IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i10p2788-d231479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Transience and Participation in University Student-Led Food Gardens

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca Laycock Pedersen

    (Department of Strategic Sustainable Development, Blekinge Institute of Technology, 371 41 Karlskrona, Sweden
    School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK)

  • Zoe P. Robinson

    (School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK)

  • Emma Surman

    (Keele Management School, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK)

Abstract

In an increasingly mobile world, transience is becoming the norm. Sustainable community food initiatives, therefore, must organise to withstand high turnover of volunteers. Using a case study of the United Kingdom’s National Union of Students’ food growing scheme in universities, this paper aims to map the causes and effects of short-term, irregular, and low participation using a causal loop diagram to understand how to mitigate their negative impacts and improve participation. Data was gathered through interviews, workshops, photovoice, a fishbowl discussion, and a reflective diary. We found three amplifying feedback loops increasing short-term, irregular and low participation, their causes, and their impacts. These feedback loops were precariously buffered by a continuous in-flow of new potential participants each academic year. We also found that the stakeholders of these gardens conceptualised time akin to both temporary and permanent organisations, and these differing conceptualisations were a source of tension. Furthermore, although ‘organisational amnesia’ was a problem, the gardens were still learningful spaces. We recommend both upstream and downstream solutions are implemented to buffer the impacts of transience and suggest that university and students’ union staff could play a crucial and subtle supporting role.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca Laycock Pedersen & Zoe P. Robinson & Emma Surman, 2019. "Understanding Transience and Participation in University Student-Led Food Gardens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:2788-:d:231479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2788/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2788/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bas Spierings & Ilse Van Liempt & Emiel Maliepaard, 2018. "Ownership and Membership: Practices and Experiences of Neighbourhood Residents in the Wijsgeren Community Garden in Amsterdam," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 109(5), pages 677-684, December.
    2. Ibert, Oliver, 2004. "Projects and firms as discordant complements: organisational learning in the Munich software ecology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1529-1546, December.
    3. Efrat Eizenberg, 2012. "The Changing Meaning of Community Space: Two Models of NGO Management of Community Gardens in New York City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 106-120, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pauline Marsh & Suzanne Mallick & Emily Flies & Penelope Jones & Sue Pearson & Iain Koolhof & Jason Byrne & Dave Kendal, 2020. "Trust, Connection and Equity: Can Understanding Context Help to Establish Successful Campus Community Gardens?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-25, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuebart, Andreas & Ibert, Oliver, 2019. "Beyond territorial conceptions of entrepreneurial ecosystems: The dynamic spatiality of knowledge brokering in seed accelerators," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 63(2-4), pages 118-133.
    2. Martin M�ller & Allison Stewart, 2016. "Does Temporary Geographical Proximity Predict Learning? Knowledge Dynamics in the Olympic Games," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 377-390, March.
    3. Harald Bathelt & Sebastian Henn, 2014. "The Geographies of Knowledge Transfers over Distance: Toward a Typology," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(6), pages 1403-1424, June.
    4. Michaela Trippl & Franz Tödtling & Lukas Lengauer, 2009. "Knowledge Sourcing Beyond Buzz and Pipelines: Evidence from the Vienna Software Sector," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 85(4), pages 443-462, October.
    5. Trippl, Michaela & Tödtling, Franz & Lengauer, Lukas, 2007. "The Vienna software cluster: local buzz without global pipelines?," SRE-Discussion Papers 2007/07, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    6. Simone Strambach & Cornelia Storz, 2008. "Pfadabhängigkeit und Pfadelastizität von Innovationssystemen: die deutsche und japanische Softwareindustrie," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 77(2), pages 142-161.
    7. Cacciatori, Eugenia, 2008. "Memory objects in project environments: Storing, retrieving and adapting learning in project-based firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1591-1601, October.
    8. Ellen van Holstein, 2020. "Strategies of self-organising communities in a gentrifying city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(6), pages 1284-1300, May.
    9. Marit Rosol, 2012. "Book Review: Power at the Roots: Gentrification, Community Gardens, and the Puerto Ricans of the Lower East Side," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(5), pages 1155-1157, April.
    10. Sarpong, David & Maclean, Mairi, 2014. "Unpacking strategic foresight: A practice approach," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 16-26.
    11. Michael C. Ewers & Edward J. Malecki, 2010. "Leapfrogging Into The Knowledge Economy: Assessing The Economic Development Strategies Of The Arab Gulf States," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 101(5), pages 494-508, December.
    12. Hua Zheng & Min Guo & Qian Wang & Qinghai Zhang & Noriko Akita, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Current Knowledge Structure and Research Progress Related to Urban Community Garden Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-34, January.
    13. Ferriani, Simone & Cattani, Gino & Baden-Fuller, Charles, 2009. "The relational antecedents of project-entrepreneurship: Network centrality, team composition and project performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 1545-1558, December.
    14. Ibert, Oliver, 2009. "Innovationsorientierte Planung und das Problem des episodischen Lernens," Arbeitsmaterial der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Dannenberg, Peter & Köhler, Hadia & Lang, Thilo & Utz, Judith & Zakirova, Betka & Zimmermann, Thomas (ed.), Innovationen im Raum - Raum für Innovationen: 11. Junges Forum der ARL, 21. bis 23. Mai 2008 in Berlin, volume 127, pages 18-28, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    15. Trippl, Michaela & Lengauer, Lukas & Tödtling, Franz, 2007. "Innovation und Wissensnetze im Wiener Informations- und Kommunikationtechnologiecluster," SRE-Discussion Papers 2007/02, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    16. Xi-Zhang Shan & Xijun Yu, 2014. "Citizen Assessment as Policy Tool of Urban Public Services: Empirical Evidence from Assessments of Urban Green Spaces in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-17, November.
    17. María José Zapata Campos & Patrik Zapata & Isabel Ordoñez, 2020. "Urban commoning practices in the repair movement: Frontstaging the backstage," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(6), pages 1150-1170, September.
    18. Manning, Stephan, 2017. "The rise of project network organizations: Building core teams and flexible partner pools for interorganizational projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1399-1415.
    19. Martin Warland, 2016. "What kinds of regional innovation systems occur around federal agencies?," Diskussionsschriften credresearchpaper10, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft - CRED.
    20. Julien de Benedittis, 2019. "Transition between temporary organizations: Dimensions enabling economies of recombination," Post-Print emse-02267574, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:2788-:d:231479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.