IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v9y2020i9p112-d412413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Method of Selecting Opening Cut Location Using Multi-Criteria Analysis of Decision Variant Mapping

Author

Listed:
  • Zbigniew Kasztelewicz

    (Management Office, PGE Górnictwo i Energetyka Konwencjonalna S.A., 97-400 Bełchatów, Poland)

  • Mateusz Sikora

    (Faculty of Mining and Geoengineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

  • Maciej Zajączkowski

    (Faculty of Mining and Geoengineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the article is to present a solution to the research problem that addresses the selection of the opening cut location in the surface mining method. Selecting the opening cut location is a strategic mine planning matter and has a key impact on the overall processes occurring during mining operations. This choice is a complex, and at the same time, mathematically ill-defined issue. The selection procedure should take into account many, often opposing, perspectives of the interveners, who represent the criteria laid down by the technical and organisational, economic, as well as social and environmental groups. In order to be able to compare criteria of a different nature, the authors implemented a multi-criteria method as a solution, derived from operational research. The mathematical tool best suited to the characteristics of the issue of selecting the opening cut location is a method from the ELECTRE family, which was used to create the final solution ranking. The main achievement of the method presented is the specification of a complementary group of assessment criteria and the application of a method allowing a solution to be created, which results in the selection of the most favourable decision variant. The developed method supports decision-makers responsible for making investment decisions in the implementation of mining projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Zbigniew Kasztelewicz & Mateusz Sikora & Maciej Zajączkowski, 2020. "Method of Selecting Opening Cut Location Using Multi-Criteria Analysis of Decision Variant Mapping," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:9:y:2020:i:9:p:112-:d:412413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/9/9/112/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/9/9/112/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francis Pavloudakis & Christos Roumpos & Evangelos Karlopoulos & Nikolaos Koukouzas, 2020. "Sustainable Rehabilitation of Surface Coal Mining Areas: The Case of Greek Lignite Mines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Philip-Mark Spanidis & Christos Roumpos & Francis Pavloudakis, 2020. "A Multi-Criteria Approach for the Evaluation of Low Risk Restoration Projects in Continuous Surface Lignite Mines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Nieć, Marek & Galos, Krzysztof & Szamałek, Krzysztof, 2014. "Main challenges of mineral resources policy of Poland," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 93-103.
    4. Stephanie Campbell & Lars Coenen, 2017. "Transitioning beyond coal: Lessons from the structural renewal of Europe’s old industrial regions," CCEP Working Papers 1709, Centre for Climate & Energy Policy, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    5. Michal Cehlár & Juraj Janočko & Zuzana Šimková & Tomas Pavlik & Maxim Tyulenev & Sergey Zhironkin & Magerram Gasanov, 2019. "Mine Sited after Mine Activity: The Brownfields Methodology and Kuzbass Coal Mining Case," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ronyastra, I Made & Saw, Lip Huat & Low, Foon Siang, 2023. "A review of methods for integrating risk management and multicriteria decision analysis in financial feasibility for post-coal-mining land usage selection," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    2. Philip-Mark Spanidis & Christos Roumpos & Francis Pavloudakis, 2023. "Evaluation of Strategies for the Sustainable Transformation of Surface Coal Mines Using a Combined SWOT–AHP Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Andrzej Bialas, 2022. "Towards a Software Tool Supporting Decisions in Planning Heap Revitalization Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-33, February.
    4. Yanguas Parra, Paola & Hauenstein, Christian & Oei, Pao-Yu, 2021. "The death valley of coal – Modelling COVID-19 recovery scenarios for steam coal markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    5. Christina G. Siontorou, 2023. "Fair Development Transition of Lignite Areas: Key Challenges and Sustainability Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Oei, Pao-Yu & Hermann, Hauke & Herpich, Philipp & Holtemöller, Oliver & Lünenbürger, Benjamin & Schult, Christoph, 2020. "Coal phase-out in Germany – Implications and policies for affected regions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    7. Benedykt Pepliński & Wawrzyniec Czubak, 2021. "The Influence of Opencast Lignite Mining Dehydration on Plant Production—A Methodological Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-29, March.
    8. Marzena Smol & Paulina Marcinek & Joanna Duda & Dominika Szołdrowska, 2020. "Importance of Sustainable Mineral Resource Management in Implementing the Circular Economy (CE) Model and the European Green Deal Strategy," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz & Kural, Orhan, 2020. "The effects of the mining operation activities permit process on the mining sector in Turkey," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    10. Germán Caruso & Inés Marcos & Ilan Noy, 2024. "Climate Changes Affect Human Capital," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 157-196, March.
    11. Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh & Ali Abumalloh, Rabab & Keng-Boon, Ooi & Wei-Han Tan, Garry & Cham, Tat-Huei & Cheng-Xi Aw, Eugene, 2024. "Unlocking sustainable resource management: A comprehensive SWOT and thematic analysis of FinTech with a focus on mineral management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    12. Nora Stognief & Paula Walk & Oliver Schöttker & Pao-Yu Oei, 2019. "Economic Resilience of German Lignite Regions in Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Alina Maciejewska & Łukasz Kuzak & Janusz Sobieraj & Dominik Metelski, 2022. "The Impact of Opencast Lignite Mining on Rural Development: A Literature Review and Selected Case Studies Using Desk Research, Panel Data and GIS-Based Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-36, July.
    14. Oei, Pao-Yu & Brauers, Hanna & Herpich, Philipp, 2020. "Lessons from Germany’s hard coal mining phase-out: policies and transition from 1950 to 2018," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(8), pages 963-979.
    15. Liu, Jing & Wang, Xiao Dan, 2024. "Mining industry development, enforcement intensity of security policy and intra-city development disparity," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    16. Naworyta Wojciech, 2016. "The need for verification of the Polish lignite deposits owing to development and nature conservation protection on land at the surface," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 4(4), pages 24-31, December.
    17. Francis Pavloudakis & Christos Roumpos & Evangelos Karlopoulos & Nikolaos Koukouzas, 2020. "Sustainable Rehabilitation of Surface Coal Mining Areas: The Case of Greek Lignite Mines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, August.
    18. Frantál, Bohumil & Chodkowska-Miszczuk, Justyna M. & Alexandrescu, Filip & Stölzel, Franziska & Klusáček, Petr & Konečný, Ondřej & Süsser, Diana & Lewandowska, Agata & Zieliński, Dominik, 2025. "With coal forever? Conflicted attitudes of residents in coal mining areas in the Czech Republic, Germany and Poland to coal phase-out," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    19. Enkhjargal Sodnomdarjaa & Frank Lehmkuhl & Daniel Karthe & Alexey V. Alekseenko & Martin Knippertz, 2024. "Tackling soil erosion and contamination within the SDGs framework: a case study of the Erdenet copper-molybdenum mine," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Henrieta Pavolová & Tomáš Bakalár & Alexander Tokarčík & Ľubica Kozáková & Tomáš Pastyrčák, 2021. "An Economic Analysis of Brownfield and Greenfield Industrial Parks Investment Projects: A Case Study of Eastern Slovakia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:9:y:2020:i:9:p:112-:d:412413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.