IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i4p1024-d138859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Arable Land Alone Ensure Food Security? The Concept of Arable Land Equivalent Unit and Its Implications in Zhoushan City, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yongzhong Tan

    (Department of Land Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Ju He

    (Department of Land Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Zhenning Yu

    (Department of Land Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Yonghua Tan

    (Second Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Hangzhou 310012, China)

Abstract

The requisition–compensation balance of farmlands (RCBF) is a strict Chinese policy that aims to ensure food security. However, the process of supplementing arable land has substantially damaged the ecological environment through the blind development of grasslands, woodlands, and wetlands to supplement arable land. Can arable land alone ensure food security? To answer this question, this study introduced the concepts of arable land equivalent unit (ALEU) and food equivalent unit (FEU) based on the idea of food security. Zhoushan City in Zhejiang Province, China was selected as the research area. This study analyzed the ALEU supply and demand capabilities in the study area and presented the corresponding policy implications for the RCBF improvement. The results showed that the proportion of ALEU from arable land and waters for aquaculture is from 46:54 in 2009 to 31:69 in 2015, thereby suggesting that aquaculture waters can also be important in food security. Under three different living standards (i.e., adequate food and clothing, well-off, and affluence), ALEU from arable land can barely meet the needs of the permanent resident population in the study area. However, ALEU from aquaculture waters can provide important supplementation. Therefore, we suggest that food supply capability from land types other than the arable land be taken seriously. Furthermore, RCBF can be improved with ALEU as core of the balance.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongzhong Tan & Ju He & Zhenning Yu & Yonghua Tan, 2018. "Can Arable Land Alone Ensure Food Security? The Concept of Arable Land Equivalent Unit and Its Implications in Zhoushan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:1024-:d:138859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1024/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1024/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hui Gao & Jintong Liu & A. Egrinya Eneji & Lipu Han & Limei Tan, 2016. "Using Modified Remote Sensing Imagery to Interpret Changes in Cultivated Land under Saline-Alkali Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Tiziano Gomiero, 2016. "Soil Degradation, Land Scarcity and Food Security: Reviewing a Complex Challenge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-41, March.
    3. Yu, Zhenning & Wu, Cifang & Tan, Yongzhong & Zhang, Xiaobin, 2018. "The dilemma of land expansion and governance in rural China: A comparative study based on three townships in Zhejiang Province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 602-611.
    4. Cao, Mingkui & Ma, Shijun & Han, Chunru, 1995. "Potential productivity and human carrying capacity of an agro-ecosystem: An analysis of food production potential of China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 387-414.
    5. Reshmita Nath & Yibo Luan & Wangming Yang & Chen Yang & Wen Chen & Qian Li & Xuefeng Cui, 2015. "Changes in Arable Land Demand for Food in India and China: A Potential Threat to Food Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-27, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaojie Chen & Jing Wang, 2021. "Quantitatively Determining the Priorities of Regional Ecological Compensation for Cultivated Land in Different Main Functional Areas: A Case Study of Hubei Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Yogeeswari Subramaniam & Tajul Ariffin Masron & Nanthakumar Loganathan, 2024. "Imports and Food Security," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 16(1), pages 7-24, January.
    3. Tao Jin & Candi Ge & Hui Gao & Hongcheng Zhang & Xiaolong Sun, 2020. "Evaluation and Screening of Co-Culture Farming Models in Rice Field Based on Food Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Andi Amran Sulaiman & Yiyi Sulaeman & Budiman Minasny, 2019. "A Framework for the Development of Wetland for Agricultural Use in Indonesia," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Wenbo Li & Dongyan Wang & Shuhan Liu & Yuanli Zhu & Zhuoran Yan, 2020. "Reclamation of Cultivated Land Reserves in Northeast China: Indigenous Ecological Insecurity Underlying National Food Security," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Kristine Lien Skog, 2018. "How Do Policies and Actors’ Attitudes, Interests and Interactions Influence Farmland Conversion Outcomes in Land-Use Planning?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Honglei Jiang & Xia Xu & Mengxi Guan & Lingfei Wang & Yongmei Huang & Yinghui Liu, 2019. "Simulation of Spatiotemporal Land Use Changes for Integrated Model of Socioeconomic and Ecological Processes in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, July.
