IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i11p3920-d178828.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diversified Forage Cropping Systems and Their Implications on Resilience and Productivity

Author

Listed:
  • M. Anowarul Islam

    (Department of Plant Sciences, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Avenue, Laramie, WY 82071, USA)

  • Dennis S. Ashilenje

    (Department of Plant Sciences, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Avenue, Laramie, WY 82071, USA)

Abstract

Plant diversity is associated with resilient ecosystems. Loss of plant biodiversity triggered by anthropogenic and climatic factors jeopardizes environmental stability and sustainable forage production. The understanding of biodiversity mechanisms and functional traits of species can help to design forage production systems to buffer against perturbations. Resilience and productivity are linked to plant species characteristics and interactions that enable them to recover from adverse conditions and compensate for the loss of susceptible species. Benefits of diversified crops including enhanced carbon assimilation, nitrogen fixation, and turnover are transferred to soil microbes which in return contribute to resilience against drought and poor soil fertility. In the absence of disturbances, these mechanisms are credited for stability and climax ecosystems. Cultivated systems are more fragile because management interferes with many functions while maintaining few. Strategies that sustain an entire range of functions can increase production regardless of climatic and management factors. This has been demonstrated in binary mixtures of cool season grasses including meadow bromegrass ( Bromus biebersteinii Roem. & Schult.), orchardgrass ( Dactylis glomerata L.), smooth bromegrass ( Bromus inermis Leyss.), and intermediate wheatgrass ( Thinopyrum intermedium (Host) Barkworth & D.R. Dewey) with alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.). Suitable combinations of perennial species and cultivars bred for compatible traits can enhance resilience and productivity in a wide range of ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Anowarul Islam & Dennis S. Ashilenje, 2018. "Diversified Forage Cropping Systems and Their Implications on Resilience and Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:3920-:d:178828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/3920/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/3920/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bhandari, Basu Deb & Gillespie, Jeffrey & Scaglia, Guillermo & Wang, Jim & Salassi, Michael, 2015. "Analysis Of Pasture Systems To Maximize The Profitability And Sustainability Of Grass-Fed Beef Production," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(2), pages 193-212, May.
    2. Matthew Heron Wilson & Sarah Taylor Lovell, 2016. "Agroforestry—The Next Step in Sustainable and Resilient Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sri Astutik & Jürgen Pretzsch & Jude Ndzifon Kimengsi, 2019. "Asian Medicinal Plants’ Production and Utilization Potentials: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-33, October.
    2. Shah Fahad & Sangram Bhanudas Chavan & Akash Ravindra Chichaghare & Appanderanda Ramani Uthappa & Manish Kumar & Vijaysinha Kakade & Aliza Pradhan & Dinesh Jinger & Gauri Rawale & Dinesh Kumar Yadav &, 2022. "Agroforestry Systems for Soil Health Improvement and Maintenance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-25, November.
    3. Theodrose Sisay & Kindie Tesfaye & Mengistu Ketema & Nigussie Dechassa & Mezegebu Getnet, 2023. "Climate-Smart Agriculture Technologies and Determinants of Farmers’ Adoption Decisions in the Great Rift Valley of Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Ana Lúcia Hanisch & Raquel R. B. Negrelle & Rafael Araújo Bonatto & Evelyn Roberta Nimmo & André Eduardo Biscaia Lacerda, 2019. "Evaluating Sustainability in Traditional Silvopastoral Systems (caívas): Looking Beyond the Impact of Animals on Biodiversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Stephen B. Stewart & Anthony P. O’Grady & Daniel S. Mendham & Greg S. Smith & Philip J. Smethurst, 2022. "Digital Tools for Quantifying the Natural Capital Benefits of Agroforestry: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-32, September.
