IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2025i7p437-d1703069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Well-Being of Young People as the Result of the Acceptance of Ethical Values in National Educational Programme

Author

Listed:
  • Kamil Turčan

    (Faculty of Social Sciences UCM in Trnava, Bučianska 4/A, 917 01 Trnava, Slovakia)

  • Andrea Čajková

    (Faculty of Social Sciences UCM in Trnava, Bučianska 4/A, 917 01 Trnava, Slovakia)

  • Ivana Butoracová Šindleryová

    (Faculty of Social Sciences UCM in Trnava, Bučianska 4/A, 917 01 Trnava, Slovakia)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze how young people in Slovakia perceive individual attributes of quality of life and to highlight the positive correlation with ethical values acquired primarily through family upbringing and, significantly, through the national education system. Quality of life is understood as a multidimensional concept encompassing opportunities, fulfillment of human needs, and subjective well-being, including dimensions such as happiness and life satisfaction. These aspects are strongly influenced by ethical values, which are particularly shaped by compulsory ethics or religious education provided to children aged 6–15 within the Slovak national curriculum. To explore the link between ethically grounded education and perceived quality of life among youth, a questionnaire-based survey was conducted. The findings reveal significant correlations between ethical or religious education and various quality of life indicators, emphasizing the importance of ethical education in shaping socially responsible and value-oriented young citizens. This study contributes to understanding the cultural and educational context influencing youth perceptions of quality of life in Slovakia.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamil Turčan & Andrea Čajková & Ivana Butoracová Šindleryová, 2025. "Well-Being of Young People as the Result of the Acceptance of Ethical Values in National Educational Programme," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:437-:d:1703069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/7/437/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/7/437/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adrian Chadi & Matthias Krapf, 2017. "The Protestant Fiscal Ethic: Religious Confession And Euro Skepticism In Germany," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(4), pages 1813-1832, October.
    2. Costanza, Robert & Fisher, Brendan & Ali, Saleem & Beer, Caroline & Bond, Lynne & Boumans, Roelof & Danigelis, Nicholas L. & Dickinson, Jennifer & Elliott, Carolyn & Farley, Joshua & Gayer, Diane Elli, 2007. "Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 267-276, March.
    3. Cohen-Zada, Danny & Elder, Todd, 2018. "Religious pluralism and the transmission of religious values through education," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 325-349.
    4. Danielle Warnecke & Rikka Wittstock & Frank Teuteberg, 2019. "Benchmarking of European smart cities – a maturity model and web-based self-assessment tool," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(4), pages 654-684, August.
    5. Benito Arruñada, 2010. "Protestants and Catholics: Similar Work Ethic, Different Social Ethic," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 120(547), pages 890-918, September.
    6. Ed Diener & Eunkook Suh, 1997. "Measuring Quality Of Life: Economic, Social, And Subjective Indicators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 189-216, January.
    7. Danielle Warnecke & Rikka Wittstock & Frank Teuteberg, 2019. "Benchmarking of European smart cities – a maturity model and web-based self-assessment tool," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(4), pages 654-684, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benito Arruñada & Matthias Krapf, 2019. "Religion and the European Union," International Economic Association Series, in: Jean-Paul Carvalho & Sriya Iyer & Jared Rubin (ed.), Advances in the Economics of Religion, chapter 0, pages 295-308, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Francisco Zorondo-Rodríguez & Mar Grau-Satorras & Jenu Kalla & Katie Demps & Erik Gómez-Baggethun & Claude García & Victoria Reyes-García, 2016. "Contribution of Natural and Economic Capital to Subjective Well-Being: Empirical Evidence from a Small-Scale Society in Kodagu (Karnataka), India," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 919-937, June.
    3. Franciely Velozo Aragão & Daiane Maria de Genaro Chiroli & Fernanda Cavicchioli Zola & Emanuely Velozo Aragão & Luis Henrique Nogueira Marinho & Ana Lidia Cascales Correa & João Carlos Colmenero, 2023. "Smart Cities Maturity Model—A Multicriteria Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Megan King & Vivian Renó & Evlyn Novo, 2014. "The Concept, Dimensions and Methods of Assessment of Human Well-Being within a Socioecological Context: A Literature Review," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 116(3), pages 681-698, May.
    5. Edson Tandoc & Bruno Takahashi, 2013. "The Complex Road to Happiness: The Influence of Human Development, a Healthy Environment and a Free Press," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(1), pages 537-550, August.
    6. Jadwiga Adamczyk & Magdalena Adamczyk-Kowalczuk, 2022. "What Do They Feel, Do, and Expect? The Young Generation’s Perception of Environmental Problems and Sustainable Development Goals in the Context of Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Gasto Jerome Lyakurwa & Mercy Chepkemoi Chepkwony & Edwin Sabuhoro, 2025. "Community Perceptions on Conservation, Livelihood Vulnerability and Quality of Life Around Tanzania’s Kilimanjaro National Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, February.
    8. Nicky Rogge & Ilse Nijverseel, 2019. "Quality of Life in the European Union: A Multidimensional Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 765-789, January.
    9. Brinja Meiseberg & Thomas Ehrmann & Aloys Prinz, 2017. "“Anything worth winning is worth cheating for”? Determinants of cheating behavior among business and theology students," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 985-1016, November.
    10. Nadeen Ihsan & Babar Aziz, 2019. "A Multidimensional Analysis of Quality of Life: Pakistan’s Context," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 201-227, February.
    11. Kubiszewski, Ida & Zakariyya, Nabeeh & Costanza, Robert, 2018. "Objective and Subjective Indicators of Life Satisfaction in Australia: How Well Do People Perceive What Supports a Good Life?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 361-372.
    12. Lei Jiang & Yuan Chen & Wenjie Liang & Bo Zhang, 2023. "Convergence Analysis of Cross-Province Human Well-Being in China: A Spatiotemporal Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Gereon tho Pesch & Anna Kristín Einarsdóttir & Kevin Joseph Dillman & Jukka Heinonen, 2023. "Energy Consumption and Human Well-Being: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Gawlik, Remigiusz & Titarenko, Roman & Titov, Sergei, 2015. "Perception of Quality of Life and its Components among Russian Students – Implications for Academic Teaching," MPRA Paper 69134, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Marcelo Furlan & Pedro Augusto Bertucci Lima & Gilberto Dias Paião Junior & Enzo Barberio Mariano & Sara Margarida Moreno Pires, 2025. "Proposing a composite index and maturity model for urban sustainability in the Brazilian context: A machine learning and data envelopment analysis approach," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 251-269, February.
    16. Musa Pazhuhan & Saeed Zanganeh Shahraki & Niloofar Kaveerad & Sirio Cividino & Matteo Clemente & Luca Salvati, 2020. "Factors Underlying Life Quality in Urban Contexts: Evidence from an Industrial City (Arak, Iran)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Hulin Pan, 2023. "Effect of the ecological environment on the residents’ happiness: the mechanism and an evidence from Zhejiang Province of China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2716-2734, March.
    18. Kubiszewski, Ida & Jarvis, Diane & Zakariyya, Nabeeh, 2019. "Spatial variations in contributors to life satisfaction: An Australian case study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    19. J. Haavard Maridal, 2017. "A Worldwide Measure of Societal Quality of Life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 1-38, October.
    20. Aleksandar Stanojević & Jože Benčina, 2019. "The Construction of an Integrated and Transparent Index of Wellbeing," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 995-1015, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:437-:d:1703069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.