    2. GAO Tianming & Anna Ivolga & Vasilii Erokhin, 2018. "Sustainable Rural Development in Northern China: Caught in a Vice between Poverty, Urban Attractions, and Migration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Timothy E. Crews & Douglas J. Cattani, 2018. "Strategies, Advances, and Challenges in Breeding Perennial Grain Crops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-7, June.
    4. Io Carydi & Athanasios Koutsianas & Marios Desyllas, 2023. "People, Crops, and Bee Farming: Landscape Models for a Symbiotic Network in Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Xiaoyu Liu & Liangjie Xin, 2022. "Assessment of the Efficiency of Cultivated Land Occupied by Urban and Rural Construction Land in China from 1990 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-12, June.
    6. Danilo Đokić & Bojan Matkovski & Marija Jeremić & Ivan Đurić, 2022. "Land Productivity and Agri-Environmental Indicators: A Case Study of Western Balkans," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Lu, C. H. & van Ittersum, M. K. & Rabbinge, R., 2004. "A scenario exploration of strategic land use options for the Loess Plateau in northern China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 145-170, February.
    8. Marco Bascietto & Enrico Santangelo & Claudio Beni, 2021. "Spatial Variations of Vegetation Index from Remote Sensing Linked to Soil Colloidal Status," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Chong Zhao & Yong Zhou & Xigui Li & Pengnan Xiao & Jinhui Jiang, 2018. "Assessment of Cultivated Land Productivity and Its Spatial Differentiation in Dongting Lake Region: A Case Study of Yuanjiang City, Hunan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Jia Gao & Ge Song & Shuhan Liu, 2022. "Factors influencing farmers’ willingness and behavior choices to withdraw from rural homesteads in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 112-131, March.
    11. Fabio Recanatesi & Matteo Clemente & Efstathios Grigoriadis & Flavia Ranalli & Marco Zitti & Luca Salvati, 2015. "A Fifty-Year Sustainability Assessment of Italian Agro-Forest Districts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Neetu Abey George & Fiona H. McKay, 2019. "The Public Distribution System and Food Security in India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-14, September.
    13. Felicia Cheţan & Teodor Rusu & Cornel Cheţan & Camelia Urdă & Raluca Rezi & Alina Şimon & Ileana Bogdan, 2022. "Influence of Soil Tillage Systems on the Yield and Weeds Infestation in the Soybean Crop," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, October.
    14. Xinliang Xu & Hongyan Cai & Daowei Sun & Lan Hu & Kwamina E. Banson, 2016. "Impacts of Mining and Urbanization on the Qin-Ba Mountainous Environment, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Anna Westerbergh & Estelle Lerceteau-Köhler & Mohammad Sameri & Girma Bedada & Per-Olof Lundquist, 2018. "Towards the Development of Perennial Barley for Cold Temperate Climates—Evaluation of Wild Barley Relatives as Genetic Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Shukla, Sumedha & Arora, Gaurav, 2023. "Soil quality perceptions: Characterizing bias and linkage with farming decisions for rice- growers in India," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 336014, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Monther M. Tahat & Kholoud M. Alananbeh & Yahia A. Othman & Daniel I. Leskovar, 2020. "Soil Health and Sustainable Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, June.
    18. Hinge, Gilbert & Surampalli, Rao Y. & Goyal, Manish Kumar & Gupta, Brij B. & Chang, Xiaojun, 2021. "Soil carbon and its associate resilience using big data analytics: For food Security and environmental management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    19. Öhlund, Erika & Malmaeus, Mikael & Fauré, Eléonore, 2020. "The significance of different realms of value for agricultural land in Sweden," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    20. Wang, Qing & Liu, Xuehua & Yue, Tianxiang & Wang, Chenliang & Wilson, John P., 2015. "Using models and spatial analysis to analyze spatio-temporal variations of food provision and food potential across China's agro-ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 306(C), pages 152-159.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:1024-:d:138859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.