    6. Justus G. V. van Ramshorst & Lukas Siebicke & Moritz Baumeister & Fernando E. Moyano & Alexander Knohl & Christian Markwitz, 2022. "Reducing Wind Erosion through Agroforestry: A Case Study Using Large Eddy Simulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Christian Dupraz & Kevin J. Wolz & Isabelle Lecomte & Grégoire Talbot & Grégoire Vincent & Rachmat Mulia & François Bussière & Harry Ozier-Lafontaine & Sitraka Andrianarisoa & Nick Jackson & Gerry Law, 2019. "Hi-sAFe: A 3D Agroforestry Model for Integrating Dynamic Tree–Crop Interactions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.
    8. Maharaj, Shobha S. & Asmath, Hamish & Ali, Safraz & Agard, John & Harris, Stephen A. & New, Mark, 2019. "Assessing protected area effectiveness within the Caribbean under changing climate conditions: A case study of the small island, Trinidad," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 185-193.
    9. Rita Biasi & Roberta Farina & Elena Brunori, 2021. "Family Farming Plays an Essential Role in Preserving Soil Functionality: A Study on Active Managed and Abandoned Traditional Tree Crop-Based Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Craig R. Elevitch & D. Niki Mazaroli & Diane Ragone, 2018. "Agroforestry Standards for Regenerative Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    11. Keefe O. Keeley & Kevin J. Wolz & Kaitie I. Adams & Jeannine H. Richards & Erin Hannum & Severine von Tscharner Fleming & Stephen J. Ventura, 2019. "Multi-Party Agroforestry: Emergent Approaches to Trees and Tenure on Farms in the Midwest USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, April.
    12. Bolier Torres & Cristian Vasco & Sven Günter & Thomas Knoke, 2018. "Determinants of Agricultural Diversification in a Hotspot Area: Evidence from Colonist and Indigenous Communities in the Sumaco Biosphere Reserve, Ecuadorian Amazon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    13. Christina Schaffer & Karin Eksvärd & Johanna Björklund, 2019. "Can Agroforestry Grow beyond Its Niche and Contribute to a Transition towards Sustainable Agriculture in Sweden?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-14, June.
    14. Vitalijus Stirkė & Linas Balčiauskas & Laima Balčiauskienė, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Variation of Small Mammal Communities in Commercial Orchards across the Small Country," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-12, April.
    15. Volkov, Artiom & Morkunas, Mangirdas & Balezentis, Tomas & Streimikiene, Dalia, 2022. "Are agricultural sustainability and resilience complementary notions? Evidence from the North European agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    16. Daniel Ruppert & Martin Welp & Michael Spies & Niels Thevs, 2020. "Farmers’ Perceptions of Tree Shelterbelts on Agricultural Land in Rural Kyrgyzstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Antonio Gabriel L. Resque & Emilie Coudel & Marie-Gabrielle Piketty & Nathalie Cialdella & Tatiana Sá & Marc Piraux & William Assis & Christophe Le Page, 2019. "Agrobiodiversity and Public Food Procurement Programs in Brazil: Influence of Local Stakeholders in Configuring Green Mediated Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, March.
    18. Maya Sollen-Norrlin & Bhim Bahadur Ghaley & Naomi Laura Jane Rintoul, 2020. "Agroforestry Benefits and Challenges for Adoption in Europe and Beyond," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    19. Gelton Fernando de Morais & Jenyffer da Silva Gomes Santos & Daniela Han & Luiz Octávio Ramos Filho & Marcelo Gomes Barroca Xavier & Leonardo Schimidt & Hugo Thiago de Souza & Fernanda Ticianelli de C, 2023. "Agricultural Machinery Adequacy for Handling the Mombaça Grass Biomass in Agroforestry Systems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-28, July.
    20. Jonathan P. Sheppard & Rafael Bohn Reckziegel & Lars Borrass & Paxie W. Chirwa & Claudio J. Cuaranhua & Sibylle K Hassler & Svenja Hoffmeister & Florian Kestel & Rebekka Maier & Mirko Mälicke & Christ, 2020. "Agroforestry: An Appropriate and Sustainable Response to a Changing Climate in Southern Africa?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-32, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:3920-:d:178828. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.