IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v3y2014i4p636-656d42740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Multiple Functions and Services of Community Seedbanks

Author

Listed:
  • Ronnie Vernooy

    (Bioversity International, Via dei Tre Denari 472/a, Maccarese 00057, Italy)

  • Bhuwon Sthapit

    (Bioversity International, 93.4 Dharahara Marg, Fulbari, Ward #11Pokhara, Nepal)

  • Gea Galluzzi

    (Bioversity International, c/o CIAT, km 17 Recta Cali-Palmira, Cali, Colombia)

  • Pitambar Shrestha

    (LI-BIRD, P.O. Box 324, Pokhara, Kaski, Nepal)

Abstract

Although community-level seed-saving initiatives have existed in many countries around the world for about 30 years, they have rarely been the subject of systematic scientific enquiry. Based on a combination of a literature review and field research, we present a novel comprehensive conceptual framework that focuses on the multiple functions and services provided by community-based seed-saving efforts, in particular community seed banks. This framework is output oriented and complements an input oriented typology of community seed banks presented in 1997. The framework identifies three core functions: conserving genetic resources; enhancing access to and availability of diverse local crops; and ensuring seed and food sovereignty. The framework can be used for analysis of existing seed-saving initiatives and serve as a guide for the establishment of new community seed banks. In addition, it can inform the development or revision of national policies or strategies to support community seed banks. The framework’s utility is illustrated by three case studies of community seed banks in Bangladesh, Guatemala and Nepal.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronnie Vernooy & Bhuwon Sthapit & Gea Galluzzi & Pitambar Shrestha, 2014. "The Multiple Functions and Services of Community Seedbanks," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:3:y:2014:i:4:p:636-656:d:42740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/3/4/636/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/3/4/636/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas F. Döring & Samuel Knapp & Geza Kovacs & Kevin Murphy & Martin S. Wolfe, 2011. "Evolutionary Plant Breeding in Cereals—Into a New Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(10), pages 1-28, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rose Nankya & Abdel Kader Naino Jika & Paola De Santis & Hannington Lwandasa & Devra Ivy Jarvis & John Wasswa Mulumba, 2022. "Community Seedbanks in Uganda: Fostering Access to Genetic Diversity and Its Conservation," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-11, June.
    2. Viviana Meixner Vásquez & Regine Andersen, 2023. "Community seed banks: Instruments for food security or unsustainable endeavour? A case study of Mkombezi Community Seed Bank in Malawi," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(4), pages 1087-1108, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lance F. Merrick & Steven R. Lyon & Kerry A. Balow & Kevin M. Murphy & Stephen S. Jones & Arron H. Carter, 2020. "Utilization of Evolutionary Plant Breeding Increases Stability and Adaptation of Winter Wheat Across Diverse Precipitation Zones," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Livia Marchetti & Valentina Cattivelli & Claudia Cocozza & Fabio Salbitano & Marco Marchetti, 2020. "Beyond Sustainability in Food Systems: Perspectives from Agroecology and Social Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Rose Nankya & John W. Mulumba & Francesco Caracciolo & Maria Raimondo & Francesca Schiavello & Elisabetta Gotor & Enoch Kikulwe & Devra I. Jarvis, 2017. "Yield Perceptions, Determinants and Adoption Impact of on Farm Varietal Mixtures for Common Bean and Banana in Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Michael Halewood & Ana Bedmar Villanueva & Jazzy Rasolojaona & Michelle Andriamahazo & Naritiana Rakotoniaina & Bienvenu Bossou & Toussaint Mikpon & Raymond Vodouhe & Lena Fey & Andreas Drews & P. Lav, 2021. "Enhancing farmers’ agency in the global crop commons through use of biocultural community protocols," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(2), pages 579-594, June.
    5. Eva Johansson & Faraz Muneer & Thomas Prade, 2023. "Plant Breeding to Mitigate Climate Change—Present Status and Opportunities with an Assessment of Winter Wheat Cultivation in Northern Europe as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Odette D. Weedon & Maria R. Finckh, 2019. "Heterogeneous Winter Wheat Populations Differ in Yield Stability Depending on their Genetic Background and Management System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Johannes Timaeus & Odette Denise Weedon & Maria Renate Finckh, 2021. "Combining Genetic Gain and Diversity in Plant Breeding: Heritability of Root Selection in Wheat Populations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Ireneusz Kowalik & Bogna Zawieja & Piotr Rybacki & Krzysztof Krzyżaniak, 2023. "Evaluation of the Quality and Possible Use of a New Generation of Agricultural Nets for Packing Bulk Materials in Terms of the Aspect of Reducing the Environmental Burden," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, February.
    9. Véronique Chable & Edwin Nuijten & Ambrogio Costanzo & Isabelle Goldringer & Riccardo Bocci & Bernadette Oehen & Frédéric Rey & Dionysia Fasoula & Judit Feher & Marjo Keskitalo & Beate Koller & Michal, 2020. "Embedding Cultivated Diversity in Society for Agro-Ecological Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-34, January.
    10. Edwin Nuijten & Monika M. Messmer & Edith T. Lammerts van Bueren, 2016. "Concepts and Strategies of Organic Plant Breeding in Light of Novel Breeding Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Salvatore Ceccarelli, 2014. "GM Crops, Organic Agriculture and Breeding for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-14, July.
    12. Linda Legzdiņa & Māra Bleidere & Dace Piliksere & Indra Ločmele, 2022. "Agronomic Performance of Heterogeneous Spring Barley Populations Compared with Mixtures of Their Parents and Homogeneous Varieties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:3:y:2014:i:4:p:636-656:d:42740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.