IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i6p941-d842265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Efficiency of Cultivated Land Occupied by Urban and Rural Construction Land in China from 1990 to 2020

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyu Liu

    (Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Liangjie Xin

    (Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

The rapid urbanization and economic growth experienced by China in recent years has led to the expansion of construction land. This has resulted in the substantial transformation of cultivated land to construction land. However, the efficiency of cultivated land occupation by construction land, its regional differences, and the urban-rural disparity in China remain unclear. Therefore, using population and land use data, we measured the efficiency of cultivated land occupied by urban and rural construction land in China during 1990–2020 by proposing absolute, differential, and relative efficiency evaluation methods. Our study revealed that the cultivated land area occupied by rural construction land is 22.4% higher than that of urban construction land. The efficiency of cultivated land occupied by construction land in urban areas was higher than that in rural areas. Spatially, the population in the urban and rural construction land-occupied cultivated land area shows a pattern of high in the southeast and low in the northwest. The efficiency of urban and rural construction land-occupied cultivated land increases with increasing urban size. Thus, to improve the efficiency of cultivated land occupied by construction land, the strict control on the urban construction occupation of cultivated land should be loosened, particularly for larger cities, and the control on inefficient construction in rural areas should be tightened.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyu Liu & Liangjie Xin, 2022. "Assessment of the Efficiency of Cultivated Land Occupied by Urban and Rural Construction Land in China from 1990 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:941-:d:842265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/941/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/6/941/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu, Zhenning & Wu, Cifang & Tan, Yongzhong & Zhang, Xiaobin, 2018. "The dilemma of land expansion and governance in rural China: A comparative study based on three townships in Zhejiang Province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 602-611.
    2. Xueru Zhang & Jie Wang & Wei Song & Fengfei Wang & Xing Gao & Lei Liu & Kun Dong & Dazhi Yang, 2022. "Decoupling Analysis between Rural Population Change and Rural Construction Land Changes in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Xianguo Li & Qian Zhang, 2015. "AHP-based resources and environment efficiency evaluation index system construction about the west side of Taiwan Straits," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 228(1), pages 97-111, May.
    4. Yangbing Miao & Jiajie Liu & Raymond Yu Wang, 2021. "Occupation of Cultivated Land for Urban–Rural Expansion in China: Evidence from National Land Survey 1996–2006," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Han & Zheng, Jinhui & Hunjra, Ahmed Imran & Zhao, Shikuan & Bouri, Elie, 2024. "How does urban land use efficiency improve resource and environment carrying capacity?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zijuan Zhao & Beilei Fan & Qingbo Zhou & Shihao Xu, 2022. "Simulating the Coupling of Rural Settlement Expansion and Population Growth in Deqing, Zhejiang Province, Based on MCCA Modeling," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Lin Meng & Wentao Si, 2022. "The Driving Mechanism of Urban Land Expansion from 2005 to 2018: The Case of Yangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Yan Xu & Chung-Hsing Yeh, 2017. "Sustainability-based selection decisions for e-waste recycling operations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 531-552, January.
    4. Jia Gao & Ge Song & Shuhan Liu, 2022. "Factors influencing farmers’ willingness and behavior choices to withdraw from rural homesteads in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 112-131, March.
    5. Lorena Pradenas & Marco Fuentes & Víctor Parada, 2020. "Optimizing waste storage areas in health care centers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(1), pages 503-516, December.
    6. Wu, Xiaoran & Zhao, Na & Wang, Yuwei & Zhang, Liqiang & Wang, Wei & Liu, Yansui, 2024. "Cropland non-agriculturalization caused by the expansion of built-up areas in China during 1990–2020," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    7. Wenzhe Luo & Yanling Jiang & Yuansheng Chen & Zhigang Yu, 2023. "Coupling Coordination and Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Water-Land-Food Nexus: A Case Study of Hebei Province at a County-Level," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Liu, Runqiu & Jiang, Jian & Yu, Chao & Rodenbiker, Jesse & Jiang, Yongmu, 2021. "The endowment effect accompanying villagers' withdrawal from rural homesteads: Field evidence from Chengdu, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    9. Shanshan Jia & Peiyao Li & Wenxiao Jia & Xiaorui Chen, 2025. "Rates and Patterns of Town Expansion in China’s 17 Shrinking Tourism-Type Counties," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Zhou, Bing-Bing & Aggarwal, Rimjhim & Wu, Jianguo & Lv, Ligang, 2021. "Urbanization-associated farmland loss: A macro-micro comparative study in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    11. Yingxue Rao & Chenxi Wu & Qingsong He, 2025. "Uneven diffusion: a multi-scale analysis of rural settlement evolution and its driving forces in China from 2000–2020," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Yang Wang & Chengchao Zuo & Mengke Zhu, 2024. "How Semi-Urbanisation Drives Expansion of Rural Construction Land in China: A Rural-Urban Interaction Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Yunxian Yan & Lingqing Wang & Jun Yang, 2022. "The Willingness and Technology Preferences of Farmers and Their Influencing Factors for Soil Remediation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    14. Zhao, Xiang & Cai, Bocheng & He, Jianhua & Kong, Xuesong, 2024. "Identifying potential rural residential areas for land consolidation using a data driven agent-based model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    15. Suxia Zhao & Mengmeng Yin, 2023. "Research on Rural Population/Arable Land/Rural Settlements Association Model and Coordinated Development Path: A Case Analysis of the Yellow River Basin (Henan Section)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-15, February.
    16. Liu, Shuchang & Xiao, Wu & Ye, Yanmei & He, Tingting & Luo, Heng, 2023. "Rural residential land expansion and its impacts on cultivated land in China between 1990 and 2020," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    17. Yubo Wang & Yuyu Xue & Jianchao Xi, 2022. "Inter-Provincial Differences in Potential Obstacles to Land Transfer Income to Support Rural Revitalization in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Libang Ma & Shichun Liu & Yiwen Niu & Meimei Chen, 2018. "Village-Scale Livelihood Change and the Response of Rural Settlement Land Use: Sihe Village of Tongwei County in Mid-Gansu Loess Hilly Region as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, August.
    19. Ting Zhang & Jia Li & Yan Wang, 2023. "Effects of Livelihood Capital on the Farmers’ Behavioral Intention of Rural Residential Land Development Right Transfer: Evidence from Wujin District, Changzhou City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, June.
    20. Jiwei Li & Qingqing Ye & Weiqiang Chen & Xuesong Kong & Qingsheng Bi & Jie Lu & Enxiang Cai & Hejie Wei & Xinwei Feng & Yulong Guo, 2022. "An Analysis Method of Quantitative Coupling Rationality between Urban–Rural Construction Land and Population: A Case Study of Henan Province in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:941-:d:842265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.