IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i9p468-d1222753.html

Triggers and Halts of Professional Mobility in Public Companies: A Case Study of the Romanian Forest Administration

Author

Listed:
  • Vasile Iosifescu

    (Faculty of Forestry, University of Suceava, 13, Uniersității Str., 720229 Suceava, Romania)

  • Marian Drăgoi

    (Faculty of Forestry, University of Suceava, 13, Uniersității Str., 720229 Suceava, Romania)

Abstract

This research tried to identify the most important factors that motivate or hinder forest engineers in commuting between their household and the regional office of the National Forest Administration, or prompt them to relocate their entire family to Bucharest, where the headquarters of the NFA is located, in seeking promotion in the professional hierarchy. A survey, administered as a Google form, was designed to carry out analysis of independent benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks. The decision process was designed as an analytic hierarchy process, and each one of these factors was a separate analytic hierarchy process. We found that forest engineers tend to be very conservative when it comes to changing their professional position from the forest district to the NFA regional office or NFA top management. On the one hand, the professional opportunities to promote upwards do not compensate for the fringe benefits gained at the forest district level, while the costs of living in a larger city outweigh the benefits, even though the house rent is paid by the employer.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasile Iosifescu & Marian Drăgoi, 2023. "Triggers and Halts of Professional Mobility in Public Companies: A Case Study of the Romanian Forest Administration," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:468-:d:1222753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/9/468/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/9/468/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dejian Yu & Gang Kou & Zeshui Xu & Shunshun Shi, 2021. "Analysis of Collaboration Evolution in AHP Research: 1982–2018," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(01), pages 7-36, January.
    2. Vincent, Jeffrey R., 2004. "Detecting illegal trade practices by analyzing discrepancies in forest products trade statistics : An application to Europe, with a focus on Romania," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3261, The World Bank.
    3. Scriban, Ramona Elena & Nichiforel, Liviu & Bouriaud, Laura Gianina & Barnoaiea, Ionut & Cosofret, Vasile Cosmin & Barbu, Catalina Oana, 2019. "Governance of the forest restitution process in Romania: An application of the DPSIR model," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 59-67.
    4. Johanna Gisladottir & Sigurbjörg Sigurgeirsdottir & Ingrid Stjernquist & Kristin Vala Ragnarsdottir, 2020. "Corruption Risks in Renewable Resource Governance: Case Studies in Iceland and Romania," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 167-179.
    5. Gary S. Fields, 2019. "Concepts of social mobility," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-106, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    6. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Abbas Mardani & Zenonas Turskis & Ahmad Jusoh & Khalil MD Nor, 2016. "Development of TOPSIS Method to Solve Complicated Decision-Making Problems — An Overview on Developments from 2000 to 2015," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 645-682, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michele Bernasconi & Giulio Cinquanta & Valentino Dardanoni & Vincenzo Prete, 2025. "Mobility Comparisons: Theoretical Definitions and People’s Perceptions," Games, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Juan Carlos Martín & Carmen Orden-Cruz & Slimane Zergane, 2020. "Islamic Finance and Halal Tourism: An Unexplored Bridge for Smart Specialization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Yongli Wang & Xiangyi Zhou & Hao Liu & Xichang Chen & Zixin Yan & Dexin Li & Chang Liu & Jiarui Wang, 2023. "Evaluation of the Maturity of Urban Energy Internet Development Based on AHP-Entropy Weight Method and Improved TOPSIS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Polas, Md. Abul Bashar & Ahammad, Ronju & Topp, Emmeline & Plieninger, Tobias, 2025. "Participatory mapping of degradation and restoration processes in the Sundarbans mangrove ecosystem," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    5. Fabrizio Di Mascio & Simona Piattoni, 2020. "Corruption Control in the Developed World," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 72-77.
    6. Roman Vavrek, 2024. "Spatial Interpretation of Multi-Criteria Analysis: A Case Study with a Decreasing Number of Criteria and Subjective Approach to Determining Their Importance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Jing Wang & Jian-Qiang Wang & Hong-Yu Zhang & Xiao-Hong Chen, 2017. "Distance-Based Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Approaches with Multi-Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Information," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04), pages 1069-1099, July.
    8. Wanying Zhong & Yue Wang, 2022. "A study on the spatial and temporal variation of urban integrated vulnerability in Southwest China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(3), pages 2855-2882, December.
    9. Seyit Ali Erdogan & Jonas Šaparauskas & Zenonas Turskis, 2019. "A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model to Choose the Best Option for Sustainable Construction Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Xu, Haoxin & Romagnoli, Alessandro & Sze, Jia Yin & Py, Xavier, 2017. "Application of material assessment methodology in latent heat thermal energy storage for waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 281-290.
    11. Elena Cervelli & Stefania Pindozzi & Emilia Allevato & Luigi Saulino & Roberto Silvestro & Ester Scotto di Perta & Antonio Saracino, 2022. "Landscape Planning Integrated Approaches to Support Post-Wildfire Restoration in Natural Protected Areas: The Vesuvius National Park Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-25, July.
    12. Andra-Cosmina Albulescu & Michael Manton & Daniela Larion & Per Angelstam, 2022. "The Winding Road towards Sustainable Forest Management in Romania, 1989–2022: A Case Study of Post-Communist Social–Ecological Transition," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-29, July.
    13. Yun Jin & Hecheng Wu & Dechao Sun & Shouzhen Zeng & Dandan Luo & Bo Peng, 2019. "A Multi-Attribute Pearson’s Picture Fuzzy Correlation-Based Decision-Making Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-12, October.
    14. Roman Vavrek, 2019. "Evaluation of the Impact of Selected Weighting Methods on the Results of the TOPSIS Technique," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(06), pages 1821-1843, November.
    15. Bottaro, Giorgia & Liagre, Ludwig & Pettenella, Davide, 2024. "The Forest Sector in EU Member States' National Recovery and Resilience Plans: a preliminary analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    16. Vytautas PALEVIČIUS & Henrikas SIVILEVIČIUS & Askoldas PODVIEZKO & Aušrinė GRIŠKEVIČIŪTĖ - GEČIENĖ & Tomas KARPAVIČIUS, 2017. "Evaluation of Park and Ride Facilities at Communication Corridors in a Middle-Sized City," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 51(2), pages 231-248.
    17. Marta Nikanorova & Jelena Stankevičienė, 2020. "Development of environmental pillar in the context of circular economy assessment: Baltic Sea Region case," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(1), pages 1209-1223, September.
    18. Ahani, Ali & Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh & Yadegaridehkordi, Elaheh & Sanzogni, Louis & Tarik, A. Rashid & Knox, Kathy & Samad, Sarminah & Ibrahim, Othman, 2019. "Revealing customers’ satisfaction and preferences through online review analysis: The case of Canary Islands hotels," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 331-343.
    19. Talpă, Nicolae & Nichiforel, Liviu & Hălălișan, Aureliu-Florin & Indreica, Adrian & Păcurar, Victor Dan & Bouriaud, Laura & Barnoaiea, Ionuț & Drăgoi, Marian & Enescu, Cristian Mihai & Popa, Bogdan, 2026. "Science-policy interface in participatory reforms: Integrating forest governance principles into Romania's forestry strategy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    20. Jianmin Jia & Mohamed Ibrahim & Mohammed Hadi & Wallied Orabi & Yan Xiao, 2018. "Multi-Criteria Evaluation Framework in Selection of Accelerated Bridge Construction (ABC) Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:468-:d:1222753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.