead generation scheduling of hydro–wind–photovoltaic complementary systems considering the steady requirement of power delivery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    15. Li, M.S. & Lin, Z.J. & Ji, T.Y. & Wu, Q.H., 2018. "Risk constrained stochastic economic dispatch considering dependence of multiple wind farms using pair-copula," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 967-978.
    16. Àlex Alonso-Travesset & Helena Martín & Sergio Coronas & Jordi de la Hoz, 2022. "Optimization Models under Uncertainty in Distributed Generation Systems: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-40, March.
    17. Kan, Kan & Zhang, Qingying & Xu, Zhe & Zheng, Yuan & Gao, Qiang & Shen, Lian, 2022. "Energy loss mechanism due to tip leakage flow of axial flow pump as turbine under various operating conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    18. Fernández-Blanco, R. & Kavvadias, K. & Hidalgo González, I., 2017. "Quantifying the water-power linkage on hydrothermal power systems: A Greek case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 240-253.
    19. Joe Butchers & Shaun Benzon & Sam Williamson & Julian Booker & George Aggidis, 2021. "A Rationalised CFD Design Methodology for Turgo Turbines to Enable Local Manufacture in the Global South," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, October.
    20. Vermaak, Herman Jacobus & Kusakana, Kanzumba & Koko, Sandile Philip, 2014. "Status of micro-hydrokinetic river technology in rural applications: A review of literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 625-633.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:2829-:d:232211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.