IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v11y2022i8p345-d880465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Big Girls Don’t Cry: An Assessment of Research Units’ Leadership and Gender Distribution in Higher Education Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Ricardo Morais

    (LabCom—Communication and Arts, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)

  • Clara E. Fernandes

    (LASALLE College of the Arts, 1 McNally Street, Singapore 187940, Singapore
    UNIDCOM-IADE, Av. Dom Carlos I 4, 1200-649 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Valeriano Piñeiro-Naval

    (Observatorio de los Contenidos Audiovisuales, Universidad de Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain)

Abstract

Academia is often pointed out as a challenging environment to evolve in, especially for women. Whilst women perform in multidisciplinary settings, studies point out still-existing gender gaps in academia, especially in positions of power. This study looks at decision-making positions in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), specifically in Portuguese academic research. Furthermore, we seek to understand if research roles are distributed equally gender-wise among cohorts in research units, as well as if deans’ genders are a factor of influence in such role attributions. We will look at the research roles in academia, particularly research units fostered by HEIs, to observe gender distribution based on total cohorts. Using univariate and bivariate tests, our research aims to assess gender distribution in leading research roles in public and private institutions. We take the specific case of Portugal; therefore, we cannot extrapolate the results to other countries. However, outcomes point out resisting differences in fields of research and coordination and role distribution among R&D units, as well as in fundamental relations between power positions in academia and research.

Suggested Citation

  • Ricardo Morais & Clara E. Fernandes & Valeriano Piñeiro-Naval, 2022. "Big Girls Don’t Cry: An Assessment of Research Units’ Leadership and Gender Distribution in Higher Education Institutions," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:345-:d:880465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/8/345/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/8/345/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sara Diogo & Teresa Carvalho & Zélia Breda, 2021. "Nomination vs. election: do they influence women’s access to institutional decision-making bodies?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(3), pages 879-898, September.
    2. Pat O’Connor & Gemma Irvine, 2020. "Multi-Level State Interventions and Gender Equality in Higher Education Institutions: The Irish Case," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Margaret Hodgins & Pat O’Connor & Lucy-Ann Buckley, 2022. "Institutional Change and Organisational Resistance to Gender Equality in Higher Education: An Irish Case Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Margaret Hodgins, 2021. "Taking on the Institution: An Autoethnographic Account," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Soraya Elizabeth Shamloo & Valeria De Cristofaro & Valerio Pellegrini & Marco Salvati, 2022. "Masculinity and Leadership Effectiveness (Self-)Perceptions: The Case of Lesbian Leaders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:345-:d:880465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.