IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i9p3288-d169896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response of Carbon Dynamics to Climate Change Varied among Different Vegetation Types in Central Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Qifei Han

    (Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disaster, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Geping Luo

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China)

  • Chaofan Li

    (Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disaster, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Shoubo Li

    (Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disaster, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

Abstract

The effect of climate change on the spatio-temporal patterns of the terrestrial carbon dynamics in Central Asia have not been adequately quantified despite its potential importance to the global carbon cycle. Therefore, the modified BioGeochemical Cycles (Biome-BGC) model was applied in this study to evaluate the impacts of climatic change on net primary productivity (NPP) and net ecosystem productivity. Four vegetation types were studied during the period 1979 to 2011: cropland, grassland, forest, and shrubland. The results indicated that: (1) The climate data showed that Central Asia experienced a rise in annual mean temperature and a decline in precipitation from 1979 to 2011; (2) the mean NPP for Central Asia in 1979–2011 was 281.79 gC m −2 yr −1 , and the cropland had the highest NPP compared with the other vegetation types, with a value of 646.25 gC m −2 yr −1 ; (3) grassland presented as a carbon source (−0.21 gC m −2 yr −1 ), whereas the other three types were carbon sinks; (4) the four vegetation types showed similar responses to climate variation during the past 30 years, and grassland is the most sensitive ecosystem in Central Asia. This study explored the possible implications for climate adaptation and mitigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Qifei Han & Geping Luo & Chaofan Li & Shoubo Li, 2018. "Response of Carbon Dynamics to Climate Change Varied among Different Vegetation Types in Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:3288-:d:169896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3288/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3288/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sun, Qingling & Li, Baolin & Zhang, Tao & Yuan, Yecheng & Gao, Xizhang & Ge, Jinsong & Li, Fei & Zhang, Zhijun, 2017. "An improved Biome-BGC model for estimating net primary productivity of alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 350(C), pages 55-68.
    2. Chiesi, M. & Maselli, F. & Moriondo, M. & Fibbi, L. & Bindi, M. & Running, S.W., 2007. "Application of BIOME-BGC to simulate Mediterranean forest processes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 179-190.
    3. Shanin, Vladimir N. & Komarov, Alexander S. & Mikhailov, Alexey V. & Bykhovets, Sergei S., 2011. "Modelling carbon and nitrogen dynamics in forest ecosystems of Central Russia under different climate change scenarios and forest management regimes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2262-2275.
    4. Hidy, D. & Barcza, Z. & Haszpra, L. & Churkina, G. & Pintér, K. & Nagy, Z., 2012. "Development of the Biome-BGC model for simulation of managed herbaceous ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 99-119.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Srinet, Ritika & Nandy, Subrata & Patel, N.R. & Padalia, Hitendra & Watham, Taibanganba & Singh, Sanjeev K. & Chauhan, Prakash, 2023. "Simulation of forest carbon fluxes by integrating remote sensing data into biome-BGC model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    2. Peng Cai & Chaofan Li & Geping Luo & Chi Zhang & Friday Uchenna Ochege & Steven Caluwaerts & Lesley De Cruz & Rozemien De Troch & Sara Top & Piet Termonia & Philippe De Maeyer, 2020. "The Responses of the Ecosystems in the Tianshan North Slope under Multiple Representative Concentration Pathway Scenarios in the Middle of the 21st Century," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Altanshagai Batmunkh & Agus Dwi Nugroho & Maria Fekete-Farkas & Zoltan Lakner, 2022. "Global Challenges and Responses: Agriculture, Economic Globalization, and Environmental Sustainability in Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maša Zorana Ostrogović Sever & Zoltán Barcza & Dóra Hidy & Anikó Kern & Doroteja Dimoski & Slobodan Miko & Ozren Hasan & Branka Grahovac & Hrvoje Marjanović, 2021. "Evaluation of the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model Biome-BGCMuSo for Modelling Soil Organic Carbon under Different Land Uses," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Chaobin Zhang & Ying Zhang & Jianlong Li, 2019. "Grassland Productivity Response to Climate Change in the Hulunbuir Steppes of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-15, November.
