IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v14y2025i6p90-d1665798.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Future Development of Raw Material Policy Based on Statistical Data Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Lucia Domaracká

    (Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies (FBERG), Technical University of Košice, Letná 9, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Damiana Šaffová

    (Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies (FBERG), Technical University of Košice, Letná 9, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Katarína Čulková

    (Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies (FBERG), Technical University of Košice, Letná 9, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Marcela Taušová

    (Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies (FBERG), Technical University of Košice, Letná 9, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Barbara Kowal

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, AGH University of Krakow, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

  • Simona Matušková

    (VSB Technical University of Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 15, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

Abstract

For the European Union in the field of raw material policy, it is primarily important to ensure reliable, seamless, and unrestricted access to raw materials in all EU countries. An important aspect in assessing the European Union’s raw material policy is a detailed analysis of selected significant raw materials. This paper focuses on raw material policy within the European Union (EU). Specifically, it examines five types of raw materials: critical raw materials, metal ores, non-metallic minerals, fossil energy materials, and biomass. The research is oriented to analyzing the materials from the perspectives of consumption, mining, export, and import. The objective is to assess the European Union’s (EU) raw material policy by employing specific tools and statistical methodologies to analyze individual data. We aimed to assess the European Union (EU) raw material policy using selected statistical methods such as regression and correlation analysis, multivariate analysis, and pairwise correlation to reveal and describe the relationships between variables. Based on the examination of import and export data, it is evident that imports are on the rise while exports are declining. This trend underscores the EU’s continued reliance on raw materials sourced from other global regions. The results show that domestic production and consumption are sufficient; on the other hand, the EU remains dependent on imports of critical raw materials. The results are useful for the development of future EU raw material policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucia Domaracká & Damiana Šaffová & Katarína Čulková & Marcela Taušová & Barbara Kowal & Simona Matušková, 2025. "Future Development of Raw Material Policy Based on Statistical Data Analysis," Resources, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:90-:d:1665798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/14/6/90/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/14/6/90/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charlier, Christophe & Guillou, Sarah, 2014. "Distortion effects of export quota policy: an analysis of the China-Raw Materials dispute," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 320-338.
    2. Blengini, Gian Andrea & Nuss, Philip & Dewulf, Jo & Nita, Viorel & Peirò, Laura Talens & Vidal-Legaz, Beatriz & Latunussa, Cynthia & Mancini, Lucia & Blagoeva, Darina & Pennington, David & Pellegrini,, 2017. "EU methodology for critical raw materials assessment: Policy needs and proposed solutions for incremental improvements," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 12-19.
    3. Sofia Berdysheva & Svetlana Ikonnikova, 2021. "The Energy Transition and Shifts in Fossil Fuel Use: The Study of International Energy Trade and Energy Security Dynamics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-26, August.
    4. Sophie Meunier & Kalypso Nicolaidis, 2019. "The Geopoliticization of European Trade and Investment Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(S1), pages 103-113, September.
    5. Vitor Correia & W. Eberhard Falck, 2023. "The INTRAW International Raw Materials Observatory," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 36(2), pages 367-368, June.
    6. Helbig, Christoph & Wietschel, Lars & Thorenz, Andrea & Tuma, Axel, 2016. "How to evaluate raw material vulnerability - An overview," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 13-24.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marie K. Schellens & Johanna Gisladottir, 2018. "Critical Natural Resources: Challenging the Current Discourse and Proposal for a Holistic Definition," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Bach, Vanessa & Finogenova, Natalia & Berger, Markus & Winter, Lisa & Finkbeiner, Matthias, 2017. "Enhancing the assessment of critical resource use at the country level with the SCARCE method – Case study of Germany," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 283-299.
    3. Yu, Shiwei & Duan, Haoran & Cheng, Jinhua, 2021. "An evaluation of the supply risk for China's strategic metallic mineral resources," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. Galos, Krzysztof & Lewicka, Ewa & Burkowicz, Anna & Guzik, Katarzyna & Kot-Niewiadomska, Alicja & Kamyk, Jarosław & Szlugaj, Jarosław, 2021. "Approach to identification and classification of the key, strategic and critical minerals important for the mineral security of Poland," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    5. Christoph Helbig & Martin Bruckler & Andrea Thorenz & Axel Tuma, 2021. "An Overview of Indicator Choice and Normalization in Raw Material Supply Risk Assessments," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-26, August.
    6. Hatayama, Hiroki & Tahara, Kiyotaka, 2018. "Adopting an objective approach to criticality assessment: Learning from the past," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 96-102.
    7. Kim, Juhan & Lee, Jungbae & Kim, BumChoong & Kim, Jinsoo, 2019. "Raw material criticality assessment with weighted indicators: An application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 225-233.
    8. Aiman Fadil & Paul Davis & John Geraghty, 2023. "A Mixed-Method Approach to Determine the Successful Factors Affecting the Criticality Level of Intermediate and Final Products on National Basis: A Case Study from Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-29, March.
    9. Kühnel, Konstantin & Schütte, Philip & Bach, Vanessa & Franken, Gudrun & Finkbeiner, Matthias, 2023. "Correlation analysis of country governance indicators and the magnitude of environmental and social incidents in mining," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    10. Griffin, Gillian & Gaustad, Gabrielle & Badami, Kedar, 2019. "A framework for firm-level critical material supply management and mitigation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 262-276.
    11. Seiler, Volker, 2024. "The relationship between Chinese and FOB prices of rare earth elements – Evidence in the time and frequency domain," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 160-179.
    12. Jonas Vaicys & Povilas Norkevicius & Arturas Baronas & Saulius Gudzius & Audrius Jonaitis & Dimosthenis Peftitsis, 2021. "Efficiency Evaluation of the Dual System Power Inverter for On-Grid Photovoltaic System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Clement Bonnet & Samuel Carcanague & Emmanuel Hache & Gondia Seck & Marine Simoën, 2019. "Vers une Géopolitique de l'énergie plus complexe ? Une analyse prospective tridimensionnelle de la transition énergétique," Working Papers hal-02971706, HAL.
    14. Jun U. Shepard & Bas J. van Ruijven & Behnam Zakeri, 2022. "Impacts of Trade Friction and Climate Policy on Global Energy Trade Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    15. Baldassarre, Brian, 2025. "Circular economy for resource security in the European Union (EU): Case study, research framework, and future directions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    16. Masoudi, S.M. & Ezzati, E. & Rashidnejad-Omran, N. & Moradzadeh, Ali, 2017. "Geoeconomics of fluorspar as strategic and critical mineral in Iran," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 100-106.
    17. Sarah Bauerle Danzman & Sophie Meunier, 2024. "The EU's Geoeconomic Turn: From Policy Laggard to Institutional Innovator," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 1097-1115, July.
    18. Han, Linna & Chen, Xihui Haviour & Wang, Yong & Hoang, Yen Hai, 2024. "Examining the impact of mineral export controls on sustainable energy transition in the global south," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    19. Benjamin Bürbaumer, 2021. "The Limits of Traditional Bargaining under Deep Integration: TTIP Stumbling over Technical Barriers to Trade," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1069-1085, September.
    20. Andreas Manhart & Regine Vogt & Michael Priester & Günter Dehoust & Andreas Auberger & Markus Blepp & Peter Dolega & Claudia Kämper & Jürgen Giegrich & Gerhard Schmidt & Jan Kosmol, 2019. "The environmental criticality of primary raw materials – A new methodology to assess global environmental hazard potentials of minerals and metals from mining," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 32(1), pages 91-107, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:90-:d:1665798. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.