    3. González-Sanchis, Marí a & Del Campo, Antonio D. & Molina, Antonio J. & Fernandes, Tarcí sio J.G., 2015. "Modeling adaptive forest management of a semi-arid Mediterranean Aleppo pine plantation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 308(C), pages 34-44.
    4. Han, Qifei & Li, Chaofan & Zhao, Chengyi & Zhang, Yaoqi & Li, Shoubo, 2018. "Grazing decreased water use efficiency in Central Asia from 1979 to 2011," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 388(C), pages 72-79.
    5. Wang, Qinying & He, Hong S. & Liu, Kai & Zong, Shengwei & Du, Haibo, 2023. "Comparing simulated tree biomass from daily, monthly, and seasonal climate input of terrestrial ecosystem model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 483(C).
    6. Ma, Shaoxiu & Churkina, Galina & Wieland, Ralf & Gessler, Arthur, 2011. "Optimization and evaluation of the ANTHRO-BGC model for winter crops in Europe," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(20), pages 3662-3679.
    7. Sun, Qingling & Li, Baolin & Zhang, Tao & Yuan, Yecheng & Gao, Xizhang & Ge, Jinsong & Li, Fei & Zhang, Zhijun, 2017. "An improved Biome-BGC model for estimating net primary productivity of alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 350(C), pages 55-68.
    8. Collalti, Alessio & Perugini, Lucia & Santini, Monia & Chiti, Tommaso & Nolè, Angelo & Matteucci, Giorgio & Valentini, Riccardo, 2014. "A process-based model to simulate growth in forests with complex structure: Evaluation and use of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model in a deciduous forest in Central Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 362-378.
    9. Ruiz-Pérez, G. & González-Sanchis, M. & Del Campo, A.D. & Francés, F., 2016. "Can a parsimonious model implemented with satellite data be used for modelling the vegetation dynamics and water cycle in water-controlled environments?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 324(C), pages 45-53.
    10. Puertes, Cristina & González-Sanchis, María & Lidón, Antonio & Bautista, Inmaculada & del Campo, Antonio D. & Lull, Cristina & Francés, Félix, 2020. "Improving the modelling and understanding of carbon-nitrogen-water interactions in a semiarid Mediterranean oak forest," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 420(C).
    11. Kipling, Richard P. & Bannink, André & Bellocchi, Gianni & Dalgaard, Tommy & Fox, Naomi J. & Hutchings, Nicholas J. & Kjeldsen, Chris & Lacetera, Nicola & Sinabell, Franz & Topp, Cairistiona F.E. & va, 2016. "Modeling European ruminant production systems: Facing the challenges of climate change," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 24-37.
    12. Mattia Cai & Roberto Ferrise & Marco Moriondo & Paulo A.L.D. Nunes & Marco Bindi, 2011. "Climate Change and Tourism in Tuscany, Italy. What if heat becomes unbearable?," Working Papers 2011.67, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    13. Shanin, Vladimir & Komarov, Alexander & Khoraskina, Yulia & Bykhovets, Sergey & Linkosalo, Tapio & Mäkipää, Raisa, 2013. "Carbon turnover in mixed stands: Modelling possible shifts under climate change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 232-245.
    14. Shixian Xu & Xinjun Wang & Xiaofei Ma & Shenghan Gao, 2023. "Risk Assessment and Prediction of Soil Water Erosion on the Middle Northern Slope of Tianshan Mountain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Xiaotao Huang & Yongsheng Yang & Chunbo Chen & Hongfei Zhao & Buqing Yao & Zhen Ma & Li Ma & Huakun Zhou, 2022. "Quantifying and Mapping Human Appropriation of Net Primary Productivity in Qinghai Grasslands in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, March.
    16. Matthew Reeves & Adam Moreno & Karen Bagne & Steven Running, 2014. "Estimating climate change effects on net primary production of rangelands in the United States," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 126(3), pages 429-442, October.
    17. Maselli, F. & Vaccari, F.P. & Chiesi, M. & Romanelli, S. & D’Acqui, L.P., 2017. "Modelling and analyzing the water and carbon dynamics of Mediterranean macchia by the use of ground and remote sensing data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 351(C), pages 1-13.
    18. Junyi Liu & Zhixiang Wu & Siqi Yang & Chuan Yang, 2022. "Sensitivity Analysis of Biome-BGC for Gross Primary Production of a Rubber Plantation Ecosystem: A Case Study of Hainan Island, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-13, October.
    19. Maselli, Fabio & Chiesi, Marta & Brilli, Lorenzo & Moriondo, Marco, 2012. "Simulation of olive fruit yield in Tuscany through the integration of remote sensing and ground data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 244(C), pages 1-12.
    20. Ekaterina Tarasova & Riccardo Valentini & Giulio Di Lallo & Alexander Cotrina-Sanchez & Maria Vincenza Chiriacò, 2024. "Enhancing Carbon Sequestration: A Systematic Literature Review of Spatial Decision Support Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:3288-:d:169896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.